Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of nuclear weapons essay
Effects of nuclear weapons essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Out of all the dangerous powers and authority our government wields, possibly the most threatening powers are nuclear weapons. People tend to be frightened by things they do not understand, which make nuclear weapons a perfect catalyst for fear. These weapons have the most overwhelming and destructive power known to man; although, nuclear weapons are only safe in countries that try to maintain harmony and stability. Nuclear weapons are defined as “explosive devices whose destructive potential derives from the release of energy that accompanies the splitting or combining of atomic nuclei.” This power is both dangerous and unstable in the hands of small erratic countries. At this time treaties and laws between the United States and other countries exist in order to prevent a nuclear war. The Limited Test Ban treaty, otherwise known as the Partial Test Ban Treaty, was first signed in 1963 by the U.S.S.R, United Kingdom and the United States. The treaty prohibits testing of Nuclear Weapons in the atmosphere, space, or even underwater. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, adopted in 1996, “bans all nuclear explosions in environments for military or civilian purposes.” Since 2007 only three-fourths of the countries with nuclear reactors or generators have acknowledged the treaty. The treaty will not come into effect until every country with a nuclear generator approves it. Although Barrack Obama has promised in his presidential campaign that the United States would approve the treaty as soon as possible, The United States has yet to ratify the treaty. Although several of these bans have been put in place, these weapons are obtained by various countries illegally through secret sources such as the Black Market. Nuclear terrorism ... ... middle of paper ... ... both themselves and the nation or nations victimized. Radical governments are far less likely to suffer the consequences of their actions, simply because of the cowardly nature of the leaders. The citizens of these countries would be the ones to pay the price for the horrendous actions of their leaders. The danger involved in widespread knowledge of production of nuclear weapons is the likelihood of attack by extremists who would use this knowledge for selfish and ambitious purposes rather than for the common good. Works Cited DeGroot, Gerard J. "The Bomb: A Life." Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005. Rhodes, Richard. "The Making of the Atomic Bomb." New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986. Steeves, Lynne; Moreno-Riano, Gerson. Points of View: Nuclear Proliferation, 2009 Aliprandini, Michael; Goodwin, Chuck. Points of View: Nuclear Proliferation, 2009
In today’s society many countries and even citizens of the United States question the U.S. government’s decision to get in involved in nuclear warfare. These people deemed it unnecessary and state that the U.S. is a hypocrite that preaches peace, but causes destruction and death. Before and during World War II the U.S. was presented with a difficult decision on whether or not to develop and use the atomic bomb.
Symonds, Peter. "World Socialist Web Site ." US think tank report weighs up "grim future' of nuclear war (2013).
2. Leckie, Robert. "131. Hiroshima." Delivered from Evil: The Saga of World War II. New York: Harper & Row, 1987. 938-42. Print.
Sherman, Brad. “Stopping Iran’s Nuclear Program.” Vital Speeches Of The Day 74.2 (2008): 66-68. History Reference Center. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.
“The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.” Calliope. 01 May. 2011: 13. eLibrary. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.
Powers, Thomas. "THE BOMB : Hiroshima: Changing the Way We Think About War." Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, 06 Aug. 1995. Web. 10 Jan. 2014.
Sullivan, Edward T. The Ultimate Weapon: The Race to Develop the Atomic Bomb. New York: Holiday House, 2007.
The continuous spread of nuclear technology and nuclear weapons is a threat for national security and the safety of the entire planet. The inextricable link between nuclear energy and nuclear power is arguably the greatest danger of nuclear power. The same low-enriched uranium that is processed in a nuclear power plant is the same uranium used to make nuclear weapons. Nuclear power plants are the contributors to these mass destruction weapon capable of wiping out the human race. An article published by the World Nuclear Stockpile Report says, “ Nine countries in the world posses a total of 15,375 nuclear weapons.
In the late summer of 1945 the decision was made to vaporize over 70,000 Japanese civilians with a single nuclear payload dropped on a city possessing virtually no strategic value. It is estimated over 100,000 more civilians died as a direct result of this bombing in the years that followed. The rationalizations and excuses made to justify the act are myriad. Some say that it saved lives, that it shortened the war. Others say it was justified revenge for the Japanese attack on the naval base at Pearl Harbor. The truth is that the United States felt a need to showcase its nuclear dominance to the world. There will never be a legitimate justification for this bombing, which to this day remains the most destructive singular act carried out by human beings against other human beings. The most evil invention in history is nuclear weaponry, a shockingly destructive force that has the capacity to level an entire city, and reduce its population to ash and bone. Nuclear warfare has not taken place since the last days of World War II, yet this is not for lack of nuclear capabilities. In the decades following there has been a proliferation of nuclear capability despite the knowledge that if one nuclear device were to be used, the consequences and implications would be likely irreparable. Nuclear war has the potential for extinction of the human race, yet no genuine attempts at moving towards a complete nuclear disarmament are being made. The amount of nations with nuclear capabilities is unconscionable; yet the number will only increase with the greatest of these nations unwilling to consider a complete nuclear disarmament. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Volti, Rudi. “Atomic Bomb.” The Facts on File Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Society. Vol. 1. New York: Facts On File, 1999. Modern World History Online. Web. 4 Apr. 2012. .
Ronald E. Powaski, March to Armageddon: The United States and the Nuclear Arms Race, 1939 to the Present, (Oxford: OUP, 1987), 107.
You may be familiar with the international treaty banning the use of nuclear weapons in space.” “The Outer Space Treaty. A relic of the Cold War, passed in the sixties. Well, I suppose it’s still relevant.”
Governments from other countries should be able to work things out and settle business without fearing that someone will be threatened with a nuclear war. These weapons have a very high percent of total destruction, other countries do not think about when they use these fatal weapons as an excuse, of what they will really do when sending the bombs off. They are only thinking of defending themselves no matter what the consequences are, little do they know that it could come back and bite them in the butt. Nuclear weapons will not only cause destruction to one country but all of them. Banning these dangerous weapons will make sure that these excuses will no longer be a problem to the world, countries and nations will not have to fear if they are putting the entire world in
Scott D. Sagan, the author of chapter two of “More Will Be Worse”, looks back on the deep political hostilities, numerous crises, and a prolonged arms race in of the cold war, and questions “Why should we expect that the experience of future nuclear powers will be any different?” The author talks about counter arguments among scholars on the subject that the world is better off without nuclear weapons. In this chapter a scholar named Kenneth Waltz argues that “The further spread of nuclear weapons may well be a stabilizing factor in international relations.” He believes that the spread of nuclear weapons will have a positive implications in which the likely-hood of war decreases and deterrent and defensive capabilities increase. Although there
A fascinating new advancement towards the protection of the world from nuclear weapons occurred on February 25, 2016 at the State Department in Washington. According to a news article found on The New York Times Website , China and the United States have come to an agreement to a resolution that would impose strict sanctions on North Korea, a country that has become a nuclear threat over the last couple decades. The sanctions would ban the trade of potentially threatening weapons as well as fuel to North Korea, “The proposed measures, according to a U.S. official, would ban the trade of conventional weapons, luxury goods like jet skis and Rolex watches, and aviation fuel to north Korea, which would effectively ground its airlines” . The resolution is a direct product from the events occurring a few weeks earlier when North Korea’s capital Pyongyang tested a hydrogen bomb, an extremely dangerous weapon.