Yom Kippur Research Paper

1273 Words3 Pages

The surprise Arab attack on Israel from two fronts launched by Syrian and Egyptian forces commenced October 6, 1973. On this day every year the Jewish participate in the religious celebrations of Yom Kippur, also known as the Day of Atonement and the holiest day in the Jewish calendar. The Arabian forces intended to win back territory from Israel they had previously lost during the Arab-Israeli War of 1967 (History.com, 2009). Why did such a hostile attack from the Arabs occur and what was their incentive to seize the tiny nation of Israel? It can be debated that unresolved territorial conflict that arose from the previous Arab-Israeli war in 1967 was a catalyst for the fourth major military confrontation of Arabs and Israeli’s in the Yom Kippur …show more content…

Israel had become incredibly disconsolate after the elation of their victory in this war in 1967, due to the increasing rate of terrorism along with portentous threats from Egypt. Eleven Israeli athletes were murdered by Palestinian terrorists during the Munich Olympics in the summer of 1972 (American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise, n.d.). Prayers were often recited by members of parliament, thousands of graves were dug, and even gas masks were distributed, all in fear of an Arab invasion (The Israeli Network, n.d.). Israel’s surrounding Arab states decided that rather than tolerating their loss, they would concoct a strategy to equalise the degradation of their defeat. In 1970, Anwar el-Sadat was elected president of Egypt where he found himself front-runner of a nation in the midst of an economically distressed period (History.com, 2009). Sadat initiated the opportunity to sign a peace agreement with Israel in 1971, on condition that that all of Israel’s newly-claimed territories were recovered. After declining the offer, Israel was thought to have “missed an opportunity to avoid war,” when in actual fact Sadat anticipated the ignored compromise and was prepared to “capitulate to Egyptian demands without any guarantee of peace” (American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise, n.d.). No progress towards peace meant that Sadat would initiate a brutal war with narrow objectives, with the support from Syria, in order to “gain legitimacy” (Trautman,

Open Document