Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of joining the eu
Pros and cons of Great Britain leaving the European Union
Advantages and disadvantages of joining the eu
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantages and disadvantages of joining the eu
Was it the right decision to leave the best thing that ever happened to us? Were we right to throw ourselves to the baying lions? By leaving the EU, we have destroyed our futures. Now we face many threats, the potential attack from ISIS….INCREASED! The money we had…GONE! And our job options….REDUCED! All because of one mistake. This mistake, made by the majority, will affect everyone from those yet to draw their first breathe to those who have drawn their last. This mistake, is like a virus, silent yet deadly. We did NOT make the right decision leaving the European Union.
There are countless reasons why staying within the European Union, is extremely beneficial, especially when it comes to protecting our citizens from ruthless thugs
…show more content…
Trading is the most important thing in today’s society as it offers us many jobs. With the European Union being a single trade market and the largest international market in the world, there are no tariffs on both exports and imports between EU Countries. It is clear that we benefit from this colossally as Sky News said 3.“More than 50 per cent of our exports go to EU countries”. Since our departure we have lost over £125 billion which is over 15 years of EU contributions. So are we really better off outside the European Union? I think not, the money lost will take years upon years to gain back and in the meantime that leaves your country and yourself down at the bottom of the well and since there in no European Union at the top to toss you down a rope, you are languishing at the bottom. Even other countries agree that we would be better off inside our comfortable Union as recently France made a comment warning Britons that 4.“there would be consequences for Britain if it left the EU”. Which is very true as if we remained in the EU our trading would be a lot easier with, reduced paperwork, 5.“a single currency to trade with” and no trade barriers. Doesn’t life sound easy? But where does jobs come …show more content…
They relate to Immigration and border control as a reason to leave. Campaigners for leaving the EU claim that 8.“Leaving the EU would ensure that the very best and brightest minds could come to the UK”. So they might be able to do this but ensuring the whole of Britain that this will happen is complete nonsense. Its not like the government has broken a promise before, a promise like that is excruciatingly hard to fulfill. By saying what the pro-Brexit Campaigners claim they are in fact being racist towards our Immigrants, as the campaigners words assert that immigrants are not smart enough. There is nothing wrong with these immigrants and they are smart, they help improve our economic growth. These so called 9.“prominent issues” actually have resulted in our country gaining an 10.“increase in overall employment and hence GDP without any significant negative impacts on the employment prospects of the native-born”. So why should we just throw these potential heroes out and not let them in. Ethnic Minorities in our country are heroes in ways you will not believe, you may not realise it but they have had a major impact on your lives. The police force, Firemen, RNLI crew and even your doctor could be a immigrant. Where would you be without them???
The benefits of the European Union outweigh the costs. Ever since the end of World War II, countries in the EU have been helped economically, politically, and culturally.
Furthermore, Norway didn’t join because they do not want to give up their independence. Small countries such as Portugal, Greece, Italy joined so they could be more powerful and wants more money. Still, does do the advantages of being in the EU excel the sacrifices? Honestly, I would say yes; essentially for economic competition, peace and security, and cultural diversity.
In conclusion, the benefits of the UK’s membership in the EU outweigh the costs. The most significant benefit is the access they have to the single market as this has managed to benefit quite Access to single market is aiding this inward investment
As Ian Fletcher pointed out in Free Trade Doesn’t Work: What Should Replace it And Why, nations need a well-chosen balance between openness and closure toward the larger world economy (Fletc...
Can it be that the ongoing debate over the amount of immigrants and asylum-seekers allowed to inhabit Britain annually has been an easy attraction for public criticism and has consequently spurred racism? This kind of control and power over another human's future and identity has led to the government disregarding immigrants' statuses as equals, a fault that has rubbed off in to our immediate society. The most critical of our government's handling of the situation would be the British media. Any fault results in widespread newspaper coverage.
On the other hand, UK is playing a major role in the single market. Thus, by leaving this market, UK
...: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (4), pp. 603-24.
in The United Kingdom has increased at an alarming rate over the past few decades. There are some issues, which should not be ignored and should not be disregarded, for instance
These are very exciting times for our country, we are now part of the largest economic community the world has ever seen, opening the doors of opportunity for us, the Irish citizens, everywhere we look. Ireland's membership of the EU is seen by most to be of great benefit to the country as it will solidify the foundations of our economy as well as increase the awareness of Ireland as an investment opportunity for multi national companies; however, some will argue that the change would be detrimental to our nation in the long run.
International relations can be viewed under realism or liberalism. Since Brexit relates to international relations among European countries, it can be analyzed using either realism or liberalism. To clarify, Brexit is a short name for “British exit,” which was a reference to the public vote of Britain’s citizens to exit the European Union. In short, European Union is an international organization forming an environment for the European member states solve internal or external political or environmental issues, increase job availability, and create other economic opportunities.
There are several key components of the European history that have led to the creation of the individual nations within the EU and the larger supranational Institution we call the European Union. As Curtis and Linser (2004) “The European Union is the most important development in European history since World War Two” (Curtis & Linser, 2004, p.4). And I tend to agree that this story line is the most important since it was the starting’s to one of the largest supranational organizations that shaped modern Europe and continues to shape it today. To start the European Union could not have been created without the nations that are part of this supranational organization. Many of the nations that make up the EU have been either long-term super powers, France, United Kingdom or Germany, but also areas plagued with conflict. The conflict is however the more important of the two. The conflict between Germany and the rest of Europe in WW2 was the sparks that created...
Various studies have scrutinised the overall impact of Brexit including the implications for jobs prospect, the effects on the public finances , its influence on the UK and also the possible risk it imposes on global economy. In conjunction with that, a plethora of analyses have also been attempted to quantify the economic impact Brexit primarily have on the UK , its region and also the rest the world. UK’s departure from the European Union , informally known as Brexit , bears an unswerving capacity to cut across the broad prism of economic constructs in both regional and global levels despite the wider claims that mentioned it is a risky step toward regional destabilization as EU loses its second largest
The main arguments to leave are to control immigration, reject the excessive bureaucracy (and associated cost) of Brussels and to lower prices for goods and services in the United Kingdom. I will focus on the economic argument to leave: leaving the European Union will save money by lowering prices and abstaining from "membership fees."
Fletcher, I. (2011). Crumbling of Free Trade – And Why it’s a Good Thing. Retrieved from
It is clear that talks about Brexit will not end quickly, and most important question is, what will happen in future. Well it could be claimed that is three different endings how this situation could end. Firstly one of the scenario is that Brexit happened and the U.K. completely leaves EU. In that case firstly British currency, the pound sterling, will fall down even more, than in the start after referendum. Also it will have consequences not only in Britain but also in the hole world, for example , some other countries, will see how Britain left European Union, and they will also will spoke to leave EU. So British leaving EU will have wide ranging repercussions on the other countries who look into EU skeptically also it will help Euro-skeptic