Workplace romance is an issue that has been causing employers to create and enforce a No-Fraternization Policy. A No-Fraternization Policy is sometimes called a “Love Contract,” according to Kathryn Taylor from Society for Humans Resource Management (2008). A love contract is a policy that is signed by those involved in the relationship and the employer. This contract is a testimony stating that the relationship is consensual and voluntary by both. Many employees would say this is an invasion of their privacy but to others, including myself, it’s a protection for them and for the company. The No-Fraternization Policy is valuable because it helps reduce the possibility of harassment, favoritism, and will help keep productivity at a healthy level. …show more content…
Many might suggest that favoritism is not a threating hazard in the work environment. However, if favoritism is allowed other actions will develop, like a chain of reactions such as; Accusations, Tension and eventually Division of Employees as suggested by an article called “What are the dangers of fraternization in the workplace?” by Shelly Frost from Small Business Chron (2016). Once again this is where having a No-Fraternization Policy intact would become very valuable. Supervisors or Managers in romantic relationships with a subordinate, may give special treatment, whether it’s intentional or not. The subordinate might be allowed to get away with more due to the fact that they are in relations with the supervisor. Employees may start accusations on favoritism against the supervisor and subordinate and could result in a written complaint against the company. When there is talk of favoritism and accusations going around in the work place it causes tension between co-workers. Division among co-workers will be the next phase and employees will start choosing sides which will cause productivity to
CRITICS OF THE VALUE OF FRATERNITIES and sororities have considerable evidence to support detrimental aspects of membership. Advocates counter that findings represent isolated cases comparable to the same rate of incidents by nonmember students or students in other campus organizations. The continued recurrence of the argument highlights a per- sistent difficulty confronting those interested in research and practice related to fraternal involvement. North-American Interfraternity Conference (NIC) President and CEO Pete Smithhisler recently stated, “often, arguments both for and against the fraternity experience focus on personal experience and anecdotal information” (Pendry, 2010, para. 2). The persistence of these ar- guments was most recently affirmed in a New York Times column (2011) asking experts to comment on the question, “Should Colleges Ban Frater- nities?” Further, research about the legal risks associated with fraternities on campus has done little to convince the public of the value of such organi- zations (e.g., Elkins, Helms, & Pierson, 2003; Hennessy & Huson, 1998), neither have popular books (e.g., DeSantis, 2007; Nuwer, 2001; Robbins, 2005), nor highly trafficked websites (e.g., http://totalfratmove.com/) that showcase the detrimental aspects of membership. Yet, students continue to join.
Most working adults can agree that they have seen their fair share of dysfunctional relationships in the workplace. Often, we can find some humor in the actions and events that cause these relationships to become dysfunctional. In the sitcom The Office, the focus was to exaggerate the actions of dysfunctional relationships in the workplace. The show makes light of the employees who are stuck in dead-end jobs, with mundane lives and their office mishaps. Daniel Orozco’s short story “Orientation” is about a current employee providing a new employee with too much personal information about other employees and the office environment during a new hire orientation. The “Orientation” by Daniel Orozco and the NBC sitcom “The Office” give a humorous and exaggerated glimpse of dysfunctional relationships within office environments.
The social institution topic that I am going to use for my paper is divorce. I chose to write my paper on divorce because the divorce rate has increased and is a prevalent social institution in our society. Divorce is a common issue that is a controversial topic that has all different opinions about it. Society is influenced by the people around us, that’s why a child with separated parents exhibit a greater chance for psychological struggles because they weren’t able to have both parents around to influence them. Divorce is a component of society that influences the behaviors and choices of the child as well as the parents. Society has an influence on divorce because divorce has become a social norm in our society. Relationships in society now have less commitment than in the past generations. Another
Fraternization in the workplace is often not thought of as an ethical issue; however, in some cases it may be. Fraternization, according to Merriam-Webster, is defined as spending time with a person in a way that may be considered inappropriate. There are many reasons that fraternizing is believed to exist. One reason for that is working long hours and being at work with coworkers more than at home with family. Dating in the workplace does not always cause problems, but it can lead to distraactions for those involved and for those on the outside fo the relationship.
The Zero-tolerance policy was originally developed in the 1980s to target the booming drug trade by the U.S. Customs Agency (Martinez, 2009). The policy was later adopted in public schools as a response to the perception that juvenile violence was increasing and the need for school officials to take desperate measures to address the problem of violence. School officials became increasingly concerned about the use of drugs and the increasing involvement of gang activity among students. The horrific shooting at the Columbine High School only further solidified the fears of school safety among students and staff (Curtis, 2014). The Zero-tolerance policy assumes that removing students who engage in disruptive behavior will deter others from disruption and create an improved climate for those who remain (American Psychologist, 2008). The U.S. educational system has implemented a policy and philosophy, which was intended to deter drug criminals to be rendered as a disciplinary tool for students.
For 200 years Fraternities have been perceived as a building block for loyalty, friendship, and life time connections, yet to those who are ignorant of the Greek system across campuses remain unaware of the debauchery happening to achieve these goals. Sexual assault and harassment have become pledges ' selling point in proving such loyalty. At least 1 in 4 college women will be the victim of a sexual assault during her academic career (Hirsch), and at least 80% of all sexual assaults are committed by an acquaintance of the victim ( Bureau of Justice Statistics). Fraternity members are usually well known, well rounded and on paper, typically outstanding young men. It’s a mystery as to why these “brothers” find it necessary to think harassment
Heterosexuality falls under the category of an institution and is supported by various other institutions. Heterosexuality as an institution shapes gender norms and puts a set of standards on sexuality that may be deviated from or broken (Walden 2016). Institutions such as: education, religion, media, the state, and even medicine reinforce hegemonic heterosexuality. To understand institutional reinforcement of heterosexuality, heterosexual imaginary must be understood. Ingraham defines the imaginary as, “that illusory relationship we can have to our real conditions of existence” (239: 2003). In this, heterosexual imaginary is able to establish the regulation of sexuality through institutions such as, state laws and even healthcare
A majority of employees feel those employees who get involved in a workplace relationship are seeking favoritism, career advancement, or special treatment. Employees are concerned about the pair engaging in PDA at work, favoritism, and the impact of the employees breaking up. This perception of workplace relationships damages office morale, decreases worker productivity, and opens up the company to a potential sexual harassment lawsuits. Companies must have policies in place that protect the company, the employees in the relationship, and the rest of the employees in the workplace.
What is marriage? According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary "Marriage is a union representing a special kind of social and legal partnership between two people”. Marriage is considered be a union in which it should last a life time. Marriage can be look at differently depending where you come from and also what you belief in. In western countries arrange marriages have been known to exist for decades. On the other hand there is also Love marriages which consist of two people who genuinely love and are attracted to one on other. Either Arrange or Love they are still considering marriages with different beliefs, traditions and customs. Arrange Marriages should not eve allow even though it is a culture in the Western Countries.
Throughout history, there has been controversy as to how many partners one person should be able to have. According to Dictionary.com, the definition of monogamy is, “marriage with only one person at a time.” Meaning you don't have any affairs, or any type of relations to anyone else except for your partner. Being monogamous is a good lifestyle because it promotes peace, you don't have to talk to many people, and it will improve the economy.
Separation among society is a problem in lots of countries, and that is one of the many reasons they are falling apart. Separation among society is the process of separating different people to different places in the society to make them all feel special. The United States of America shows separation among society. According to AustralianPolitics.com “The US is a Federal system. This means that power is divided between a central/national government and the States. The national government is referred to as the Federal Government.”. This is separation among society because the representatives have been divided by their rank and power. Separation among society is in North Korea, and has happened in Ancient Rome. This also shows separation
A lateral romance is a relationship between employees of equal status. A hierarchical romance is where two employees are at different organizational levels. For example, when a manager is romantically involved with his or her subordinate. Hierarchical WR are more frequent and more problematic than lateral romances due to the power differences between the partnership (Wilson, 2015). Research has also identified a number of different motives for engaging in a WR. It may be: a love motive- a sincere desire to seek a long-term relationship, an ego motive- a desire to seek adventure, excitement, sexual experience or a job-related motive- a desire to seek security, power, financial rewards (Wilson, 2015). Power is a key variable in understanding the effects and consequences of the romance. It acts as a function of the dependence of each partner on the other for resources that are exchanged in the relationship. Workplace behavior is affected when there is an unbalanced power relation, however when the power relationship is balanced, both members are equally committed to their organizational and personal roles (Pierce et al.,
What is a family? A family is two or more people consider themselves to be blood related, or related by marriage, or adoption. Our families are who we love. We as families look different in so many ways. A family’s caregiving unit might have a couple, a mother, a father, and children. A family could also be a single parent and child, a group of siblings, a small or large group of friends. A family defines itself in many different ways. Families are the foundation of how our society and how it works. It is how we come into the world and nurtured and given the tools that we need to go out into our world. We are both capable and healthy or not our families influence our lives either in a good way or a bad way. While families
Relationships are intricately complex. Made up of several interactions that are full of verbal and non-verbal communication, a relationship between any two people is completely and utterly unique. There are so many dynamics that are at play in relationships and several opportunities for both good and bad communication. In my life, I have experienced all kinds of people and relationships: friends, acquaintances, brothers, parents, teammates, lab-partners, peers, teachers, mentors. The list goes on and on. Three examples of my personal relationships are my relationship with my brother Caleb, my friend Kennedy, and my high school teacher Mrs. Antwine. In all three relationships, we communicate verbally and non-verbally. However, because of different circumstances, atmospheres, and backgrounds, each relationship differs from the others.
Marriage: It’s one of the most desired systems on the planet, yet it is still one of the most misunderstood ideas known to mankind. The definition of being in matrimony has evolved with time, and through the years society has been seemingly reluctant to such changes. From the end of anti-miscegenation laws to the legalization of interracial marriage, society has grown to understand the importance the choice of getting married has on the individual. As of now, the right of matrimony is given to all but one group of Americans.