Comparing Plato's Allegory Of The Cave And The Bible

1305 Words3 Pages

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance” –George Bernard Shaw. The bodies politic in Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” and the Bible, the Commonwealth and Israelites, both have shallow beliefs and believe what they know to be true. The Platonic Prisoner, from Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave”, and Moses, from the Book of Exodus in the Bible, both attempt to influence others with their newfound knowledge and wisdom because they feel the obligation to do so.They end up with different overall responses from their body politic as their relationships undergo change. For relationships to function, the bodies politic need to trust each other as well as courage. Relationship also need perseverance to last. Before relationships begin to develop, each of the protagonists are in different positions. Moses is born a Hebrew, but growing up he is considered an Egyptian. When Moses flees to Midian and saves the …show more content…

However, they deny the protagonists because they are insecure, afraid of the unknown and are too ignorant to understand. For Moses, he is able to watch over the Israelites and become a parental figure for them. Meanwhile, for the Platonic Prisoner, the Commonwealth attempts to kill him and rid of his unpalatable truth. In the beginning, the Israelites and Commonwealth are rejecting and denying the truth. By the end of both stories, the Israelites are accepting towards Moses and his sayings from God. As for the Commonwealth, they are still unwilling to listen and want to continue their trail of denial. Relationships are like a two-way street and they must be built on trust. Though, to start a relationship, it takes courage. Courage is what will give the will of people to even think about starting a relationship. Perseverance is needed to ensure that the relationship will get through rough times, even though it might be

Open Document