The Pros And Cons Of Tyranny

720 Words2 Pages

How do they avoid the Tyranny? Particular these what colonies trying to do. In Year 1787 the first Constitutional convention was in Philadelphia when the groups of delegates from thirteen states met together to improve the country in better ways. James Madison’s worried about creating a tyranny because one person can hold all their power and they could do everything. The Federalism identifies as three branches divided between Legislative, Judicial, and Executives. In different ways the Constitution want to set up the Separations of Powers and Checks and Balances so the government wouldn’t tyrannize all of us. Now that Big state vs. Small states were beholding by the Federal Government. …show more content…

By splitting the three branches and they would have to work with their own powers, The first branch was Legislative powers (congress) one of the person who can impeach and remove the officials, passing the laws and justifying trials. The second branch was Executive powers (pres. and vice pres.) the person who can deny, veto the federal and recommend federal judges. The constitution principles The third branch (courts) was Judicial powers who ruled the laws and cancelled the unconstitutional. Separation of Powers will keep doing their jobs to help the states also to prevent …show more content…

Small states representative had to make sure that their delegates must be equal. First Representatives came to Constitutional Convention to defend the two different politics. Senators had to be in charge for every state, If each government gives powers to work and it gave them rights. The Small state wont be take advantage to the other Large state cause a small states won’t have any fair amount of representative as the other big states. These could avoid the tyranny in making equal for the big states and small states. Essentials between Big state considering too occupied on populations and Small states have to get the same amount of

Open Document