No one likes being told what they are doing wrong. Some people know how to accept criticism in a positive way and begin to make changes. Some people don’t know how to accept criticism; they always get offended when you tell them they are doing something wrong. All criticism is a way for people to help you or give advice on something you may not be doing right. People want to see you doing the right thing and learning more.
People need to learn to deal with criticism better than getting emotional and feeling like the person doesn’t like them. Criticism should be motivation that you’re getting better because someone wants to help you improve. Everywhere you go if someone wants to give you advice you should be able to take it without your
…show more content…
It shows that you are listening and are interested in learning how to learn the right way to do things. A simple Yes or No means that you’re listening but not interested in learning how to become better at your work. Ask questions about how you can handle the situation better next time. Making sure you can improve and better your work from how it was before the feedback was received.
If someone gives you criticism it is very important not to become rude or disrespectful. The critiques are only trying to help better your performance. Responding to criticism with grace and appreciation will help you become a better person and help create more positive relationships in your life. Be mindful and try avoiding harsh reactions. This will help you gain clarity and freedom to choose how you want to respond.
Taking deep breathes when you are feeling depressed or feeling your emotions getting the best of you helps calm your nerves. When you take deep breathes it stimulates the parasympathetic nervous system in your body. It is the quickest and easiest way to calm you down. Exercising helps calm your nerves also when you are feeling stressed. Aerobic exercise like jogging will provide mental benefits in areas from stress, anxiety, and self-
Americans have embraced debate since before we were a country. The idea that we would provide reasoned support for any position that we took is what made us different from the English king. Our love of debate came from the old country, and embedded itself in our culture as a defining value. Thus, it should not come as a surprise that the affinity for debate is still strong, and finds itself as a regular feature of the mainstream media. However, if Deborah Tannen of the New York Times is correct, our understanding of what it means to argue may be very different from what it once was; a “culture of critique” has developed within our media, and it relies on the exclusive opposition of two conflicting positions (Tannen). In her 1994 editorial, titled “The Triumph of the Yell”, Tannen claims that journalists, politicians and academics treat public discourse as an argument. Furthermore, she attempts to persuade her readers that this posturing of argument as a conflict leads to a battle, not a debate, and that we would be able to communicate the truth if this culture were not interfering. This paper will discuss the rhetorical strategies that Tannen utilizes, outline the support given in her editorial, and why her argument is less convincing than it should be.
For instance, after Romeo met Juliet, he quickly went to Friar Lawrence for advice. Granted, the Friar’s ideas were not always very smart, however, on first notice, he did try to bring some perspective and slow them down. When Friar Lawrence became aware of Romeo’s sudden change of heart, he exclaimed, “Holy Saint Francis, what a change is here! Is Rosaline, whom thou didst love so dear, So soon forsaken? young men's love then lies Not truly in their hearts, but in their eyes. (Shakespeare 2.3.1125) In this scene, the Friar gave Romeo a needed wake-up call, trying to make the boy aware of his fickle emotions. Romeo was head over heels for Juliet, and yet never even stopped loving Rosaline. He needed someone to snap him out of it and fortunately, the Friar tried to do so. However, correction is only useful when given by a loved one, so some may counter my opinion by saying that negative opinions can bring someone’s morale extremely low. For example, a young girl may see a billboard with a woman who has a body unlike hers, and so she begins to unhealthily strive to become that. This is a real situation and I agree, but to say that all other opinions are null is not wise. Some people may even carry thoughts about us that are really encouraging and uplifting that we can only take in if we ask for their thoughts. In addition to encouraging us, other people who are looking at a situation with fresh eyes may see something important that we did
I assume that if I ask for help, people will take it as a sign of impotence. This has led me to present poor quality work, that doesn't reflect what I can accomplish. It hasn't been easy, but over time I learned that it's convenient to ask for help and that everyone needs it to, at some point. When someone gives me their honest evaluation, I sense that in a way they are pointing out all my flaws. I know this isn't the case, but they can give me ten positive things and one negative thing about myself; I'll only remember the negative. I believe I don't take criticism well, or sometimes I get defensive about what they convey to me. People never expect to see me in front of a stage at all! Most of the time, I would scurry behind someone, when it came to presentations. My hands would get sweaty and my legs palpitate with terror. However this weakness I can overcome, which is why I decided to involve myself in a play.
Her research has shown that daughters describe a mother’s criticism as “ a magnifying glass held between the sun rays … concentration the rays of imperfection” (971). But for a mother a criticism is just a way to help her daughter improve. As sighted by Deborah “ Mothers subject their daughters to a level of scrutiny people usually reserve for themselves.” Meaning a mother will be a tough critic not because their daughter does not please them, but because a mother only wants what is best for their daughter.
Humans are imperfect. It 's crucial and enlightening to step out of ourselves once a while and look back as a third person. Solicit and appreciate honest feedback that shows us our weaknesses, so that we can work on it to be real, not perfect. However, for some of us, it 's not easy and I understand it. It 's not about how senior we are, how rich we are or even how talented we are, but it 's about how real we are to accept the fact that we are still imperfect.
I can handle constructive criticism very well. If I do something wrong then I would rather someone fix what I'm doing then to keep doing it wrong. I don't get sad, I am perfectly fine if someone fixes my mistakes. I don't take it personally and I know that I'm not perfect. I understand the benefits of getting feedback.
I tend to be quite critical of other speakers. Much of what I write is about what he or she
... to everyone else's idea about you. Pretty soon, it affects your life in a much larger way than anyone intended it to. Although at times we do it unintentionally, it does not change the fact that an individual can be hurt by a simple word. The author Jane Porter once wrote, "I never yet heard man or woman much abused that I was not inclined to think the better of them, and to transfer the suspicion or dislike to the one who found pleasure in pointing out the defects of another."
In Anatomy of Criticism, author Northrop Frye writes of the low mimetic tragic hero and the society in which this hero is a victim. He introduces the concept of pathos saying it “is the study of the isolated mind, the story of how someone recognizably like ourselves is broken by a conflict between the inner and outer world, between imaginative reality and the sort of reality that is established by a social consensus” (Frye 39). The hero of Hannah W. Foster’s novel, The Coquette undoubtedly suffers the fate of these afore mentioned opposing ideals. In her inability to confine her imagination to the acceptable definitions of early American female social behavior, Eliza Wharton falls victim to the ambiguity of her society’s sentiments of women’s roles. Because she attempts to claim the freedom her society superficially advocates, she is condemned as a coquette and suffers the consequences of exercising an independent mind. Yet, Eliza does not stand alone in her position as a pathetic figure. Her lover, Major Sanford -- who is often considered the villain of the novel -- also is constrained by societal expectations and definitions of American men and their ambition. Though Sanford conveys an honest desire to make Eliza his wife, society encourages marriage as a connection in order to advance socially and to secure a fortune. Sanford, in contrast to Eliza, suffers as a result of adhering to social expectations of a male’s role. While Eliza suffers because she lives her life outside of her social categorization and Sanford falls because he attempts to maneuver and manipulate the system in which he lives, both are victims of an imperfect, developing, American society.
Criticism is something that we all deal with daily and many of us believe that when we give criticism we are expertly doing so but as we receive criticism we tend to believe the other person is degrading us personally. Since criticism is mainly to judge merits and faults of a person or their actions, it is natural for us to feel defensive as we act the way we do based on the knowledge we have and we feel that the criticism questions our knowledge. Many of us may see criticism as such and act defensively towards it but according to an article called Giving and Receiving Criticism the author Sue Hadfield states, “Constructive criticism, however, can be helpful and lead to better working relations.” (Hadfield, 2013) With this in mind we can process that criticism can be used to give feedback to better ones position or knowledge in that which is being criticized. But how do we give criticism while staying in the favor of the criticized and when receiving criticism how do we differentiate between constructive and destructive criticism? Continuing in the article the author presents certain...
Get yourself moving. There is power in perspiration that can defeat stress. A few push-ups, curl-ups and an hour or two of jogging can make a difference in your emotional state. Meanwhile, as you perform different types of physical activities, bad elements that are causing your stress are gradually reduced. It burns away your anger, frustration, and tension, especially at work.
People who are criticized tend to go in the opposite direction from where the feedback
Other techniques to reducing stress, is listening to music, pampering yourself a massage/spa day, talking it out to family/friends, baking/cooking, praying/meditating and even playing with your pet.
The pros of exercise can maintain the levels of stress and anxiety in a variety of ways. Simple exercises like walking around your neighborhood or on a treadmill can ease the amount of stress in your life. Scientists say that a 10-minute walk temporary reduces anxiety and depression levels by 25% over the next 5 years of your life (Exercise for Stress and Anxiety). This study shows how simple,...
Knowing how to handle stress by using some strategies like deep breathing, yoga and meditation will help us bring back our mind and body in a state of balance since they are considered as effective techniques for stress management. Also, connecting face-to-face with other people, accepting one’s strengths and weaknesses, seeking help from others and having strong communication with our family and friends are just some ways to have a good emotional health. Furthermore, if you’re having a serious problem regarding your emotional health, you can seek a health professional for help and guidance.