Theme Of Personhood In Brave New World

990 Words2 Pages

The novel titled Brave New World was written by Aldous Huxley in 1931. It is a work of science fiction that focuses on humans being born in a futuristic and artificial way. Personhood is the basis for this novel. Three examples of Huxley’s personhood are the lacking of individuality, being incredibly social and busy, and understanding that no one person belongs to an individual.
One example of personhood is not having individuality. People are predestined to be in groups, and in each group has gone through some experience to make them not like something. For example, the Betas are to agree that “Delta children wear khaki. Oh no, I don’t want to play with Delta children. And Epsilons are still worse…” (27). The predestination takes away …show more content…

They have a proverb which is stated thousands of times, “every one belongs to every one else” (40). People do not care so much about monogamist relationships. Romance is no longer something that people have or do. Huxley writes, “these poor pre-moderns were mad and wicked and miserable. Their world didn’t allow them to take things easily, didn’t allow them to be sane, virtuous, happy” (41). This sense of no emotion makes this world a better place because everyone is happy. Monogamy is something that causes things to be unstable, and everything in this world is about stability because “[n]o civilization without social stability. No social stability without individual stability” (42). Since every individual is artificially made, the Predestiners have control over the stability of the …show more content…

She would consider those people to be sub-men which are people who “have eyes and ears, but from their childhood on they make themselves blind and deaf, without love and without desire” (338). Each person in the World State society cannot think for him or herself because every human being goes under different tests to dislike something. There is no freedom in the World State. When freedom is present, a person can make a choice. They do not recognize freedom, and they do not recognize choice.
In another example in Beauvoir’s reading is how the serious man never questions anything. The serious man only acts and does what he is told. She writes, “Bit the serious man puts nothing into question. For the military man, the army is useful” (341). The World State has taken hundreds of books around that are important to history. Since children do not know history, they do not question. Asking questions is what drives advances in almost every subject. If people did not ask question and assumed everything one man said is right, then everyone would be the same. There would be no

Open Document