The Formation of Relationships

1476 Words3 Pages

The Formation of Relationships Attraction can be defined as an individual's tendency to evaluate someone in a positive way. Attraction is a multifactorial emotion. That is, several factors have an influence on interpersonal attraction. Four main explanations have been developed to account for why we develop particular relationships. Proximity - this is the single most important predictor in who we will develop relationships with, and is termed the 'propinquity effect'. We develop a certain familiarity with people we see regularly, which is positive, in that it allows us to get to know more about their behaviour. Also, the more frequent the interaction, the less effort has to be made within it. From a sociobiological perspective, it benefits us to socialise and co-operate with others who are close to us, because if we are pleasant, and give favours to others, we are more likely to receive them back. Research into proximity - this includes Segals' 1974 study in which he monitored the friendships made by police cadets, who were made to sit next to each other in alphabetical order of their surnames in the classroom. People whose names were close together in the alphabet, formed relationships with each other, more readily than those who were far apart alphabetically. Festinger (1950) interviewed married students living in apartments, and found they were 10 times more likely to have friends within the same block, (and furthermore, on the same floor), than in other apartments in the local area. Similarity - this indicates that people are attracted to others of a similar age, gender, intelligence, and who have similar at... ... middle of paper ... ...independent enough to look after itself. Sociobiological theory has been criticised for oversimplifying complex human behaviour. It doesn't take into account cultural differences. For example, it may be possible that men desire attractive women because they are surrounded by media images of such women, and because they learn from an early age that they should be aiming to get into a relationship with that sort of women. Also, sociobiological theory uses hindsight to explain current behaviour patterns, and has no predictive power. You could easily explain any type of behaviour using this theory because it is so broad. If men were more faithful, then you could easily modify the theory, and say that this was the case because men knew that their offspring wouldn't survive, without them around to help take care of it.

Open Document