Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Methods on research writing essay
Methods on research writing essay
Methods on research writing essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Christopher Gillen’s chapter “The Data Suggest” in “They Say/I Say: The moves that matter in Academic Writing”, Gillen (2010) addresses to the readers his rendition of the correct way to present scientific writing. He first explains that in order to convincingly portray the author’s point about the scientific issue that they either agree with, disagree with is to begin with the data. He states , “Data are the fundamental currency of scientific argument” (Gillen, 2010, pg. 204). Meaning, in order to appear knowledgeable and to open an argument at all, the data, including their numbers, methods and conclusion, from previously existing theories and from the author’s own experiment is crucial to present in the writing. Gillen claims that by
Steve Sheinkin, award-winning author, in his novel Bomb: The Race to Build- and Steal- the World’s Most Dangerous Weapon (2012) addresses the topic of nuclear war and proves that no matter what actions are taken (during war) there will be negative outcomes by depicting the characters with anxiety, describing horror-filled battle scenes and revealing the thirst for power during these times. Sheinkin supports his claim by using memorable moments in the novel such as when the bomb is dropped on Hiroshima and the entire city is close to being wiped out; also when Stalin is upset that the Americans completed the atomic bomb which leads to another race of building upwards
The most successful approaches to the public’s acceptance of scientific information are the cues from political leaders, persuasive syntax, the use of narratives, and research into a scientific source’s
That alone provides a great source of credibility to the paper. The idea that this is an author who has done the research, gathered the numbers, and analyzed the data, allows the reader to rest in the idea that they are reading a valid article, and receiving good, hard, evidence. Twenge also uses a very logical tone throughout her article, maintaining the idea that the data is as clear as day, and that there is no disproving it; the numbers show true facts.
In the first article, Some Students Rebel Against Healthy School Lunches, their claim is USDA offering seconds on fruits and vegetables did not solve the conflict. The reporters claim is valid because they give facts and statistics to help explain the argument. Overall their argument was logos and not pathos. The text says, “ The week before, all 111 vegetable containers served were thrown away.” This shows they are trying to reduce the obesity but it isn’t helping because the kids are still going through the container of food fast. This is good evidence because it is logos, it gives good evidence to back up their claim , and it is not opinions it is statistics. Overall , the reporter of the first article, Some Students Rebel Against Healthy School Lunches, did a good job of backing up their argument,
This is something I would like to take away and infuse into my own writing, because I normally rely on facts to sway my reader, but I now see that presenting an opposing view can prove that one’s own argument would be strong enough to stand against doubt. It is like testing the foundation of a home you build yourself, how will you know if it is strong if the wind doesn’t blow? I would also like employ the pattern Primack uses to present his evidence. He layers facts along with quotes from the personal accounts of individuals who have an understanding of the topic, so it makes their words relevant. I feel as though this creates an argument that appeals emotionally, is relevant, and supported by accurate
Women’s Brains deals with the abuse of scientific data in order to “prove” negative social analyses with prejudiced groups such as women, blacks, and poor people. Evolutionary biologist Stephen Gould points out the flaws in the scientific methods of various scientists and correctly asserts that many scientists incorrectly used anthropometric data to support social analyses that degrade prejudiced groups.
Well explained data is another essential criterion to successful nonfiction books because they give the credible data that proves the authors claim and helps them understand what the author is trying to persuade them of. The data if well explained helps the reader understand difficult concepts that may be hard for them to grasp and it also helps convince the reader about the author’s claim. Furthermore it establishes a credible ethos for the author as they have hard proof backing their claim.
Any hypothesis, Gould says, begins with the collection of facts. In this early stage of a theory development bad science leads nowhere, since it contains either little or contradicting evidence. On the other hand, Gould suggests, testable proposals are accepted temporarily, furthermore, new collected facts confirm a hypothesis. That is how good science works. It is self-correcting and self-developing with the flow of time: new information improves a good theory and makes it more precise. Finally, good hypotheses create logical relations to other subjects and contribute to their expansion.
Text A uses quotes from professionals with specialist knowledge to convince the reader that the information must be true because a specialist has said so for example Research by Imperial College London that soari...
As I read through “Revisualizing Composition” by several different authors, different ideas and thoughts came to my mind. For me, as being a student writer, I can understand why the data they gather is what they got. If I were to take the survey I would have put texting, lecture notes, lists, academic papers, research papers for the most frequently written genres I use. I am texting from the minute I wake up to the minute I go to sleep. I take notes every day in class. I make up to 10 lists a day of what I need to do, what homework I need to do, and so on. I have to write papers all the time for school. I want to become a scientist; to become a scientist means there will be many times I will have to write a research paper. For me I use texting, lecture notes, lists, academic papers, research papers for the most frequently written genres.
Overall, Nick Naylor and Dr. Alfred Kinsey took interesting stands on supporting issues that many would not dare to speak or act upon. Each used persuasive points whether they used data or not to illustrate points. They did step the fine line on moral ground, but did an extraordinary of standing behind them. Whether if a fictional or fact based characters there is a lot to learn from the dynamic characteristics each have. From Nick Naylor, “the beauty of argument,” (TYFS) does exist, and for Dr. Kinsey data makes a difference when proving a point, though many will not agree.
Supporting inspiration with data - making extensive, aggressive use of data and testing to support ideas according to a Harvard case study people aren't allowed to say 'I think' but instead must say 'The data suggest...'
I will put evidence everywhere around this essay. I will put a few words in the end of the introduction paragraph, telling people what to expect in the essay. I will constantly be talking about the evidence throughout the body of the essay. I will revise what I have been writing about in the conclusion paragraph. This will hopefully keep people interested in the essay until the end.
In previous english classes, most assignments consisted of a general summary of the text with little interpretation. Thesis statements and evidence were used mostly to prove that "I read the text" rather than to support any type of argument. However, my experience was much different this semester. Focusing on poetry, short stories, and drama, the essays assigned for this class required me to concentrate heavily on analysis and argumentation. Focusing on these elements allowed me to draft stronger theses supported by interpretation of evidence. Through my positive writing experiences in English 1102, I have become more confident in my ability to analyze literature, interpret evidence and develop strong theses. However, I continue to struggle with
Methods of data collection are expected to differ but however some are similar. The questionnaire for example can be used to garner information for both qualitative and quantitative research. In both scenarios people can be dispatched into a subject area so they observe and draw conclusion of either numeric or theoretic data they could have obtained. As such this similarity in methods for data collection is good enough justification that these two are also to an extent