Wound Assessment Paper

1222 Words3 Pages

2.4. CURCUMIN ADMINSTRATION Curcumin (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, USA) at 40 mg/kg of body weight was dissolved in one ml sesame oil by proper shaking of the tube. We did not observe any change in color of the solution during the experiment (23). The rats in the control group did not receive any treatment, and subjected to the PBM, in which the radiating probe was turned off. 2.5. CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS The rats’ weight was watched throughout the study. Every day, the wound site was examined properly for recording probable apparent exudation. 2.6. MEASUREMENTS OF WOUND AREA In order to compare wound closure among study groups, wound area was measured. The wound area measurements included measurement of the total wound area on the days 4, 7, …show more content…

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS All the data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation of the mean (SD). The student t test, one-way and two- way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the least significant difference (LSD) tests were used. The p-value of <0.05 was accepted. 3.RESULTS 3.1. Wound closure, Day 4 The curcumin (197±14), laser (243±20), and laser + curcumin (231 ±33) treated groups significantly enhanced wound closure. compared to the control group (329 ±6.7),(One-way ANOVA, LSD test for all groups, p=0.000). We have observed that the curcumin group had significantly enhanced wound closure, compared to the laser, and laser + Curcumin treatedgroups ( LSD test, p=0.009, p=0.040, respectively)(Figure 2). 3.2. Wound closure, Day 7 The curcumin (69±8.7), laser (85±12), and laser + curcumin (88 ±7.9) treated groups significantly enhanced wound closure, compared to the control group (139.8 ±20.2), (One-way ANOVA, LSD test for all groups, p=0.000). We have observed that the curcumin treated group had significantly enhanced wound closure, compared to the l aser + Curcumin group ( LSD test, p=0.033)(Figure2). 3.3.Wound closure, Day …show more content…

Laser and curcumin groups showed a significant decrease, compared to laser + curcumin groups (LSD test, both p=0.001). On day 15, the Laser (10±5), curcumin (14±4.5), and laser + curcumin (27.3 ±8.3) groups have significantly decreased CFU, compared to the control group (95 ±6), (LSD test, all p=0.000)(Figure 3). Laser and curcumin groups showed a significant decrease in CFU than laser + curcumin groups (LSD test, p=0.009, p=0.030, respectively). The two-way ANOVA table gives F statistics =286 with sig = 0.000 for the factor group (4); F statistics 10.5 with sig = 0.005 for the factor after surgery time points (two); and F statistics 6.6 with sig = 0.004 for the interaction effect of after surgery time points × study groups. We found significant differences in CFU among control and other groups, and also between laser, and curcumin groups and laser + curcumin treated group (Figure 4). It means regarding the microbiology, results of laser and curcumin groups were statistically better than laser + curcumin

More about Wound Assessment Paper

Open Document