Globalisation Of Mental Health Essay

734 Words2 Pages

‘Globalisation may be defined as a process in which the traditional boundaries separating individuals and societies gradually and increasingly recede. This process is changing the nature of human interaction in many spheres: economic, political, social, cultural, environmental and technological. It is changing the way we perceive time and space, and the way we think about the world and ourselves’ (Kunitz 2000) Mental health disorders cause disability across the globe. Western countries, such as the United Kingdom and the United States, have well established services for treating mental distress and similar services are beginning to be set up in more developing countries. There are major inequalities in the availability of mental health support …show more content…

However, it must be discussed who the Globalisation of mental health systems really benefits. Is the Globalisation of the Western conception of mental illness the answer? Is it our place to dictate to the world what madness is and where it comes from? Ethan Watters in his 2010 essay ‘The Americanization of Mental Illness’ suggests that perhaps the attempt by the West to educate the planet on mental illnesses, has actually created problems that did not previously exist. Watters writes that Western researchers run almost all scholarly journals and host the psychiatry conferences, Western pharmaceutical companies spend billions marketing medications to ‘cure’ mental distress and Western-trained psychologists are sent over to help in areas of war and natural disasters as professionals to help cure the nation of its distress. But, what makes us know better than them? It has actually been suggested that individuals suffering with, what the West would call, Schizophrenia receive more helpful treatment in some developing countries. In Zanzibar, East Africa, Schizophrenia was seen as …show more content…

Research is carried out by the companies eager to prove the effectiveness of their new products. More people with the diagnosis, means more people who need the treatment. In addition, it has been suggested that most funding for psychiatric meetings comes from pharmaceutical companies. There is no argument that the western ideas of mental health is changing expressions of illness in other countries. For example, when first introduced antidepressants failed to take off in Japan, so marketing efforts have encouraged a complete change in the way depression is viewed in the country. Therefore, in the last few years, the market for antidepressants in Japan has grown enormously because of the movement towards recognising human suffering in ways that suit the interests of the western pharmaceutical industry. It is not enough for them just to convince the West that their sadness is ‘depression’ and their shyness is ‘social anxiety disorder’. These western views are increasingly being used to sell drugs worldwide; often with little or no evidence of their effectiveness. So therefore, the questions remain: Is it fair for the West to impose their knowledge of mental illness on other nations? Who does this really

Open Document