Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Teachers should get tenure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Teachers should get tenure
Teachers are some of the most underappreciated workers in the workforce. Their hard work often goes unnoticed by others. There are many reasons why society tends to criticize teachers more than other occupations. One is the number of unskilled teachers outweighs the number of skilled teachers, which in return emits a poor reputation on teachers in general. Only one out of 1000 teachers gets fired for poor performance. Compared to the one in fifty seven doctors who lose their medical license and job due to poor performance, that number is outrageous. Why are teachers not getting fired? A majority of teachers are on tenure. Tenure is a contract that ensures teachers a job after a certain amount of time working for a school. It makes it close to impossible to fire the tenure teachers. The question of whether tenure is coherent has been persistently debated by many in the education system. Tenure is unethical and action should be taken to improve it. Tenure should be reformed because teachers on tenure who are incompetent are protected, the process of firing teachers on tenure is unnecessarily strenuous, and students are not benefited.
Teachers on tenure are protected under every circumstance, even poor performance. According to educational activist Geoffrey Canada, tenure is judging teachers by how long they have been at a school rather than their ability to teach, which is illogical. On tenure, a teacher could stop teaching content completely and they would not get fired because of their seniority. This is not fair because the students are not gaining knowledge. People for tenure argue that this is okay because the teacher has held the position for so long. In reality, this is not acceptable because it is severely damaging the stu...
... middle of paper ...
...d with teachers who do would ensure that students are learning.
Due to the protection of inefficient teachers, costly firing process, and detriment for students, the tenure should be reformed. Teachers who are doing a poor job of teaching are not getting fired, causing students to fail. Teachers are not getting fired because of the difficult process and that in turn widens the boundaries for things teachers can get away with. This program is just to benefit the teachers; the students were not considered. Students could fail later in life because of inefficient teachers. What needs to happen to fix this is a reform to tenure. Tenure should be granted by examining a teacher’s test scores and monitoring test scores after tenure is granted. It is the best way to make sure that the youth of the United States are well educated and on the path to a life full of success.
One of the blames claimed that “we have low-quality teaching because of low-quality teachers who never should have been certified in the first place.” (). Placing fault on teachers is inaccurate because not all teachers are to blame. There are teachers who push students to reach for their goals and to attend college so they can get a prominent job that makes them happy. Because a student fails, does not always mean it is because the teacher did not teach it well enough. It is possible that the student did not want to pursue further or rebelled against the teacher. There are students that do not want to be there, yet are being forced against their will due to the law. The teacher could be trying their best as well. Even though some may be low-quality, teachers want to see their students to succeed and grow into the person they want to be. Not to watch them fail and achieve nothing. It is sometimes that the students do not comply with their teachers. The one thing agreeable with Singleton is that if a student does not want to be in school, then let them
He also argues that without tenure it would to be easier to fire the 10 percent of teachers that are poor performers. I personally agree with Matthew Miller’s proposal.
From the reading “Ethical and Legal Issues in U.S. Education”, there were three points that that surprised me. One point was that it is so surprising to me that there are so many steps that a teacher, on tenure, must go through before they get fired. It makes it so difficult to be fired and such a long process that they will never be fired unless they commit a major crime and I believe that this should change. As a teacher, we need to be at the top of our game at all times, and teachers with tenure seem like they do not always have to in order to keep their job. It is also surprising to me that student teachers do not receive the same rights as normal teachers in some states. Student teachers are practicing to become a teacher one day, and
Professors with tenure, contend Hacker and Dreifus, are not motivated to perform well and therefore will engage the students in the way Hacker and Dreifus believe they should. To correct this, Hacker and Dreifus advocate for tenures to be replaced with multiyear contracts to ensure professors work hard for their own benefit and for the benefit of the students’. Keep the teachers in the classrooms inspiring young minds rather than taking unnecessary paid vacations, assert Hacker and Dreifus, who believe sabbaticals should be limited. Hacker and Dreifus also agree that adjunct teachers, professors who teach at a college but do not receive the same benefits as their peers who are, in fact, faculty members, should receive similar benefits. Capitalizing on adjunct teachers should be discouraged, demand the authors. Presidents of colleges, on the other hand, should receive less, more reasonable compensation for their
As mentioned the authors did argue some strong logical points. One of their strongest points just might be when they mentioned how tenure should be replaced with multiyear contracts. “Professors who possess it have no reason to improve their teaching, take on introductory courses, or, in fact, accept any tasks, not to their liking.” (Hacker and Dreifus 181). Some might argue better yet some will argue that “if he/she has been teaching a long time then they deserve to be granted tenure”, but wouldn’t it be better for our future and our children’s future if those who continues to teach well
Teacher tenure is a highly debatable topic- Should it be kept or banned forever in all schools? However, there is clearly only one explanation to this problem: We simply cannot continue with teacher tenure. It has passed it’s expiration date
...heir instruction, they they should stay in the field or in the labortory where their energy is concentrated. Quit wasting the time and money of the students and give college instructors the fair evaluations they deserve. Set standards for their positions and hold them accountable for skills in teaching, not just their content knowledge.
Major Depressive Disorder or MDD is a very common clinical condition that affects millions of people every year. According to the Agency for Health Care Policy & Research, “ depression is under diagnosed & untreated by most medical doctors, despite the fact that it can almost always be treated successfully.
It was protect them from losing their jobs, which at first is grand for the low paid teachers, but instead of doing good it causes education become impossible to teach. According to New York Times, a well known newspaper, states that “Firing a bad teacher could take anywhere from two to almost 10 years and cost $50,000 to $450,000 or more” (New York Times). This tener law, makes it a time consuming and money spending process that the schools are not worth taking. In the movie, “Waiting For Superman” , by Davis Guggenheim- a well known director who made many other successful non-fiction films-The film claims “That if only the bottom 1/5 of bad teachers in the US were fired and replaced by only average teachers, our national test scores would reach those of Finland, more than a dozen places higher on international exam scores” (Guggenheim). So we just edited the tenure law then we can rid of the ineffective teachers and replace them, so that the students will receive the tutelage need. In recent news on tenure-article by New York Times- a Los Angeles County Judge Rolf M. Treu began to fix tenure law stating, “the practices are unconstitutional, for teachers can receive lifetime tenor. The process of getting rid of teachers is long process and money spending. So it is hard to rid of tenor teachers” ( Treu). Judge says, “Ruling is stayed pending an appeal by unions and
Clinical depression is very common. Over nine million Americans are diagnosed with clinical depression at some point in their lives. Many more people suffer from clinical depression because they do not seek treatment. They may feel that depression is a personal weakness, or try to cope with their symptoms alone. On the other hand, some people are comfortable with admitting their symptoms and seeking help. Such a discrepancy may account for the differences in reported cases of depression between men and women, which indicate that more than twice the numbers of women than men are clinically depressed. According to the numbers of reported cases of depression, 25% of women and 10% of men will have one or more episodes of clinical depression during their lifetimes.
Effective teachers are inadequately rewarded in the United States. School districts, such as those in California, are just starting to implement merit pay. According to a study conducted by the National Center of Performance Incentives (NCPI), only about 500 school districts out of the 14,000 districts in the US implement merit pay for teachers. These numbers do not include private schools. Unfortunately, teachers, parents, and students hurt because many schools, private and public, base teacher pay on seniority and degrees rather than achievement and performance. Under such a system, novice teachers, are laid off during budget shortages. Moreover, with the current “single salary schedule” system, teachers are inadequately paid, especially when compared to other professions. Because the single salary schedule creates many issues, a solution needs to be proposed. Merit pay, a system based on performance, solves such issues. With this system, teacher performance outweighs teacher seniority. As a result, quality teachers will be rewarded adequately in terms of money and recognition. Outstanding teachers will no longer face unreasonable layoffs and will finally be paid more than their ineffective peers.
This in turn will cause the students to have a harder time learning because instead of the teachers teaching what the students need to be taught and more time teaching what the people who don’t know what the students know think the students should be taught. One example of this is, if a student already knows how to write a narrative but the standardized curriculum requires them to teach how to write a narrative it would be a big waste of time having to cover it that deeply if the students had already learned it. If those people would not have stepped in then the teacher could have moved faster and taught the students something they actually needed to be taught, such as how to write a argumentative essay (Paying teachers for student test scores damages schools and undermines learning) (Does Merit Pay For Teachers Have Merit? Pros And Cons Of New Models For Teacher Compensation). In the 2011-2012 school year (the year when they tried implementing performance/merit pay in idaho and many other states) the sat scores actually went down very slightly, or did not change at all --the score did not go up like the it was supposed to (Idaho ED
Teachers are what make the doctors, lawyers, policemen and the list goes on, yet many people still do not consider their job a profession. Argumentors ideology is a bit logical because not all students graduate high school; enter college/university, graduate and end up in a profession. Students are the reaped crop and if some are not delivering fruit, how can others tell that the students were taught properly? Also, as seen through Savage Inequalities: Children in American School’s, by Jonathan Kozol, some teachers should not be allowed in that field. Teachers are supposed to instruct, engage, and place attention to the students, but if they do not have a passion to educate the students, they will receive that negative atmosphere in the classroom and decide no to learn. In the beginning, teachers were mainly women because the government did not have to pay them too much. Currently, we have both male and female instructors doing the job. Teachers are educating the future, so they should receive proper education and tools, like a lot of other professions, teachers should undergo a series of lessons and tests every two years, so they can be kept up to date on the methodologies of teaching. Furthermore, in order to teach the children properly, teachers need the right materials for that peculiar subject. Lastly, teachers should receive multicultural training, so they know what types of students they are dealing with.
On February 17, 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was signed into law (US Dept of Education). According to the Executive Summary of the US Department of Education’s website the purpose of this act was to stimulate the economy, create jobs, and provide funding for education. To encourage education reform at the state level, the competitive grant program, “Race to the Top,” was implemented. This allowed states to apply for grants, provided that certain education reform was taking place within states’ schools. One particular condition under this campaign has led to much debate within our education system, implementing a pay system based on a teacher’s academic performance and the methods used to determine this (US Dept of Education).
The state’s new evaluation system was in response to administrators who produced, “superficial and capricious teacher evaluation systems that often don't even directly address the quality of instruction, much less measure students' learning” (Toch, 2008). Too often, the “good-ol-boy” attitude would insure mediocre educators would remain employed. Realizing this was often more the rule then the exception, the governor created educational mandates to focus, “on supporting and training effective teachers to drive student achievement” (Marzano Center, 2013). Initially, they expected the school districts and the teachers would have issues and experience growing pains, but in the end the goal was, “to improve teacher performance, year by year, with a corresponding rise in student achievement” (Marzano Center, 2013).