Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Second amendment and the success of our nation
Essay gun control history united states mla scribd
Gun ownership decreases crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Second amendment and the success of our nation
Guns today are seen as horrible creations. To most families in america, guns are a taboo subject. Most Americans feel as if though guns should be outlawed. What people fail to realize is that guns aren’t bad! Guns are good for the country, and the community. The Bill of Rights are amendments that, “guarantee a number of personal freedoms”. The Bill of Rights was drafted to give the citizens of this great country personal freedoms which no government power can take away, unless under special circumstances. What is really important, and great about the right to bear arms, is the fact that it is the second amendment. The first being the right to free speech, religion, and press etc. This means that the founding fathers prioritized the right to bear arms. There is a reason why the right to bear arms is the second amendment and not the 10th. People need to have the right to defend themselves …show more content…
In fact, a study conducted at Harvard University showed that, “the more guns a nation has the less crime it tends to have. In other words, there is a very strong positive correlation between more guns and less crime. This is the exact opposite of what the mainstream media would have us believe, but it makes sense. You see, the reality is that criminals really, really, really don't want to get shot.” (18 Little known gun facts). As stated in the quote, criminals just don’t want to get shot. In a country with more gun owners, the crime rate significantly drops as a result of more people having the means of self defense. The same article also states, “The places with the highest crime rates are the major cities where strict gun control laws have been passed.” (18 L.K.G.F.). When people have firearms, the country is a much safer place. Criminals think more of their actions and their outcomes, and decide not to mess with someone who owns and is carrying a firearm on their
In America guns have been a part of the country’s society since it’s birth. Throughout history the citizens of the US have used firearms to protect the nation, protect their families, hunt for food and engage in sporting activities. The issue of Guns and gun control is complex. Weighing the rights and liberties of the individual against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a precarious balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these tumultuous issues that has both sides firmly entrenched in their positions. Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms, rely on the fact that the provision for such rights is enshrined in their constitution. In this climate of growing violence, rife with turmoil and crime, gun advocates feel more than ever that their position is justified. As citizens of the “Land of the Free” possessing a gun is a fundamental right, and may even be a necessity... Anti- gun lobbyists point to the same growing violence and gun related crimes in an effort to call on the government to take action. By enacting more laws and stricter control, these people not in favor of guns feel society would be better safer.
Firstly, the claims that guns contributing to higher crime rates are completely over exaggerated. Most people are spoon-fed by the mainstream media that guns contribute to higher crime rates. In fact, in large cities like Chicago it has been proven that laws like handgun bans have worsened crime rather than alleviate it. When they did this in Chicago, politicians were hoping that this would bring crime levels down (Peterson 25). In the midst of all this, everyone as soon as the politicians proclaimed it would work, was singing their praises and saying that it would, or so they thought. So did the handgun ban succeed? Not necessarily, the article A Splendid, Precarious Victory proves this point. The author Dan Peterson provides very gut wrenching statistics. It states, “in recent years, while the handgun ban was in place, the percentage committed with handguns has consistently been 70 percent or more” (Peterson 25). Clearly, this proves that the mainstream media, anti-gun groups and politicians have distorted the truth about just how hazardous gun control is. This disturbing information should be a wake up call to those who feel that gun control works. Finally, this proves that gun control is unproductive. These kinds of laws ...
Imagine... you are driving down the street to see your loving family. You stop at a gas station and a guy comes in. He has a bandana and bad intentions. All of a sudden, he loads a pistol and aims it towards you. What are your options? Try to visualize, a guy going to see his wife and kids, but when out of nowhere a person pulls you aside and then points a pistol at you. Over the course of years, ninety-three United States citizens are killed with guns. Due to these reasons, it seems it is necessary to get rid of guns because of the 21,175 suicides, 505 deaths due to accidental/ negligent discharge of a firearm. Guns should be banned for civilian use, due to too many deaths from unregistered users, misuse, and increased crime rate.
Some people think that states that allow citizens to carry guns only raises the crime rate in that state. Studies have actually shown that states that allow citizens to carry guns actually have a lower crime rate. States that allow citizens to carry guns have actually shown to lower murder rates from 5.6 killings per 100,000 people to 4.2.
A good example of this is Chicago. Even with such strict gun laws, Chicago is at the top of the list with over 500 homicides involving guns in 2012. Since guns are being restricted to people, it is easier for guns to come into the city from other places instead. There are more guns in the streets of Chicago than in Los Angeles and New York. In 2012, the police confiscated 7,400 guns in crimes. This alone makes you think that maybe if guns are taken away then violence will increase. Well another point a gun activist made is that "guns are not the root of the crime problem” (D 'Agostino) and should not be seen as the real problem when it comes to all these deaths in the United States. Instead that the real problem is all the factors that lead up to the violence such as poverty, mental health, and failing
John Luik author of the article “The Increased Availability of Guns Reduces Crime” and Sabina Thaler the author of the article “The Claim of Increased Gun Availability Reduces Crime is Unfounded” are two examples of people having different opinions on such a debatable topic. Both authors talk about guns taking people’s lives, Thalers article focuses on guns taking innocent people’s lives, and Luiks article focuses on guns being innocent people’s protection. Many gun supporters will say that more guns will bring down the crime rate. These same believers will give facts stating that the more guns in a state, the less likely gun owners will use them. “The chances of innocent people being the victims of violent crime, including murder, decrease—not increase—when access to guns is made easier” (Luik).
The government only did this when it conducted research that concluded that the more gun owners there are, the more violent crime there is. So in theory if you reduce the amount of gun owners there are, then the crime rate will go down. You may ask why i bring up a point that goes against my views. There was a major flaw in australia's research. It took statistics from the ENTIRE POPULATION OF THE WORLD(which was roughly 6 billion in 1996). In 1997 great britain banned civilians possession of almost all handguns in response to the dunblane massacre.(18 deaths including the criminal and 15 non fatal injuries, 18 deaths=16 children, one teacher,criminal. Let also remember the florida shooter killed 17 people, not including himself) today in britain, there is more violence and crime then compared in 1996 when the gun laws were passed. In switzerland the government encourages its citizen to own firearms. Switzerland has one of the lowest crime rates in the world(total of 40% crime decrease between the Vaud and Geneva regions 2000-2017). But surprisingly for every 100 citizens….only 21 people own a gun. So ~650,000 people own
There is an American consensus for some form of gun control. “…[F]irearms were involved in two-thirds of all murders in the United States and [t]he United States leads the world's richest nations in gun deaths…murders, suicides, and accidental deaths due to guns - according to a study published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the International Journal of Epidemiology” (Lepore). There might be some far extreme people who think that all guns should be banned but most sane Americans do not think that gun rights should be abolished. Americans regard self-defense as the most compelling reason to have a gun and twenty-two percent of households have handguns in the United States. However many people do think that gun control laws must be enacted and enforced. Pro-gun extremists and the National Rifle Association’s (NRA) must understand that there is a real for many people at the uncontrolled s...
Does gun control reduce crime rates? Actually, gun control does not significantly reduce crime. In fact, strict gun control regulations do not stop criminals from getting guns because only law-abiding citizens comply with the law. In contrast, criminals do not obey gun control laws just as they do not obey many other laws. Gun advocates argue that less available guns results in less crime, however research has shown the opposite. Gun control is an ineffective way of reducing crime because gun control does not target the underlying causes of crime.
Increasing gun control will not decrease crime. However, if we change the way we punish crime we may be able to change the way people look at crime and stop them from committing them. When thinking about crime the first thing that comes to mind is gun control. The problem is not the laws we have about guns, it is that they laws are not being followed. Criminals do not follow the laws and do not go about getting weapons legally. Adding more gun control laws to an already confusing situation, only prevents the law abiding citizens their rights to protect themselves.
Guns are bad in society. Guns in this society are extremely malignant , because of the death rate from gun shot. Mark Twain made a good point. "The young will shoot and kill their own family, but if told to hit a cathedral with a Gatling gun they wouldn't hit". Twain
Those who argue for gun control usually state guns are a part of most violent crimes. However, this is not always true. While it is true that limiting gun ownership with laws could prevent individuals from possessing guns, it does not prevent people from illegally having or using guns. Those who carry guns legally are not the problem. According to Mark Gius, the author of “Gun Ownership and the Gun Control Index”, “…only about 25% of total violent crime is committed by a person using a gun, no inferences...
At the same time firearms ownership increased sharply by over 61% or over 118 million between 2004 and 2012 (Dietz). So according to these numbers less guns doesn’t mean less crime, if anything the presence of more guns inhibits more
Crime is a large issue in that occurs throughout the United States. People have used guns as a tool to committed crimes, therefore guns contribute to the crime in the United states. As a result guns should have increased regulations, but not be completely removed from society because extracting guns will not eliminate violence in the country. Guns should not be taken away because then law abiding citizens will be negatively affected. For example if there is a ban on guns the criminals can still obtain guns due to the fact that criminals participate in illegal activities such as the black market. According to PBS criminals acquire guns from “legally licensed but corrupt at-home and commercial gun dealers.” This expands on the fact that criminals
Just like the 2nd amendment, the right to “bear arms” tells us as citizens that we have the right to protect ourselves. If we feel that we are in danger, we do have the right to protect ourselves. There is no need to break a law when you have a right to protect yourselves if you feel in danger. This law is keeping control of how you can protect yourself. There is a thing called The Harm Principle, the laws were created under the this principle are written to protect people from being harmed by others. Without basic laws like the Harm Principle, a society would ultimately degenerates into despotism. Without the laws the strong and violent would take over the weal and nonviolent. There are many principles and laws that do keep the society together and without them, society will eventually fall apart. Having these laws are essential to our society in