What Are The Factors That Juries Should Take Into Account When They Sentence Juveniles

252 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Impact of media on teenagers

5. The factors that I think juries should take into account when they sentence juveniles, is there; age, crime, sciological state, home life, and even parents. Juries should take the age of of juvinelies into consideration, if they are olden to know right from wrong and the crime was serious I beleieve they should be judged like adulyts. Also though juries need to take the sciological state of the juvineall into account. As well as if they come from a bad home with horrible parents. 4. Technology is helping us understand the teenage brain becuase it is allowing us to explore what makes teenage act the way they do. Also with technology we are able to see how teenagers act in different situations. Also video games even help show us how teenagers act, think, and recat to situations. …show more content…

Teenagers often act on impulses. Teenagers are still young and in between the adult and tenn stage. This often leaves teenagers emotions and acts to but unpridicatble and to fir them to act on impulse. 2. This is a hard question, it is a yes and no for serious crimes yes I do believe for like murder, or felonies, or other serious crimes I do believe that juveniles “tried as adults”. 1. I do think at times that the jurors should take the age of a criminal into consideration. If the criminal is a juvenile they should and need to take consideration there age and the crime they committed before deciding there

Show More
Related

  • Juvenile Justice From Both Sides Of The Bench Analysis

    185 Words  | 1 Pages

    The article titled “ Juvenile Justice from Both Sides of the Bench”, published by PBS, and written by Janet Tobias and Michael Martin informs readers on numerous judges’ opinions on the juveniles being tried as adults. Judge Thomas Edwards believed that juveniles should not be tried as adults because they are still not mature enough to see the consequences of their actions and have a chance to minimize this behavior through rehabilitation programs. Judge LaDoris Cordell argues that although we shouldn’t give up on juveniles and instead help them be a part of society, however, she believes that some sophisticated teens that create horrible crimes should be tried as adults. Bridgett Jones claims that teens think differently than adults and still

    Read More

  • Incarceration in An Adult Prison Increases Juvenile Crime

    1754 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the last 42 years little to no changes have been made to correct the standards that govern punitive measures towards juvenile delinquency. Today juvenile law is governed by state and many states have enacted a juvenile code. However, in numerous cases, juveniles are transferred to adult court when juvenile courts waive or relinquish jurisdiction. Adolescents should not be tried in the adult court system or sentenced to adult penitentiary's on account of: teen brains are not mature which causes a lack of understanding towards the system, incarceration in an adult facility increases juvenile crime, and children that are sentenced to adult prison are vulnerable to abuse and rape.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography On Why Juveniles Should Be Tried As Adults

    615 Words  | 2 Pages

    The central idea of this article is to show the two sides of the prompt ¨should Juveniles be tried as adults?¨ This article uses a lot of stories to help back herself up in her answer. The authority with the author/creator is trustworthy because, Jessica Reaves works for a trustworthy place ¨Time¨ The difficult part of trusting the accuracy of the article is, it was published in 2001 which could have a lot of changes in roughly 15 or 16 years. The article uses examples of juvenile violence to prove the point that kids are treated differently from adults. Readers can use this article to prove that kids are incapable of understanding the consequences of their action.

    Read More

  • Juveniles Should Not Be Prison

    1015 Words  | 3 Pages

    How immature juveniles are not known. But what we do know that they are indeed immature, and cannot control their actions at times. Teens do not think at times as Marjie Lundstrom says in her article Kids Are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes from the Sacramento Bee, published March 1, 2001 “...Tate supposedl...

    Read More

  • A Look at the Conflicts of the Juvinile Court System in “No Matter How Loud I Shout” by Edward Humes

    1392 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many people say that the systems first priority should be to protect the public from the juvenile criminals that are a danger to others. Once the juveniles enter the system there is however, arguments on what should be done with them. Especially for those deemed too dangerous to be released back to their parents. Some want them locked away for as long as possible without rehabilitation, thinking that it will halt their criminal actions. One way to do this they argue would be to send them into an adult court. This has been a large way to reform the juvenile system, by lowering the age limits. I believe in certain cases this is the best method for unforgiving juveniles convicted of murder, as in the case of Ronald Duncan, who got away with a much lesser sentence due to his age. However another juvenile, Geri Vance, was old enough to be sent into the adult court, which caused him t...

    Read More

  • Juveniles Tried as Adults

    1188 Words  | 3 Pages

    There has always been controversies as to whether juvenile criminals should be tried as adults or not. Over the years more and more teenagers have been involved in committing crimes. In some cases the juries have been too rough on the teens. Trying teens as adults can have a both positive and negative views. For example, teens that are detained can provide information about other crimes, can have an impact in social conditions, and serve as experience; however, it can be negative because teens are still not mature enough for that experience, they are exposed to adult criminals; and they will lose out on getting an education.

    Read More

  • Greg Ousley Is Sorry For Killing His Parents Essay

    728 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even though juveniles brains’ aren't developed at the age they committed the crime, they should be able to differentiate between what is right and what is wrong. However, four justices strongly agree, mandatory sentences reflected the will of America society that heinous crimes committed by juveniles should always be punished. The majority of Supreme Court justices who argued to abolish mandatory life in prison for juveniles. Researchers around the world agree with this statement because juveniles don't have a fully developed brain or have rough homes. Many juveniles have don't first degree misers and second degree murders. I stand against abolishing mandatory life in prison. In my opinion Juveniles, depending on the the crime should be sentenced

    Read More

  • Juvenile Punishment: Should Adolescents Be Tried As Adults?

    688 Words  | 2 Pages

    Most Americans today believe that teenagers are more apathetic because of the crimes they commit. According to an adolescent brain development expert, Laurence Steinberg, "The adolescent brain is still developing [and] the risks taken and mistakes made by young offenders may be more outside of their control than we think” (Steinberg 1).  With that said, should teenagers be responsible for their actions and be tried as adults? Absolutely, because as Kiley Hamlin stated, "The researchers have found that babies as young as six months old already make moral judgements, and they think we may be born with a moral code hard-wired into our brains" (Hamlin 1). Therefore, teenagers should be held accountable for their actions and tried as adults because these violent crimes are premeditated, against the law, and if a teenager has the mental capability to plan a violent crime, they should have the mental capability to acknowledge the consequences of the crime.

    Read More

  • Should Juveniles Be Responsible For Their Actions: Juveniless And The Death Penalty

    718 Words  | 2 Pages

    Do you think juveniles should be held responsible for their actions? For many years, children have been sentenced to death without trial. Young people are not capable of making rational decisions. Hence, children are restricted from doing many things. For instance, children under the age eighteen are not allowed by law to vote, and work for a certain number of hours. However, when it comes to sentencing children as adults to the death penalty, it is not illegal. If children are viewed differently from adults by law, then why is that not the case when being trialed? Moreover, children are not yet matured to receive such punishments. Likewise, juveniles should not be sentenced to death, because they are still

    Read More

  • Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults

    1492 Words  | 3 Pages

    Juveniles deserve to be tried the same as adults when they commit certain crimes. The justice systems of America are becoming completely unjust and easy to break through. Juvenile courts haven’t always been known to the everyday person.

    Read More

  • Ethical Issues Of Juvenile Incarceration

    1099 Words  | 3 Pages

    It has been found that juvenile brains are not yet fully developed. The parts of the brain specifically still changing during the teen years include the brain circuitry involved in emotional responses and impulsive responses. Teen emotional reactions are intense and urgent (National Institute

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Being Prosecuted As Adults

    1059 Words  | 3 Pages

    Eight years old children are being prosecuted as adults and are being sentenced (Johnson). We believe that children under the age of 8-16 should not have to be prosecuted as an adult. Many of these kids have a variety of reasons of doing what they are doing should their loved ones have to suffer, should their life be taken from them. No and for these reasons I will discuss below will show why youths shouldn’t be prosecuted as adults.

    Read More

  • Juveniles Should Be Tried as Adults

    2004 Words  | 5 Pages

    "Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time." -- David Grusin and Morgan Ames Much controversy exists on the question of whether a juvenile criminal should be punished to the same extent as an adult. Those who commit capital crimes, including adolescents, should be penalized according to the law. Age should not be a factor in the case of serious crimes.

    Read More

  • Should Juveniles Be Prison For Life?

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    Should juveniles be trial as an adult after committing a heinous crime and sentenced to life? As a teenager, this question if far complicated to answer due that I am a teenager yet in my opinion, I believe that the juvenile should not be sentenced to life. I believe that there 's other way to punish them for their crimes. The last execution was in 2006 in California. On June 2012, the supreme court of justice ruled that juveniles cannot be sentenced to life in prison. On July 2014, in California the death penalty was removed. The 8th amendment banned the use of cruel or punishments. The reason why this rule have been imposed or banned was because many believed that they deserve a second chance. There are many reasons why juveniles commit crimes such as murder.

    Read More

  • Causes and Effects of Teenage Rebellion

    644 Words  | 2 Pages

    Firstly, everyone has gone or will go through the teenage rebellion phase. No matter how good of a person you think you are, you have probably rebelled against an elder person at least once. Once hormones have revealed it-self, children turn into confused young adults that think they can do everything by themselves and that there will be no longer any need of nurture from adults. The word “young” from “Young adults” are what teenagers completely ignore, when actually they should do the opposite and ignore the “adults” part.

    Read More

More about What Are The Factors That Juries Should Take Into Account When They Sentence Juveniles

Open Document