The Pros And Cons Of Historical Globalization

603 Words2 Pages

This source is definitely incorrect. The First Nations people have definitely had more drawbacks due to Historical Globalization than an advantage. The First Nations people have faced theft, disease, assimilation, depopulation and have been treated like subhuman members, due to Historical Globalization. Despite the negatives over weighing the positives, there are some ways that the First Nations people gained from Historical Globalization, such as technological advances due to trade, which therefore, the quality of life was slightly increased.

The Indian act is probably what lead to a lot of the damage to the first nations people. The Indian act, which was first established in 1876, was another way for the Canadian government to try and assimilate the First Nations into European culture. The residential schools was apart of the Indian Act, but it’s much larger than that. It banned the First Nations people from taking part in their traditional ceremonies, only the people who moved off the reserve were aloud to vote in the …show more content…

When the European people started coming to the First Nations land, they mostly brought food, people, ideas and disease. As the European people were already used to the sicknesses, it did not bother them, yet the First Nations people were never exposed to these diseases. So many of them died. When the Europeans exposed the First Nations people to these illnesses, the First Nations population fell drastically. Everyone was dying, because their bodies were not used to it. Other than the disease, something else lead to the depopulation of the First Nations people. It was that, the First Nations people were being pushed onto unproductive lands, because the Europeans were taking as much land as possible. On these unproductive lands, their connections with the land was much more difficult, they were not able to farm for food, so a lot of them

Open Document