An Analysis of Thucydides' Views on the Melian Dialogue

1591 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis of Thucydides’ melian dialogue

An Analysis of Thucydides' Views on the Melian Dialogue

The Melian Dialogue is a debate between Melian and Athenian representatives concerning the sovereignty of Melos. The debate did not really occur-the arguments given by each side were of Thucydides own creation. Thus it is reasonable to assume that we can tease out Thucydides' own beliefs. In this paper, I will first extract Thucydides views from the Melian Dialogue and then analyze whether or not these views are well founded.

Thucydides believed that the Athenians had the stronger argument. Proof of this lies in the way Thucydides picked the arguments for each side. For the moment, we will disregard the actual content of the arguments, and look at argumentation forms and the flow of the debate.

The Melians argued using consequences of an Athenian take over. In section 110, the Melians threatened that if their allies the Lacedaemonians were provoked by the takeover of Melos, they might attack Athens itself: "...the Cretan sea is a large place; and the masters of the sea will have more difficulty in overtaking vessels which want to escape than the pursued in escaping. If the attempt should fail they may invade Attica itself, and find their way to allies of yours whom Brasidas did not reach: and then you will have to fight, not for the conquest of a land in which you have no concern, but nearer home, for the preservation of your confederacy and of your own territory." In addition, the Melians complained that they would be thought of as cowards if they surrendered, and they warned the Athenians that hostility would turn other neutral city-states against them.

The Melians offered mere speculation. Their arguments sound like the work of a weak and desperate g...

... middle of paper ...

...ust have had more of the things that the gods cared about. The Melians would have been hard pressed to argue that they had more favor amongst the gods than the Athenians, because anything of virtue that they could claim to have had, the Athenians could claimed to have had but more or better. The Melian argument then that they were favored by the gods and therefore must remain free is inconsistent. If Athens and Melos went to battle against each other, the gods, if they favored anyone, would favor Athens.

We have now examined Thucydides' strongest arguments for Athenian rule. It is clear that Athens had a stronger claim to rule than the Melians had to remain sovereign. We also know that Athens' claims hold up when we examine them for validity. Thucydides beliefs in Athens' claims were therefore well founded.

Works Cited:

The Melian Dialogue, Thucydides

Show More
Related

  • The Old Oligarch: Revealing Athens as a World Class City

    1008 Words  | 3 Pages

    The effects of this go far beyond the imbalance of military power between Athens and her tributaries, however. The Old Oligarch lists four main areas where the existence of the Empire benefits the common people of Athens, thus giving impetus to radicalize democracy and justify the expansion and strengthening of the Empire, and giving is reason to find an ongoing justification for its existence. The first is the building of the disproportionately large Athenian navy. Second is the overall flattening of the Athenian social pyramid, raising the relative status of the lowest classes of society, and exemplified by the way that Athens becomes a magnet for aliens to live and work, and gives unusual freedom and opportunity to slaves. Third is that the allies are compelled to have their court cases tried in Athenian courts, bringing both prestige and financial reward to Athens. Finally, the centralizing effect of these things, and the obvious maritime nature of the Empire, make Athens a trading center, m...

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Milean Dialogue And Pericles Funeral Oration

    586 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Melian Dialogue, it describes the negotiation between the people of Athens and the people of Melos. The people of Melos wants their independence and the Athenians who wanted to invade and expand their territory. “Because you would have the advantage of submitting before suffering the worst, and we should gain by not destroying you”. The Athenians were giving the Melian leadership an ultimatum. They could surrender or the Athenians would take over. “While the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must”. The Athenians are demonstrating dictatorial actions on the Melians. There is also evidence in that again in the Athenian dialogue. “Of the gods we believe, and of men we know, that by a necessary law of their nature they rule wherever they can. All we do is to make use of it, knowing that you and everybody else, having the same power as we have would do the same as we do”. The Athenians believe that it is their right to take over the Melians and any country they would like to control because they

    Read More

  • Athens vs. Sparta: Was War Between the Two Inevitable?

    2610 Words  | 6 Pages

    The problem occurs when each of the city-states’ own ego gets in the way of the cause. They handily defeated the Persians, but the Athenians took the credit for it, and paid homage to themselves, through elaborate celebrations of victory. In their minds, they were at the head of Hellas. The Spartans took exception to this, and rightfully so. The credit has to go to them as well, for the large part that they played in the victory over Persia.

    Read More

  • Thucydides: Fear, Honor, And Interest

    273 Words  | 1 Pages

    Thucydides was right to claim that all wars can be explained by Fear, Honor, and Interest. All Wars are related to the three characteristics as stated by Dr. Nation (Dr. Nation video). The Athenians thought process was that the weak would be ruled by the strong and that was the nature of conflict (Strassler p. 43). Looking at the Peloponnesian war itself will illustrate how fear, honor and interest were involved with how this war developed. The initial unnamed Athenian that made that statement was probably using it to deter war with Sparta when it mostly incited the war (Dr. Nation Video). The Athenians wanted to maintain and sustain their city state but also expand it. They were expanding through their alliances and this is what invoked the

    Read More

  • Thucydides Rhetorical Analysis

    680 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thucydides expresses how a combination of fear and greed escalates in the rhetoric of two opposing camps to divide a nation through his focus on personalities. As an example, Thucydides provides the case of the Athenians' ally Corcyra, when civil war broke out during the Peloponnesian War. This precedent acts as a model of foreshadowing for the Athenians between Nicias and Alcibiades, as they attempt to sway the crowd using negative and positive examples about whether they should go to war with Sicily.

    Read More

  • Justice, Convention And Political Virtue In Aristophanes Clouds Analysis

    1691 Words  | 4 Pages

    Let us firstly analyze and delineate the significant instances in the interchange between the unjust speech and the unjust speech. Both the unjust and just speech begin this interchange with a heavy slandering of one another. Perhaps, one of the most notable moments of this slander is when the just speech, after claiming that it believes in and stands for justice and is hence “speaking the just things”, is asked by the unjust speech that “denies that justice even exists” to “answer the following question, if justice truly exists, then why didn’t Zeus perish when he bound his father?” (p. 152, 901-905). The just speech replies to this question by exclaiming that “...this is the evil that’s spreading around” and that he needs “a basin” if he is to continue hearing it (p. 152, 906-907). Firstly the just speech, as a mouthpiece for the existing Athenian legal-political convention, has claimed that this legal-political convention is where justice in its entirety is to be found. Secondly and simultaneously, however, the just speech finds itself unable to articulate what it means by justice and how the teachings of the Homeric Gods, that have informed the construction of Athenian political convention, are positive and/or negative examples of an

    Read More

  • Thucydides Mytilenean Debate

    792 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thucydides’ Mytilenean Debate is an attempt to represent a fifth-century rhetoric in action. Such rhetoric is heavily influenced by an Athenian speech tradition of sophism or persuasive speech. Thucydides chooses Cleon and Deodotus to represent the opposite sides of the debate. Cleon, who argues for putting Mytileneans to death, is described as the most violent man in Athens. Deodotus argues against putting Mityleneans to death and uses rhetoric to persuade Athenians for a more rational and responsible decision.

    Read More

  • Thucydides Strengths And Weaknesses

    1102 Words  | 3 Pages

    The speeches are never 100 per cent word for word and therefore allow room for inaccuracies in the history. And although Thucydides wrote them as best he could while still adhering to what actually happened there was always something that could have been left out or forgotten. That being said, this one weakness doesn’t discredit Thucydides credibility as his manuscripts still stuck with original proposals and opinions of the speakers he documented and therefore his work is still a more historically accurate reflection of what actually occurred in comparison to other historians

    Read More

  • Classical Athens: Political Success In Democratic Athenian Democracy

    1399 Words  | 3 Pages

    The political atmosphere of Classical Athens was one to behold on a global scale. A style government that had not been so much as thought of anywhere else in the world was flourishing in the powerful polis, and proved to be the backbone of its success in the ancient world. Democracy did away with the tyrants, monarchs, and oligarchs of the past and instead offered a voice to every man in the state who so chose to participate. Many cities of the ancient world would shudder at the thought of offering a voice to commoners, and even the poverty stricken; but the Athenian mindset was prideful in the notion that any citizen of the great city was competent enough to take part in civil discourse and furthermore

    Read More

  • Argument Against Thucydides Melian Dialogue

    1158 Words  | 3 Pages

    Therefore, Melos is highly vulnerable to being seized by Athens. The high-power held by Athenians and Melos being a small colony, do not succour the Melians. However, in this case, the size of Melos does not impact or define the Melians’ strength. The Melians’ confidence and rectitude are what delineates their strength against the Athenians who were looked upon as unassailable. The Melians portray their strength against all odds by maintaining an ethos that favours what is righteous. Despite the Athenians representation of themselves as being more dominant, the Melians’ virtuous ideologies give them the capacity of defying the Athenians, consequently subjugating the Athenians’ ability to

    Read More

  • Athenian Synthesis Essay

    457 Words  | 1 Pages

    For example, in the Persian Wars, Pericles stood up among all citizens and led them into battle. Citizens gave him power and allowed him to gain control. Furthermore, when Athens conquered any territory, the owners of that land would become subject to Athenian Citizens, further showing that some citizens boasted more power than others. In the Melian Dialogue it states, "At the moment we shall prove that we have come in the interest of our empire and that in what we shall say we are seeking that safety of your state; for we wish you to become our subjects with the least trouble to ourselves" (27). In this quote, the Athenian army is trying to convince the Melians to surrender and become subjects within their empire. However, if all people are considered equal, then the Athenians are going against their beliefs. Furthermore, there were multiple restrictions on becoming a citizen. A citizen must be a free male eighteen years or older, owner of land, and his parents must be citizens as well. This showed that citizens were considered above all other settlers in Athens. Although the Athenians claimed to contain a Democratic society where all people are equal, throughout their empire, people gradually gained power as more regions were

    Read More

  • Why Thucydides Means

    436 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the book, “History of the Peloponnesian War”, Thucydides cleverly applies the newly coined Greek word, δεμαγωγός. In this essay, I will attempt to give a literal account of how the word was constructed, what this newly coined term means, and how the Athenians could have reacted to such a term.

    Read More

  • Thucydides Flaws

    1472 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thucydides believes that democracy is a naturally flawed form of government. By looking through the lens of human nature, the flaws are not seen to be attributed to democracy in itself. By the use of speeches that were given, by his “account” in the era of the Peloponnesian war, the thriving and failing ways of democracy can be seen. Support for this position is provided in the work that Thucydides presents to us is the form of speeches. These speeches were often given in the form of debate, and included the Mytilenean debate, the debate before the Sicilian Expedition, but also the Pericles’ Funereal Oration. Within the perspective that Thucydides gave, it is revealed that human nature is a cause for democratic government to be undermined.

    Read More

  • The Republic of Plato: The Debate

    1393 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thrasymachus begins this debate by claiming, “the just is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger” (15). He provides further explanation, while introducing the different ruling groups of cities, where each “sets down laws for its own advantage,” which is he claims is “just for the ruled”. These claims are clearly presented in spite, following Thrasymachus’ gross criticizing of Socrates’ method of argument, while referring to him “disgusting” (16). Socrates grants “that the just is something of advantage,” he questions whether it is necessarily the

    Read More

  • Analysis of Thrasymachus' Argument in The Republic

    651 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thrasymachus starts off by stating his conclusion: justice is the advantage of the stronger. He then gives Socrates two premises that he uses to arrive at his conclusion first that rulers of cities are stronger than their subjects and second that rulers declare what is just and unjust by making laws for their subjects to follow. Since justice is declared by the stronger then it must surely be a tool for the stronger.

    Read More

More about An Analysis of Thucydides' Views on the Melian Dialogue

Open Document