Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors in mate selection
Factors in mate selection
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Factors in mate selection
The Evolution of Human Mating
It may seem obvious to some why people mate, however there are many facets to human mating. Psychology has shown that reasons for mating have gone beyond the scope of love and physical attractiveness. People may search for mates who resemble archetypical images of the opposite-sex parent, mates with characteristics that are either complementary or similar to one's own qualities, or mates with whom to make an exchange of valuable resources (Buss 238). Although these theories play a key role in understanding patterns in human mating preferences, evolutionary psychology and sexual selection theory provide more concrete frameworks for explaining human mating.
Evolutionary framework for human mating is based on three elements. First, strategies for mating developed to solve specific problems in human evolutionary history. Second, people behave differently depending on the type of mating involved. There are two types of mating, short term and long term mating. Short term mating is defined as casual sex (i.e. one-night stands and brief affairs). Long term mating is seen as a committed relationship (i.e. dating, going steady, and marriage). Third, males and females developed different strategies due to the difference in problems they have had over the course of human evolution (Buss 241). This paper will examine those strategies specific to males.
Men have developed different mating strategies to solve problems in both long term and short term mating. In pursuing a short-term sexual strategy men face four man problems: partner number (variety), identifying women who are sexually accessible, identifying women who are fertile, and avoiding commitment and investment. Men evolved over evol...
... middle of paper ...
...ionary history, both men and women have evolved mechanisms that have functioned to solve adaptive problems that they encounter in pursuing successful long-term and short-term mating. These mechanisms along with behavior constitute the evolved sexual strategies of men and women. "Strategies are defined as evolved solutions to adaptive problems, with no consciousness or awareness on the part of the strategist implied (Buss, Schmitt 206)."
Bibliography:
Bibliography
Buss, David M. The Strategies of Human Mating. Psychological Review. pp. 238-249
(1994).
Buss, David M. and Schmitt, David P. Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary
Perspective on Human Mating. Psychological Review. Vol 100(2): 204-203.
(1993).
Ellis, Lee. Social stratification and socioeconomic inequality. Westport, CT: Praeger
Publishers. Vol 1: 111-137. (1993)
much the risk of loneliness as the challenge of exposure to more interesting men- and
Ellis, Kate. “Fatal Attraction, Or The Post-Modern Prometheus.” Journal of Sex Research 27.1 (1990): 111-22. Academic Search Complete. Web. 9 Feb. 2014. .
Actually monogamy had developed long before religion became interested. According to Fisher’s estimate, nearly every human society has been monogamous to some degree (69), and she claims that human beings have a biologically natural preference for mo...
In order to understand the present lifestyles relating to different approaches and tactics applied by humans in mate choice preferences, there is the need to refer to Darwin (1859, 1871) evolutionary perspectives. Darwin (1871) sexual selection is the driving force for males and females reproductive quest for their genes survival. These driving forces have been classified into two categories as intra-sexual and intersexual mate selection.Intersexual selection is male sexual selection process whereby males compete with other males and the females choose the strongest as their ideal partner. Intra-sexual selection occurs when the male species fight among themselves and the strongest gain access to females for
Kenrick’s ideas are supported by Buss’ 1994 experiment. Buss surveyed men and women in thirty seven countries to investigate important qualities in the opposite sex. The findings showed that women preferred resourcefulness and dependability whereas men valued chastity and youth. This study appears to support Kenrick’s “Parental Investment Theory” as Buss argues that men evolved to provide for their partners and are attracted to fertile women.
Despite the sound logic of the evolutionary argument, it does not account for what humans have had for a long time: contraception. This is why many people prefer to look at how this double standard formed from more of a sociological viewpoint. Women’s sexual con...
Andrews, 2011). In addition, the current Integrated Theory of Sexual
Although sex and love seems inextricably linked, our brain distinguishes between the two. Dr. Helen Fisher, anthropologist, believes that the initial purpose of reproduction influenced the evolution of love. According to her, love consists of three functions. Sex drive, the first function, is intended to keep sexes interested in each other for long enough. Romantic love is to love one person at a time. It is the root of the beginnings of family. The third is attachment or as we say "true love." True love ensures the happiness of the couples, gives their offspring the best chance for survival. The Greek and Roman mythology has stories that represent true love where sex isn’t important at all. The tale of Cupid and Psyche describes the overcoming of obstacles to their love, and their ultimate union.
Eli J. Finkel and Paul W. Eastwick authors of this article whom are student and faculty member of Northwestern University explored sex difference between man and woman in pursuing romantic relationships. Is there a sex difference in romantic selectivity? In this paper, I will be reviewing the article, provide critiques, identify the central question of the article, and suggest areas for further research. Finkel and Eastwick (2009) suggest working with speed dating measures is well matched to examine the hypothesis related to romantic selectivity.
Who we desire is driven by powerful evolutionary forces, but while most of us are drawn to looks first (whether or not we admit it), human attraction is far more complex than it appears at first sight.
In non-human animals, it is typically the males that engage in intrasexual competition and females that exercise intersexual choice. This is apparent in the morphological and behavioural differences between the sexes. Trivers (1972) argues that this is so due to differential investment in offspring between the sexes, which makes access to females a limiting resource in males' reproductive success. In other words, males compete, females choose. In this essay I shall critically discuss the evidence that this pattern exists in humans. In terms of competition between males, I will consider aspects of the male body, such as size and strength, in addition to psychological characteristics such as aggression, and the drive to seek status. In regards
Similar to physical fitness, sexuality has everything to do with attitude and effort. A perfect metaphor is "like riding a bike." The initial stages of learning to ride a bike requires effort, persistence, mental focus, and determination. Once achieved, a person never loses this ability and merely needs to refresh their skill set even after time has elapsed from riding. Sexual fitness is based on the exact same concepts.
We turn to our friend and look for support and advice during times of need. We search potential mates for courtship, mating and marriage. Most of us recognize relationship as most important part of our lives. People across the globe describe that the quality of relationship between individuals determine overall satisfaction of life. Relationships are vital part of our sociocultural, historical and political context. Close relationships are found globally; but because of the expressions of these relationship based on culture, they are vary significantly. Culture have impact on what is considered appropriate in attraction and mate selection, in expression of love and sexuality and in the form of marriage and divorce.
The Evolution of Sexuality Introduction Sexuality is a part of every human being’s natural make-up, and in recent years there has been a great deal of research and a corresponding increase in scientific understanding of what sexuality is, how it has been perceived in history contrasted to the 21 st century, and if there has been a progression through architecture and designs to be more gender neutral. The topic presented is whether or not sexuality’s history has progressed towards a more unified and less oppressive standpoint and had architecture and various designs kept up with the changes in accommodation and become less oppressive regarding modern designing. There has been a myriad of social movements throughout the last few decades, and
Bd 3. Kurzban, R., & Weeden, J. (2004, August 24). HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Retrieved June 9, 2015, from http://www.sas.upenn.edu/psych/PLEEP/pdfs/2005 Kurzban & Weeden EHB.pdf 4.