The Mytilene Debate and Athenian Debate

1590 Words4 Pages

The book written by Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, contains two controversial debates between distinguished speakers of Athens. The two corresponding sides produce convincing arguments which can be taken as if produced as an honest opinion or out of self-interest. The two debates must be analyzed separately in order to conclude which one and which side was speaking out of honest opinion or self-interest, as well as which speakers are similar to each other in their approach to the situation. In the Mytilene Debate the two speakers are Creon, presenting the side in favor of killing the people, and Diodotus, on the opposing side. The two speakers present their opinions on the best way to deal with the Mytilenean people as a consequence after their revolt, as well as actions that should overall be taken in the future if history were to repeat itself. The two sides differ in that Creon wants justice for the revolt by completely terminating the Mytilenean men, whereas Diodotus considers the fact that the revolt might have been an Aact of calculated aggression@ and is willing to spare the lives of the Mytileneans. Creon accuses Athens as being weak if they forgive them, he stresses that if the Mytileans are not killed other cities will not fear the possibility of revolting against Athens: Afor it is a general rule of human nature that people despise those who treat them well and look up to those who make no concessions. Let them therefore have the punishment which their crime deserves.@ (p. 215, 38) He also argues that the same punishment should be enlisted on all the cities that betray Athens so that a consistency is apparent so that no city will think that they may escape the wrath of Athens that follows such a cr... ... middle of paper ... ...t their best interest is in the well-fair of Athens. Both these debates have a background question at hand, whether or not the speakers were presenting their opinions out of honest opinion for the well-being of Athens or self-interest. Out of the four speakers two (Nicias and Diodotus) honestly cared for the future of Athens and did not act on the slightest bit for their self-interest. Cleon also cared about the well-being of Athens but merely gave out the immoral and haste answer to a problem that obviously needed more thought to it. Alcibiades stands alone on this one, being the only one to have acted out of self-interest who only spoke to protect his name and gain a few points of honor here and there. Within the same book Thucydides presents two debates that ask the same question of the speakers where the answer apparently depends on the debate and the text.

Show More
Related

  • Opposing Viewpoints: Demosthenes and Isocrates Address Philip of Macedonia

    893 Words  | 2 Pages

    Demosthenes and Isocrates came to prominence in fourth century B.C.E. Athens as public speakers and as politicians. Isocrates was a teacher of rhetoric, or the art of public speaking, while Demosthenes was a professional litigator, writing speeches for clients arguing in the courts of law, and occasionally presenting arguments himself. Both men were highly respected citizens and opinion makers throughout the sphere of influence maintained by Athens, though they held opposing views regarding the proper course for Athenian government, warfare between the Greek city-states, and the prospect of invasion from the Persian Empire to the east. While the Greek city-states engaged in fratricidal warfare, Philip of Macedon began consolidation of his political power by essentially offering up his highly trained professional Macedonian army as mercenary soldiers to the various city-states requesting assistance or protection and demanding control as hegemon or monarch of the city-state in return for military aid. Following a declaration of truce, Philip would impose his rule upon the vanquished as well.

    Read More

  • Antigone

    1762 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...y exist within the two viewpoints, making a conclusion that much more difficult. Throughout the play, each character rattles off the reasons for their actions. Both also justify their actions religiously, believing they are the ones acting accordingly by the gods. The entire plot is a construction of conflict between personal and social motives, a scene not uncommon in today’s society. Sophocles attempts to answer the debate by ultimately showing that the gods approved of Antigone’s motives and that Creon should have buried his nephew. But with so much unnecessary bloodshed committed at the end of the story, it is impossible to believe that this is the final decision. Sophocles believed that the individual held the power and the state shouldn’t have total control over an individual. This is hardly a solution to the debate, the fact that everyone dies. Rather, it is a sign that the debate will live on for all of eternity.

    Read More

  • Just and Unjust Speech in Aristophanes' "Clouds"

    591 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout Aristophanes’ “Clouds” there is a constant battle between old and new. It makes itself apparent in the Just and Unjust speech as well as between father and son. Ultimately, Pheidippides, whom would be considered ‘new’, triumphs over the old Strepsiades, his father. This is analogous to the Just and Unjust speech. In this debate, Just speech represents the old traditions and mores of Greece while the contrasting Unjust speech is considered to be newfangled and cynical towards the old. While the defeat of Just speech by Unjust speech does not render Pheidippides the ability to overcome Strepsiades, it is a parallel that may be compared with many other instances in Mythology and real life.

    Read More

  • Thucydides: Fear, Honor, And Interest

    273 Words  | 1 Pages

    Thucydides was right to claim that all wars can be explained by Fear, Honor, and Interest. All Wars are related to the three characteristics as stated by Dr. Nation (Dr. Nation video). The Athenians thought process was that the weak would be ruled by the strong and that was the nature of conflict (Strassler p. 43). Looking at the Peloponnesian war itself will illustrate how fear, honor and interest were involved with how this war developed. The initial unnamed Athenian that made that statement was probably using it to deter war with Sparta when it mostly incited the war (Dr. Nation Video). The Athenians wanted to maintain and sustain their city state but also expand it. They were expanding through their alliances and this is what invoked the

    Read More

  • An Analysis of Thucydides' Views on the Melian Dialogue

    1591 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this paper, I will first extract Thucydides views from the Melian Dialogue and then analyze whether or not these views are well founded. Thucydides believed that the Athenians had the stronger argument. Proof of this lies in the way Thucydides picked the arguments for each side. For the moment, we will disregard the actual content of the arguments, and look at argumentation forms and the flow of the debate. The Melians argued using consequences of an Athenian take over.

    Read More

  • Obituary Ancient Greece

    536 Words  | 2 Pages

    Of all the history of the Ancient Greece, there were two events that showed really well how disunity among the Greeks highly contributed to its downfall, which were the Peloponnesian War and Successors’ War. Interestingly, both wars occurred after a unity and followed by a unity that was carried out by “outsiders”. This may have actually shown that the Greeks had never learned from their past

    Read More

  • Justice and Social Order in Antigone

    1278 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... by vultures because she had a strong belief in family honor and the will of the gods, one which as long as no harm is done should be upheld above other laws. There are two competing forms of justice throughout “Antigone” which inform the argument of whether or not Antigone should have followed Creon’s laws through the tension of the city state and the will of the people as well as the gods. Creon’s argument was flawed in his disregard for public opinion and that he overlooked Antigone’s valid argument because of her gender and his pride. Antigone argues that a mortal man cannot override the will of the gods, a valid argument of the times. It is and was crucially important to fully consider the best interest of the citizens that is being voiced at the time of decision making, if it is not taken into consideration the city, as seen in Thebes will fall into shambles.

    Read More

  • James Dashner's Maze Runner

    926 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. "Peloponnesian War (ancient Greek History)."Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, 24 Dec. 2013. Web. 05 Apr. 2014

    Read More

  • The Causes and Effects of the Peloponnesian War

    1350 Words  | 3 Pages

    The causes of the Peloponnesian War proved to be too great between the tension-filled stubborn Greek city-states of Athens and Sparta. As Thucydides says in Karl Walling’s article, “Never had so many human beings been exiled, or so much human blood been shed” (4). The three phases of the war, which again, are the Archidamian war, the Sicilian Expedition and the Decelean war, show the events that followed the causes of the war, while also showing the forthcoming detrimental effects that eventually consumed both Athens and eventually Sparta effectively reshaping Greece.

    Read More

  • The Source of Conflict between Antigone and Creon in Sophocles' Antigone

    1274 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the following paper, I plan to discuss the source of conflict between the title characters of Antigone and Creon in Sophocles’ “Antigone”. I also plan to discuss how each character justifies his or her actions and what arguments they give for their justifications. I will also write about the strengths and weaknesses of these arguments. The final points I try to make are about who Sophocles thinks is right and who I think is right.

    Read More

  • Antigone And Creon

    468 Words  | 1 Pages

    good." I think that the fundamental issue that comes out of the work is the basic definition of what it means to place value on beliefs in a heterogeneous social order. It would be easier if the battle was between "good vs. bad," but where Hegel, and Sophocles, found tension and true tragedy was in the action of having to choose between two equally desirable, but ultimately incompatible courses of action. Prior to Creon's own renouncement of his stubbornness, there is an agonizing choice to be made. On one hand, there is Creon with the word of the law as representing justice. On the other hand, Antigone presents her conception of justice as transcending the law. Both carry significant implications that have to cause some level of pause within the reader/ audience. If we validate Creon as being right, then it speaks to the absolute certainty of the political and social order, an order of individuals as carrying transcendent quality to it. If we validate Antigone, then it speaks to the idea that anyone is able to raise question to this system, and bring doubt into a realm where certainty is needed. At the same time, if we validate both characters, we also sanction the pain caused to those who have the unfortunate distinction of being in love with them. These characters become collateral damage in the tragic drama between two competing notions of the good. It is here where tragedy is evident. For this reason, I would have to see Hegel's view as one consistent with Classical tragedy, forcing agony and pain out of choice, and being the direct purpose of Sophocles in the construction of the

    Read More

  • Sophocles´ Antigone and Euripides´ The Bacchae

    1058 Words  | 3 Pages

    In addition, Creon disregards what had historically been the best counsel for the city, the blind prophet Tiresias. Despite Tiresias’ warnings that his “high resolve that sets this plague on Thebes,” will “strike [him] down with the pains [he] perfected,” Creon’s stubborn commitment to the laws of state turns to be his error. Eventually convinced by Tiresias’ warnings, Creon resolves to release Antigone from her isolated tomb. Regrettably, he’s too late and the consequences of his insolence for the divine laws were far worse than if he had “[L]ay[ed] [my] pride bare to the blows of ruin” (1220). Creon’s undoing can be viewed as an allegory of the calamities that ensue when the laws of man pursue to challenge the ancient laws of gods.

    Read More

  • Significance of Pericles' Death

    1280 Words  | 3 Pages

    As can be expected from pioneer governmental institutions, Athenian democracy was not perfect. In fact it was far from it. It resulted in the establishment of poor policies by aggressive populists who sought "...private ambition and private profit...which were bad both for the Athenians themselves and their allies." (Thucydides). These self interested populist leaders with personal gain in mind established extensive internal political instability "...by quarrelling among themselves [and] began to bring confusion into the policy of the state." (Thucydides). Repeated opportunities to accept terms of peace after the battles of Pylos (425), Arginusae (406) and Aegospotami (405) were ignored by the inefficient Athenian demos eventually resulting in the devastation of the once dominant city-state. Internal political strife can also be attribu...

    Read More

  • Melian Dialogue as interpreted through perspectives of Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism

    1175 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Melian Dialogue bears a host of political interpretations as the Melians and Athenians negotiate the reality of power and rights of countries on the scale of empires. Though Cleomedes eventually relied on the heavy handed realist course of action in the Peloponnesian War, ideally, he could have cultivated a healthy respect for differing universal truths of political theories and the fluidity of interpretation in every text available to us today.

    Read More

  • Ismene's Indecisiveness in Sophocles' Antigone Antigone essays

    1521 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to Thucydides, Athenians value decisiveness and swift action, preferring to act toward a goal rather than waiting for something to happen.  An example of these values can be found in the Corinthian speech to the Spartan assembly in Book I Chapter 70.  The characteristics of the Spartans are in sharp contrast to the Athenian ideals.  The Spartans are described by the Corinthians as too inactive and passive, always waiting for something to happen instead of acting beforehand.  While Creon and Antigone are distinctly separated in their beliefs, in how they handle their beliefs they are very similar.  This clearly defines Antigone and Creon in the play as characters acting more in the way thought to be Athenian, and Ismene in a manner much more typical of the Spartans.  The characters' different approaches to the situation encapsulate the conflict of ideals that is about to take place with the Peloponnesian war.

    Read More

More about The Mytilene Debate and Athenian Debate

Open Document