Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Examine platos critice of democracy
Plato's critique of democracy
Examine platos critice of democracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Examine platos critice of democracy
The Divided Line
The Divided Line (The Republic , Book VI)
Socrates
You have to imagine, then, that there are two ruling powers, and that one of them is set over the intellectual world, the other over the visible. I do not say heaven, lest you should fancy that I am playing upon the name. May I suppose that you have this distinction of the visible and intelligible fixed in your mind?
Glaucon
I have.
Socrates
Now take a line which has been cut into two unequal parts and divide each of them again in the same proportion, and suppose the two main divisions to answer, one to the visible and the other to the intelligible, and then compare the subdivisions in respect of their clearness and want of clearness, and you will find that the first section in the sphere of the visible consists of images. And by images I mean, in the first place, shadows, and in the second place, reflections in water and in solid, smooth and polished bodies and the like: Do you understand?
Glaucon
Yes, I understand.
Socrates
Imagine, now, the other section, of which this is only the resemblance, to include the animals which we see, and everything that grows or is made.
Glaucon
Very good.
Socrates
Would you not admit that both the sections of this division have different degrees of truth, and that the copy is to the original as the sphere of opinion is to the sphere of knowledge? 1
Glaucon
Most undoubtedly.
Socrates
Next proceed to consider the manner in which the sphere of the intellectual is to be divided.
Glaucon
In what manner?
Socrates
Thus: There are two subdivisions, in the lower of which the soul uses the figures given by thw former division as images; the enquiry can only be hypothetic...
... middle of paper ...
...Whereas if they go to the administration of public affairs, poor and hungering after their own private advantage, thinking that hence they are to snatch the chief good, order there can never be; for they will be fighting about office, and the civil and domestic broils which thus arise will be the ruin of the rulers themselves and of the whole State.
Glaucon
Most true, he replied.
Socrates
And the only life which looks down upon the life of political ambition is that of true philosophy. Do you know of any other?
Glaucon
Indeed, I do not, he said.
Socrates
And those who govern ought not to be lovers of the task? For, if they are, there will be rival lovers, and they will fight.
Glaucon
No question.
Socrates
Who then are those whom we shall compel to be guardians? Surely they will be the men who are wisest about affairs of the state.
Maintaining feudal conditions through violence and intimidation, the army holds the populace in a constant state of fear. Guaranteeing that the peasants stay ill and in need furthers the necessity that they work to stay alive, but prevents them from doing so. This is the paradox of the poor worker, but one the army does not see. The army blindly kills anyone who tries to help the peasants, murdering all the doctors and priests that enter the villages. They do so to keep the peasants in need and in ignorance, to prevent them from learning another way of life. Lacking knowledge of the outside world ensures that the peasants will remain in the plantations, because fear of the unknown is stronger than fear of the known. Acting as feudal knights, the army forces people into the feudal plantation relationship using fear and intimidation.
For there was an extreme inequality amongst them, and their state was overloaded with a multitude of indigent and necessitous persons, while its whole wealth centered upon a very few. To the end therefore, that he might expel from the state arrogance and envy, luxury and crime, and those yet more inveterate diseases of want and superfluity (Plutarch 9).
" Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith, and of public and personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority."
...st not abuse what is given to them, which in this was power and wealth.
National aspirations must be respected; peoples may now be dominated, and…[may now] be governed only by the...
... an entire community can fall apart, by doing his job the ruler ensures his success, “this can be improved only through the equitable treatment of people with property and regard for them, so that their hopes rise, and they have the incentive to start making their capitol bear fruit and grow. This, in turn, increases the ruler’s revenues in taxes” (Khaldun 1734). A ruler must know that subjects have an important role and he does as well; however, he must never confuse this role because it leads to his downfall as well as those who look up to him.
reasoning than desire. So we see two distinct parts of the soul. The first is
In conclusion, Plato and Aristotle present two different conceptions of the soul. By examination of their formulations, and the structure and genre they used, Aristotle's perception of the soul is more convincing. I am more convinced by facts than I am ideals. But his views should not be thrown away, for Aristotle's focus upon the organism as a whole as the proper object of study is a successful approach to the question of the nature of and relationship between mind, body, and soul.
“There are some who lack confidence in the integrity and capacity of the people to govern themselves. To all who entertain such fears I will most respectfully say that I entertain none… If man is not capable, and it not to be trusted with the government of himself, is he to be trusted with the government of others… Who, then, will govern? The answer must be, man – for we have no angels in the shape of men, as yet, who are willing to take charge...
...e the authority of the very thing that gave them their power. In other words, don’t bite the hand that feeds.
the same basic materials, including the same beliefs and the same values, the same EVERYTHING. And together it all appears to be one "reality" (Barry Alfonso, 6)."
men say we be men of good government, being governed as the sea is, by our novle
...of the body, and no problem arises of how soul and body can be united into a substantial whole: ‘there is no need to investigate whether the soul and the body are one, any more than the wax and the shape, or in general the matter of each thing and that of which it is the matter; for while “one” and “being” are said in many ways, the primary [sense] is actuality’ (De anima 2.1, 12B6–9).Many twentieth-century philosophers have been looking for just such a via media between materialism and dualism, at least for the case of the human mind; and much scholarly attention has gone into asking whether Aristotle’s view can be aligned with one of the modern alternatives, or whether it offers something preferable to any of the modern alternatives, or whether it is so bound up with a falsified Aristotelian science that it must regretfully be dismissed as no longer a live option.
In Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together, Isaacs explains how we can do improved than that. Isaacs, who is Director of the Dialogue Project at MIT and a advisor to main corporations, counting AT&T and Intel, believes that business, supporting and individual announcement can be a procedure of philosophy together--as different to philosophy unaided and then tiresome to encourage others of our positions by refusing to believe other opinions, preservation information, and eventually getting annoyed and self-protective. This is not pie-in-the-sky, let's-all-hold-hands-and-sing substance. He offers existing ideas for both listening and dialogue; for avoiding the forces that challenge important discussion; for altering the bodily setting of the discourse to change its excellence. The conclusion, he says, can be fairly dissimilar from the customary winner-loser organization of arguments and debates. Businesses can build more logical decisions and thus make more money. Governments can generate passive resolutions to apparently obdurate problems. (As an instance of this, Isaacs cites covert conversations among Nelson Mandela and F.W. de Klerk in South Africa, which o...
... of the majority, the minority endures oppression. The quality of government suffers when it has been mixed too much with religion, and the quality of religious motives suffer when they have been polluted by political motives.