More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on Shakespeare's historical plays
William Shakespeare in the present
William Shakespeare in the present
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Importance of the Fight Scene in William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet
1Introduction
The fight scene in "Romeo and Juliet" is a very important set piece.
This scene is very much used be "William Shakespeare" as a way to
connect to the reader viewing it. He tries to allow the reader to have
mixed emotions. Some of the emotions the fight set piece is trying to
display are Hate, Horror, Excitement, fear and tension. The reason why
the reader feels these emotions are because there are many points in
the fight scenes where the main character could have and almost does
get killed.
The context of this set piece is very much heading towards the
dramatic time in which "William Shakespeare" wrote "Romeo and Juliet"
(1595). This is because the why that all the characters would carry
swords around with them and it was seen as the norm. There are many
things that make us accept this. One is the way that Mercutio calls
his sword a "Fiddlestick".
The main reasons which make us anticipate the fight between Tybalt and
Romeo; one thing is that Mercutio shouts before he dies:
A plague on both your houses.
Three times and this really changes the mood of the scene. Also Tybalt
returns and taunts Romeo about Mercutio's death.
2"William Shakespeare" sets this scene at the beginning to really
make the reader sense that there is going to be s fight of some sort
between the Montague and Capulet. He does this by having the
characters saying things like:
And if we meet, we shall not 'scape a brawl
For now, these hot days, is the mad blood stirring
This concludes to us that Benvolio is anticipating a fight. But
Mercutio se...
... middle of paper ...
...ene is very good at
illustrating the Conflict between the two families, in how when the
arguing is going on the stand on their own side never, near the
others.
The main themes that can be used to describe are Terror, Tragedy and
action with excitement. Mainly because of all the fighting and killing
which all adds you to what the scene represents.
After the moment when Romeo kills Tybalt the reader braces themselves
for what is going to happen after. At the time the reader is most
likely to believe that Romeo will be executed because of the fighting.
Because earlier on in the story the prince says
If you ever disturb our streets again,
Your lives shall pay the forfeit of the peace,
But never the less the prince decides not to punish Romeo by death but
banish him so the reader does feel relived at this.
Foreshadowing is a beneficial literary device that may be most salutary once the reader has completed the passage. In the short story,“The Most Dangerous Game”, author Richard Connell uses foreshadowing to expose General Zaroff as a bloodthirsty cannibal to his readers.
Although doctor-patient confidentiality is standard today, a caveat about this privilege is that it does not protect all statements made to therapists and only applies to regularly scheduled appointments. Additionally, if a patient reveals that they intend to harm someone, it is the therapist’s duty to report this fact to the proper authorities.
Sometimes when people are amongst conflict, they act impetuously in certain situations. In the play Romeo and Juliet written by William Shakespeare, careless actions take place by the characters when they are put into stressful and difficult situations. They are not thought through and result in consequences for more than just themselves. In Romeo and Juliet when in the midst of conflict, characters tend to think and act impulsively and not think of the reaction to their actions. They do not think of the consequences their actions may bring, or how they may affect others in the future.
William Shakespeare's Use of Conflict in Act 1 Scene 5 of Romeo and Juliet. I believe conflict has a number of different meanings, like a fight or perhaps a feud, or maybe even just an everyday argument. But also it could be referred to as a clash, not as a physical clash but a clash. of two different things completely opposite coming together.
Corbin, J.R. (2007). Confidentiality and the duty to warn: Ethical and legal implications for the therapeutic relationship. The New Social Worker, 4-7.
He wants her and at the same time wants her to go away, "to caress her and destroy her". The black boys who were to take part in the battle were humiliated, some passed out, others pleaded to go home. But the white men paid no attention. The white men end up attacking the girl, who is described as having the same terror and fear in her eyes as the black boys. Once the girl escapes, the black boys get in the boxing ring and are blindfolded for the battle royal.
The reader is put in the middle of a war of nerves and will between two men, one of which we have grown up to learn to hate. This only makes us even more emotional about the topic at hand. For a history book, it was surprisingly understandable and hard to put down. It enlightened me to the complex problems that existed in the most memorable three months this century.
Without exception, confidentiality trumps duty to warn, court rules (2004). Mental Health Law Report, 22 (6), 53. Retrieved from http://find.galegroup.com/gtx/infomark.do?&contentSet=IAC-Documents&type=retrieve&tabID=T003&prodId=GRCM&docId=A120474886&source=gale&userGroupName=clemson_itweb&version=1.0
...g with veracity include not only the basic expectation that we are honest in our professional interactions, but also in the area of informed consent. Counselors must be honest with clients concerning all areas of treatment, including the responsibilities for reporting certain information to parents or the authorities. The client must be made aware that counselors are accountable to the client, but legally as well.
As stated by Collins (2007), the privacy and openness to discuss intimate issues can stimulate vulnerability with the client. Another ethical issue with this theory can be a growing dependence with the counselor. An additional ethical issue with this therapy is for the client to know his or her vulnerability regarding emotional or sexual needs when it comes to counseling a client (Corey, 2007). An additional ethical issue for the Individual Psychology therapy is that there may be some confusion as times to what is to happen in the counseling
In today’s society with the blogs, the gossip sites and the other forms of social media, confidentiality is a thing of the past. However, for, physicians and other health professionals, they are held to a higher standard to maintain a level of ethics and confidentiality for their patients. Confidentiality is a major duty for a health professional, but is there ever a time to where it is okay to tell what a patient says in confident? What if the patient is a minor, or a senior citizen or someone who is mentally challenged? What if a patient is being abused or wants to commit suicide? Does it matter if it is a nurse, or a dentist, or a psychologist or is all medical professional held to the same moral standard? What roles does a consent form or Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act plays in the medical world in being confidentiality? I would like to explore Confidentiality and the moral effects it has on the health profession.
...confidential information is shared without their permission, this situation can be detrimental to the client. The client may stop treatment or be passive-aggressive towards the therapist by being late of cancelling appointments with the clinician.
However, there are some cases that professionals have to rely on the Law. The Law is different from moral principles and Code of Ethics and its focus is on the legal perspective to protect the professional. The Law is defined by Remley and Herlihy (2010) as “general or specific regarding both what is required and what is allowed of individuals who from a governmental entity” (p.4). One major example is the Tarasoff and the Duty to Protect which is a law that was created after the case that happened with a university student, Tatiana Tarasoff and her boyfriend. Tarasoff’s parents sue the psychotherapists alleging that the professionals should have warned the student. Because of this case, the law raised a major concern that the confidentiality that professionals should follow according to the ACA and AMHCA Code of Ethics has to be broken when there is an issue that can affect a third party in the situation. Like the AMHCA refers to confidentiality as “a right granted to all clients of mental health counseling services. From the onset of the counseling relationship, mental health counselors inform clients of these rights inclu...
However, the therapist is also a private citizen. Reporting a concern as a private citizen is also her right. Utilizing the Homeland Security program of "If You See Something, Say Something™", she would be well within her rights to inform authorities of a concern with domestic terrorism (DHS, 2017). She does not need to disclose the client’s name, therefore protecting his confidentially. It is likely that this department is aware of the event and this may possibly trigger heighten security to protect everyone
In reading this study, the main aspect I realize was none of the clients had any sever problem. This might have been one of the reason why the study came out so positive. If a therapist disclose personal information to a client without a sever problem, I feel there could be a good chance of a positive outcome.