World War Z Film: An Evaluation and Critique

646 Words2 Pages

World War Z is a film adaptation of the book written by Max Brooks. It was first released in theatres in 2013 and made a revenue of $200 million dollars. The movie is directed by Marc Forster and had a budget of $190 million. The film is PG-13 and has a rating of 63% on a famous film review site called “Rotten Tomatoes.” Although film adaptations have their flaws, it seems that this film has more than just a few. There were several reasons why I wouldn’t recommend this film. Although, let me give a summary about the movie before the critique. The movie starred with Brad Pitt as Gerry Lane, a former U.N. Investigator, witnessing a zombie virus take over in the middle of a trip to the city. He tries to ensure his family’s safety working for the government by trying to find the origin of the outbreak. While traveling to find the origin, Gerry meets new people and travels to different areas, seeing how this virus affects others. Finally, let’s move onto the critique of the movie. The first reason why I wouldn’t recommend this movie is because it had such unrealistic scenarios. During a scene in the movie, there is a soldier who should’ve bled out to death, but somehow remained to live without bleeding once or even passing out. In another scene in the movie, an incident occurred in a plane which resulted a hole to appear on the …show more content…

Personally, whenever I think of a zombie movie, I expect a lot of death, blood, and guts. This movie seems like they were trying to think outside the box. Although this movie does have a lot of death, where is the violence, fighting, and the gore? This film seems like a film to take the kids to, which I personally don’t like. This movie is supposed to be an action filled zombie genre film, not an unexciting and boring one. With such a high budget, it seems like they just ran out of money and had to settle for less exciting

Open Document