The Way in Which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different
There were two different types of groups that were trying to get the
vote for women. These were The Suffragists and The Suffragettes. They
were similar in the way that they both wanted the vote for women, but
were very different in the tactics that were used for this. The
Suffragists were formed in 1890's, and they believed in peaceful
methods of campaigning. The Suffragettes were formed in 1903 and they
believed in more extreme methods of campaigning. In this essay I am
going to look at the different tactics used by both groups. I will be
starting by looking at the tactics used by The Suffragists.
The Suffragists who were formed in the 1890's, were led by a woman
called Millicent Fawcett, The Suffragists believed in peaceful methods
of campaigning. Millicent Fawcett wrote in 1911 that she wanted the
NUWSS to show the world how to gain reforms without violence, without
killing people and blowing up buildings and doing the other silly
things that men have done when they wanted the laws altered. The
Suffragists issued leaflets, collecting petitions and held meetings.
They also met with politicians and argued their case. At election
times they helped any candidate who supported women's suffrage. By
1900 more than half MP's said they wanted to give the vote to women.
Millicent Fawcett said that her movement was 'like a glacier'. It
might be slow moving, but it was powerful and unstoppable. She
believed that in the end and its tactics would get woman the vote. In
1905 The Suffragists, ran meetings in almost all constituencies in the
run-up to the General Election. In 1907, they held their first
procession. In 1908, they led a deputation to see the prime minister.
In 1909, Fawcett held a public debate with her opponents, and in 1910,
The Suffragists raised a petition of 180,000 signatures. These are
examples of the tactics the suffragists used to try and gain the vote
for the women. However The Suffragists used very different tactics to
The focus of chapter one is on the tactics employed by the suffragist movement and highlights the importance of a parliamentary
A women suffrage amendment was brought to the U.S. Congress in 1868 but failed to win support as well as a second amendment in 1878. In 1869 a woman named Elizabeth Cady Stanton got together with Susan B. Anthony, a women’s rights activist, and organized an association called the National Woman Suffrage Association. With this union they would gather with women and fight for women’s suffrage. Later, in 1890 they joined with their competitor the American Women Suffrage Association and became the National American Women Suffrage Association. “NAWSA adopted a moderate approach to female suffrage, eschewing some of the more radical feminism of other women’s rights groups in favor of a national plan designed to gain widespread support” (3). What the association did was they changed their initial tactic towards suffrage for women so that they can be able to obtain support from all over. Having little to no movement on the national front, suffragists took the next step to sate level. That was when Eastern states granted women suffrage, but hadn’t spread to Western states.
What is the difference between a. and a. The suffragists believed that although a woman's place was in the home, she should be able to influence laws which impacted that home. 2. What is the difference between a.. Voting rights for women became an international law in 1948 when the United Nations (UN). adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Suffragists meant that they preferred to take action by moral force. The name of the other group was the WSPU they were known as the suffragettes. They were members of the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU). Founded in Manchester in 1903 by the Pankhurst family, the approach was very different from the NUWSS. The suffragettes liked to take action with physical force as well as moral force.
Although they were fighting for a worthy cause, many did not agree with these women’s radical views. These conservative thinkers caused a great road-block on the way to enfranchisement. Most of them were men, who were set in their thoughts about women’s roles, who couldn’t understand why a woman would deserve to vote, let alone want to vote. But there were also many women who were not concerned with their fundamental right to vote. Because some women were indifferent in regards to suffrage, they set back those who were working towards the greater good of the nation. However, the suffragettes were able to overcome these obstacles by altering their tactics, while still maintaining their objective.
The Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes The terms "Suffragist" and "Suffragette" began to be used when the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) and the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU) began to start fighting for the right of women to vote in general elections. Although the two sets of franchise fighters were fighting for the same cause, their methods of doing so were completely different. The Suffragists were peaceful, and were the original members of the NUWSS.
During the beginning of the 20th century, the increase activity of the National Union Of Women attractive additional support of the suffrage movement. “However, it was possible to criticize the policy and tactics of the constitutional suffragist on several grounds. It was argued that the suffragists should have revolted in 1884, when the amendment to the reform bill of that year failed through the opposition of the liberal leadership, but the suffragists were too well mannered to do more protesting and concentrate all of their efforts on one private members bill.” The women suffrage’s organization could not force the political parties to adopt the cause of women’s suffrage and need a major party to pick up their campaign or there was no hope of a government bill. Women’s suffrages leaders saw that they need more of a drastic tactics to gain public awareness. Women started protesting by undergoing violence methods and tactics however, the National Union Of Women believed that any aggression or violence acts of protesting would only weaken the movement. These actions would persuade male’s voters that women are too emotional and thus could not be trusted with the responsible of voting. These gentle ways of protesting was unconvincing, as many political believed would give up or lose interests. The lack of actions cause many women to take strongest methods of protesting their rights and formed a more violent group called Suffragettes.
During the late 1800s and early 1900s the American movement for Women’s Suffrage grew stronger until it couldn’t be ignored for any longer. Throughout this fifty year time span American women fought for the right to vote and eventually obtained their goal. Probably the most invaluable of the suffragists were Alice Paul and Carrie Chapman Catt, who fought relentlessly for their cause. Their contributions to the movement helped gain the support they needed to for women to vote.
The constitutional societies felt obliged to reject "militants" their membership and even issued strongly-advocated protests against the use of violence for political publicity. This difference caused a great split in the suffrage movement. The UNSSW considered that the WSPU were wrong and that "direct action," as referred to the violent approaches, had always reacted unfavorably on those who employed it. When the constitutional societies began to express freely their views on these points, the suffragettes naturally responded by attempting to break up their gatherings, shouting down their speakers and inciting chaos. As opposition to the militant campaign increased, the WSPU’s emphasis on the oppression of all women as a sex increased. It led to increasing distrust of all men, countering the attitudes of the rest of the suffrage movement from the NUWSS, who could also criticise male domination over women but felt that class had to come into consideration as well. In 1913, a publication of Christabel Pankhurst disclosed the real reason for the opposition of votes for women – the fear that women’s suffrage would result in a rigid code of sexual morals. With the widespread use of the motto ‘Votes for Women and Chastity for Men’, women’s suffrage became a conservative moral
Millicent Fawcett, one of the founders of the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies, published a poster in July 1913 in the NUWS’s name called ‘what does women’s suffrage mean?’ shown as source C, it was made to promote the message of the suffragettes campaign while encouraging the people to become a part of the movement. It was anticipated that by clearly highlighting and setting out the reasons why women should have the right to vote, people would support and sympathise for the cause. The manifesto includes reasons such as ‘only a small number of women do these violent acts’ - this supports the argument of Marcie Kligman that some of the suffragettes actions put people off the cause, hence the reason why this poster explicitly confirms
On 19th May 1905, 10 women went to speak to the Prime Minister. One of
Treating people with equality and respect is important because without it women wouldn’t have as many rights as they do now and including the African Americans.
A lady by the name of Emmeline Pankhurst founded the women's social and political union in 1903. The followers she had were responsible for relentless petitioning of the politicians, practicing civil disobedience and often arrested for starting riots. Women were disrespected in many ways. They were barely allowed to speak in public. A young lady in the mid-1800s stood on a platform speaking to a crowd, which was a very surprising sight for people. Some men listened because they were curious. Others listened to her because they wanted to taunt at the things she would say. Some of them even threw mud at the speaker. But nevertheless the women still fought for their right to vote. The names of them were the American Equal Rights Association,
This movie gave a glimpse of the women of the 1917 Women’s Suffrage movement in their fight for women’s equality, which included their right to vote and the right run for office. The movie specifically addressed the many struggles that women who were involved in the movement endured during this time, as they had to sacrifice their marriages, endure rejection, withstand abuse and throughout all, attempt to stay hopeful.
Faweet took the prime minister, and peacefully, and patiently continued working to get the vote. She believed that the parliamentary democracy would eventually acknowledge women's right to the vote. So she dedicated to expand membership of NUWSS, to promote publically the demand for the vote, through speaking tours, and distribution of their journal, The Common Cause, and to lobby Liberal Politician to vote in favor of women's suffrage. They repudiated the use of violent tactics. Pankhurst on the other hand completely discarded the advice of the prime minster. She believed that of the vote was to be gain, then action had to be taken. Pankusrt actively spoke to gain the vote whenever a Liberal politician spoke. She participated in local and national suffrage demonstrations, at personal risk. WSPU follows this tactics, they disrupted meeting, organized demonstrations such as open-air rallies. In spite of all this government still did not act, so the WSPU turned to more violent tactic. They broke windows, poured liquid down mail boxes, cut telegraph wire, and curve "Votes for Women" in golf courses. They often encounter arrest, to which they responded with hunger strikes.