How We Choose Romantic Partner Analysis

Selecting a romantic partner can be one of the best feelings in the world. There can be many ways that lead up to that partner even if it is true love and how well you know them. Also you will know how someone is the “right one” once you have known them for a while. Finding the right romantic partner is often a difficult journey, for several reasons. Perhaps you grew up in a household where there was no role model, healthy relationship and you doubt that such a thing even exists. Or maybe your dating history consists only of short, abrupt relationships where you or your partner gets bored too soon, and you don 't know how to make a relationship last. But there is always someone out there for you. One important aspect of choosing a romantic

First step would be checking your list. Establishing a checklist of desired qualities for a partner is a common practice, but it has two major flaws: It typically does not involve an evaluative hierarchy which would give each negative or positive quality a different weight; and it does not give significant weight to the connection between the two. The second would be detecting major flaws and the method of detecting major flaws is more sophisticated and realistic. It assumes the presence of flaws in each of us, and it focuses on major flaws. There is also the assumption here that one can learn to live with minor flaws, major flaws pose a substantial danger to a profound long-term loving relationship. Then finally the third would be bringing out the best in you and that means in determining the loving connection between the two, profound positive qualities are of great significance, especially for the long term. A positive quality that is particularly valuable for maintaining and enhancing the connection is if the prospective partners are likely to bring out the best in each

Psychological science has long been trying to answer this question, and with considerable success. Two main theories have guided scientific thinking on picking a partner. First is evolutionary theory, which claims that behavioral tendencies, physical characteristics, and personality features that promote our chances to survive and reproduce become, by that virtue, desirable to us. Secondly, the 'social role theory,’ developed by the American psychologist Alice Eagly, argues that social rather than biological processes dictate our social choices. As Blaise Pascal said “The winner is decided by a subjective internal process that is obscure and whimsical and does not necessarily obey the dictates of rationality, evolutionary mandates, cultural pressures, or even our own conscious will, plans or intentions. At the end of the day the heart has reasons that reason doesn’t