Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ideolgy of zombie films
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ideolgy of zombie films
After hearing about how awful this film was from friends and reading the reviews I wasn't optimistic entering this film. Sadly this film lived up to my abysmal exceptions, even though it sports a number of actors that I really do enjoy. Ving Rhames makes a return to the series, though this time he's playing Captain Rhodes. He's joined by Mena Suvari, and AnnaLynne McCord, who blew me away with her performance in Excision. Though even with all these excellent performers, Day of the Dead manages to be bland and generic. A poor job that doesn't live up to the original in a single aspect.
Day of the Dead opens with a group of kids, Trevor Bowman (Michael Welch), his girlfriend Nina (AnnaLynne McCord), his friend Kyle (Hugh Skinner) along with
…show more content…
Ving Rhames especially, as his Rhodes comes off far more like-able than Joseph Pilato's rendition. Though here the character fills a very different role. Ok, I also liked Mina Suvari and Stark Sands chemistry on …show more content…
The zombies in this film are uninteresting and bland. Something I didn't know zombies could be. I think its because they come off more as mutated people then they do the undead. My biggest peeves steam from Zombie Rhodes eating his own eye and the Zombies eat another Zombie. Which is a first for me as one of the generic zombie rules is that zombies don't eat their own. They eat us.
The effects are done in a clunky CGI, which doesn't do this film any favors. This Day of the Dead could have taken some pointers from the 1985 version in regards to effects. Since out of the two, with over twenty years of technological advancement this version look by far the worst.
Final thoughts, it's awful and lives up to its poor reputation. I can understand why this film was straight to video and I can't honestly suggest to anyone. As a fan of the zombie genre, this one nearly put me to sleep. Which is something a zombie film shouldn't do. Because even with all the action going on on-screen, Day of the Dead still managed to be boring.
Romero’s cult classic work “Night of the Living Dead” displayed characters enacting their stereotypes, portraying men and women in their stereotypical sexist behaviors. Themes of such stereotypes are hinted within the movie, hidden underneath the idea of carnal, flesh eating ghouls. The character Barbra, is the embodiment of the helpless woman in horror films. Ben, the power controlling domineering male of the remaining survivors in the farmhouse. Harry, another male figure who try to apply his strength and ego amongst the group. Helen, is depicted as the unhappy housewife who is semi-defiant to her husband. These portrayals accurately depicted the stereotypes America held during the 1960s, effectively mirroring the time in which it was
George Romero's reinvention of the zombie in night of the Living Dead (1968) is clearly a critique of elements of the American society, and the film as a whole is easily twisted into a warped view on the 'American Dream'. Themes throughout Romero’s film, dealing with controversial topics during the time that the film was made, are still, to this day debated by critics and film historians. Themes of racism and war are defined within the movie, hidden underneath the idea of carnal, cannibalistic zombies and over the top heroes who, eventually, succumb to the reanimated; despite their every effort. These themes are colored over and painted to hide beneath subtle references to the typical American Dream during this time, and Romero does quite the good job at it too. This dream, whilst continuously changing in the everyday lives of modern Americans, can be loosely defined as a national ethos of the United States, or a set of ideals dealing with freedom and the opportunity for success - an upward social status that can be achieved through hard work and effort.
Zombies have become very popular due to their depictions of being easy to kill and being communal. Zombie apocalypses are also very relatable due to the fact that they are set in lives similar to our society and seem easy to overcome. Zombies, themselves, can be identified with because we see ourselves when we look at a zombie. Zombies drudge on through the same task of finding human flesh to consume every day just like we drag ourselves to either class or our job in order to sit through another boring lecture or perform the same menial task every day. Just like the zombie, R, in the book, Warm Bodies, said, “I am Dead, but it’s not so bad. I’ve learned to live with it,” we have learned to succumb to our daily routines and just live with
The zombie race is very different. It doesn't not have many abilities and is not advanced like humans. Their behavior patterns are different. They cannot stand cold or winter weather. Their behavior is very different and difficult to calculate. They usually stand around lingering and waiting to attack when they hear something. They follow noises.Some abilities that they do have is that they have excellent hearing and can walk but aren't blind.The also can smell human blood. Zombies are generally weak but don’t underestimate what they can do to a human.
Set in Los Angeles during the beginning of the zombie outbreak that has destroyed mankind by the time Andrew Lincoln's Rick Grimes wakes from his coma in the original series. Starring Alycia Debnam-Carey (The 100), Kim Dickens, Frank Dillane, Ruben Blades, Lorenzo James Henrie, Mercedes Mason, and Elizabeth Rodriguez (Orange Is the New Black). Fear The Walking Dead airs Sunday nights on AMC.
Compared to the CGI and other special effects that are available today, this film is terrible. Compared to films of its time, I would say it's above average. It is hard to tell, usually films that are --- less reliant on technology/use social problems that are ongoing --- can be enjoyed for many years, unfortunately this was not the case. This was my first film I have seen in this class that I wasn’t much of a fan of. I still realise the historical significance of the movie though, and it was very interesting the see how far the technology used to create the godzilla movies has come. I have seen both the 1998 and 2014 remakes of the movie. The 1998 movie was impressive to me as a kid, not so much now. The 2014 movie was fun to watch because its cast had plenty of actors that I recognized, the storyline was interesting, and the CGI was pretty believable. I’m sure with time the 2014 version of Godzilla’s special effects will be considered sub-par just like the other
Robin William is known for his imitations in movies and he has such a large toolbox of them in this movie. He does Scottish, Hispanic, a few others. So sad that we won’t have another actor like him. I think the fact that they put Ewan McGregor as the leading role in this movie was a wonderful choice. He plays Obi Won Kanobi in Star Wars so he is perfect to be the courageous leading role in this movie.
It is fairly standard horror movie fare. There really weren’t many shots that stood out to me. That is not to say the cinematography is bad. Perhaps it says something about the writing and the characters, just how invested in the i was that i had a hard time noticing any of that stuff. In the end the cinematography and lighting does its job to create a suitably creepy atmosphere.
... He really sold the part and did the part justice. Furthermore in the beginning of the flashback I had no idea who the main character was, but Christian developed the character subtly yet effectively.
same cast as the first Mummy except the couples young son played by Freddie Boath. In
All characters in the movie were played well by the actors in my opinion. They
The sounds and music in this film are very realistic, and to the point. There is not anything abstract or out of place, and everything is very appropriate. The sound effects in the film are diegetic (sounds that the actors can hear), with the score being nondiegetic (sounds that the actors cannot hear). The film falls under the category of realism, with no stylizing or manipulation of images and sounds.
Night of the Living Dead is an all-time classic horror film that took place in 1968, starring Duane Jones and Judith O’Dea. This movie jump started the “zombie apocalypse” hype which led to more and more zombie inspired horror films, but also many different genres of horror films. Night of the Living Dead would not be a horror film if it were not for, obviously the theme, but also the sound effects, special effects, lighting effects, the camera angles and shots, as well as the actor’s ability to strike certain emotions in their audience through the character’s emotions. This film was directed by George A. Romero who also wrote the screenplay, with the help of John A. Russo. From the beginning to end, this film captures its audience leaving
Which feels like a rip-off Night of the Living Dead. Not a call back or a homage, but a straight rip off. Weakening an already weak film. Other than that, not so bad. I really like the character Old Man Cadwell played by Robert Harris and is without at doubt the best part of this film.
The Day After, was viewed in the living room of my house on two occasions. The purpose of viewing this movie is to write a movie critique from my AP U.S. History 3rd block class. The objective of this overall story is to portray the event and effects that would occur if there were to be a nuclear war. The director of The Day After, is Nicholas Myer and the producer is Robert A. Papazian. The three main characters in this film include Dr. Russell Oakes played by Jason Robards, Stephen Klien played by Steve Guttenburg, and Jim Dahlberg played by John Cullum.