Write A Rhetorical Analysis On Starbucks

Bittersweet? why can’t we just call it coffee drink

I’m grumpy and smug on a coffee table not only when breakfast, but when at Starbucks. I’m skeptic about glorifying the expensive drink. Understanding its commercial rebuttal to my angst, I was cultured that it was the coffee shop experience aside from the good coffee. In that caffeine atmosphere of Itunes exclusives and wooden fixes, it is more conducive to simply relax, chit chat, write your thoughts, or read a book.

So much for a thought through Forbes, Times and most business review sites, I have read Starbucks targets customers who have money to spend on top of their wallets which they call “Disposable Income”. With that statement, I have a mockery to the targeted customers in which the majority of the working class belongs. “Hey, pick me as targeted customer”, do I

If it is soul satisfying that I threw away money because I earn so much. I want to see it in a deduction of theories among financial management and utilitarian approach if terms qualify, or we need to sidestep the understanding.

Starting with the definition in financial management, there are fundamentals we must secure before we can be labeled as self sufficient and stable, but how can be disposable money can be achieved.

Rule of thumb says, that in order to be financial independent you must have 10 months worth of your monthly salary in savings to be classified as “Rich” or technically speaking “Living Above Your Means” to start off with, and everything in excess must be installed as emergency fund, investment fund, and retirement fund. Bonus amounts heaped from that Maslow-like heirarchy may be transcendence of what we can deem as “disposable