Women can pay up to 42 percent more than men on products and services needed daily (Maloney 3). The state of California conducted a study about “ the issue of gender-based pricing of services and estimated that women effectively paid an annual 'gender tax’ of approximately $1,351 for the same services as men” (Blasio and Menin 6). Studies show that women pay more than men for various products and services. This gender-based price difference is widely known as the pink tax. The pink tax costs women thousands of unnecessarily spent dollars. Women’s products and services are more costly than male products and services, which creates a gender bias in people’s minds that are aware of this situation. Women are charged more for self-care products …show more content…
Side by side comparisons show a noticeable price difference between products meant for women and products meant for men. The pink tax is applied to most items that are intended for female use. The pink tax is applicable to many items in various categories such as: “children’s clothing, toys and games, and personal care products” (Maloney 3).” The pink tax is a markup on products and services that are meant for women. According to a report by the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs (NYCDCA), women’s products were more than twice likely to be priced higher than men’s products. They also estimated that about 42 percent of the time women’s products had a higher price (Maloney 3). Drugstore products that are directed at women are more than likely to be priced more than the same products directed towards men. Another study done by the University of Central Florida (UCF), showed that women pay more per ounce for certain products (Maloney 4). The pink tax is the main reason that feminine products are more expensive than masculine …show more content…
Explanations for the pink tax include tariffs, product differentiation, price discrimination, and price fixing. Some products are subject to “higher tariffs and [some] materials of a specific color or scent deemed more feminine may cost more to manufacture (Maloney 5).” The color of an object can also affect the tariff enforced on it. For example, if an object is pink, it could be priced more than an object that is blue. Tariffs on imported goods may vary depending on whom the product is made for. Clothing imports for women are taxed at a higher rate than clothing imports for men. Women’s imported products have a 15.1 percent tax while men’s imported products have an 11.9 percent tax. Additionally, if the package is changed to make the object gender specific, then it could potentially increase the price of the product. Products are sometimes priced higher because there are people that are willing to pay more for a product than other. A retailer can also change the price of an object if they believe that they will earn more money by doing so (Maloney 5). While there are many possible explanations on why gender-based pricing is around, there is really no way to determine the cause of the increased pricing of women’s
In her article, “Tax on Men,” Ann Thorpe says that a premium should be added to every tax return for every man in Canada. Men should pay a lot more of a share for these services since they are the ones that use them most. The government should follow the example of car insurance companies and tax men at a higher rate. Ann Thorpe’s position is reasonable and should be supported. Three reason why a having a premium added to every tax return for men is a good idea include the idea that men are more reckless than women, men use more of the public services that cost money to maintain and if men know they will be taxed more unless the statistics show that they are no longer reckless, they will begin to change their behaviour.
Throughout history, women were challenged with inequality and discrimination within a patriarchal society such voting in presidential elections, owning property and having job opportunities. During the last century, there have been many achievements that guarantee women rights and equality. For example, the Nineteenth Amendment gave women the right to vote in 1920 and the Equal Employment Opportunities Law prohibited employers from discriminating against gender in 1988.1 In her essay, “Pink Think”, Lynn Peril argues about the pressure on women that follow the rules of femininity.2 She describes the word “Pink Think”, as ideas and attitudes of proper women behavior.2 Although there are still some aspects of “Pink Think” culture that is still recognized today, the shifts in cultural and political events in recent centuries have increased attention to women’s issues against social injustice. Nevertheless, Peril neglects the fact that women today are living in a totally different time than how she pictures it because of the newly evolved cultural attitudes of gender roles and identity, labor, and living the American Dream.
This doesn’t include her “heavy flow” when she needs to change them every four hours or less. There are more important items that are taxed than these products. Feminine hygiene products shouldn’t be taxed because women have no choice but to buy these products, the products tax is too high and many states are eliminating the tax already. Women have no choice but to buy feminine hygiene products every month. Jeanne Sahadi, author of, “Is the ‘Tampon Tax’ unfair to Women,” argues that feminine hygiene products are a luxury item.
In addition, women are paid less than men for the same type of work. According to Lean In, Sheryl Sandberg mentions that women were paid fifty-nine cents for every dollar men were paid in 1996, but women protested to raise the compensation to seventy-seven cents (6). This means that even though a woman and a man perform the same work such as an engineer does, both do the same assignments and have the same responsibilities in the technology place, men are paid twenty three cents more than women. Moreover, women suffer from “gender discount” which means women have to pay for being part of the workplace or society ...
Nearly half of the labor force and breadwinners are women. More women are working in career fields and positions traditionally held by men. When women are not paid fairly, not only do they suffer, but so do their families. According to current research, “Despite passage of the Equal Pay Act of 1963, which requires that men and women in the same work place be given equal pay for equal work, the "gender gap" in pay persists. Full-time women workers’ earnings are only about 77 percent of their male counterparts’ earnings. The pay gap is even greater for African-American and Latina women, with African-American women earning 64 cents and Latina women earning 56 cents for every dollar earned by a Caucasian
Under the Equal Pay Act of 1863, the gender wage gap supposedly no longer exists, but the facts are that “as of 2012 women in the U.S. earn 77 cents to a man's dollar” (ProQuest Staff). Men try to justify this unjust statistic by saying that “wage gap isn't necessarily the result of discrimination” (ProQuest Staff). Although, there is no logical reasoning behind it. When women are actually given the same jobs as men they may be paid the same but typically, they are not able to reach the higher positions in the company that men do. Even with their 77 cents to a man’s dollar, “women still tend to bear a larger responsibility for child care and other household matters within families” (Mazorelle). Women are not given the opportunity to earn as much as men and then they still have to take on a majority of the responsib...
Due to the various options of distribution channels their prices vary. Consumers take that into consideration when purchasing their products.
... black packaging that depicts a man ever so chivalrously allowing a women to enter the protection of his manbrella. These products, while seemingly innocent, are constant reinforces of gender stereotypes. A choice between the Dude Wipes brand and the Playtex Wipe is not just about splitting consumers into male and female buyers. This process bears implications of what it means to fall under the category of the male box and the female box. These products reinforce the gender related characteristics that our society has labeled as masculine and feminine. Men are not to show compassion or empathy, and women are not to be tough, or in charge. Beyond the inappropriate societal reinforcement of gender norms, the products targeted at women are often more expensive then similar products aimed at a male consumer. In a world of blue and pink packaging, women loose every time.
Taxation and tariffs: governments may apply different clothes taxations, making it more difficult to sell in certain location. This in turn will influence the price as a consequence, mining demand in some countries.
Where commercials that are selling a product to women focus on beauty or the ease of use using wording like sleek clean lines, soft, makes life easier. This is because men are portrayed as being masculine and being responsible for outdoor chores like lawn maintenance where as women are portrayed as delicate and weak and tend to be in charge of daily in home chores like cooking, and cleaning. While analyzing the genders used in the commercials and what the roles were we found that the women tended to do the shopping and asking the questions about products and the men seemed to be bored and were there to pay the bill and be the one responsible for the assembly of the product purchased. The colors of the products being sold play important role as well. Men seem to be more attracted to darker or bolder colors like black, red, green, and blue where products for women are usually lighter or softer colors like white, or pastels.
The United States has one of the highest gender pay gaps among the developed countries. In the country, the gender pay gap is measured as the ratio of female to males yearly earning among workers in full-time, year round (FTYR) earnings. In 2009, female FTYR earned 77% (0.77) as much as the FTYR male workers (US Census Bureau, 2013). The history of Gender Gap earning reveals USA has made big strides towards reducing the gender pay gap from 1980. For instance, in 1980 the gender pay gap ratio was 0.62 while in 1990, the gap stood at 0.72. Further from 1990 to 2000, the gap reduced to 0.73 and then to 0.77 in 2009. Currently, the gender pay gap stands at 0.76 and continues to persist (US Census Bureau, 2013).
I’m not 100% sure this is deliberate, but you can definitely tell that gender is an important factor in how they run their businesses. Every single age was affected by gender, from babies to elderly people. From my understanding, this would be on the institutional level of the gender structure. As stated in the excerpt, “…institutional domains where explicit regulations regarding resource distribution and material goods are gender specific” (Risman, pg. 433). These material goods are being marketed in different ways and for different prices to each gender. Gender is a large part of our society and culture. It dictates how items are marketed towards both genders, and places us into gender roles whether we like it or
Another large sexist factor in the workforce, is that women get paid less than men do for the same exact job. “Women get paid 77 cents on the dollar for every dollar a man makes, according to a recent study from the Institute for Women's Policy Research. That's a difference of more than $10,000 per year on average,”(Berman). Why is this? Some people believe that it is because women gravitate towards low...
Closing the wage gap between men and women is a continuing struggle today in nations all over the world. In many occupations, women are paid less overall than their male counterparts. One nation, however, is making strides to bring this disparity in wages into the light. British law will soon require large companies to publish information about the salaries paid to their male and female employees. While this is a great step forward in recognizing the gender pay gap, many women also face many other obstacles to getting equal pay, such as the “Mommy Tax” that reporter Ann Crittenden talks about in her piece of the same name (Kirk and Okazawa-Rey 337).
... tax tariff. Based on the assumption that the company is exporting the finished goods to major developed countries such as the U.S. and the E.U. the transportation costs is high.