The Difference Between Booker T. Washington And W. E. B. Dubois

617 Words2 Pages

After the Civil War, southern blacks were free but struggled to find their place in society. Although they were not slaves, they were not considered first class citizens. They did not have equal rights, equal social or economic status, and they did not have the right to vote. This placed them at a great disadvantage while trying to survive and support their families. They needed a way out or a way up. There were two prominent figures at this time that presented different avenues to uplift the black community. They were Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Dubois. To navigate these two avenues, one must understand the backgrounds of these two men. The two avenues that these men presented were probably different because they came from different backgrounds. Booker T. Washington was born a slave in the Southern state of Virginia. Growing up in the south, Washington experienced the harsh reality of being a slave before being emancipated. He also was familiar with the prejudice and struggle of the freed black man in the south. After being emancipated, he enrolled in Hampton Institute to improve his plight. He eventually became the founder of Tuskegee …show more content…

He thought blacks should go along with the status quo and not fight for equal rights. He felt that blacks should not “rock the boat”. He thought that this only angered the white people even more. He believed that blacks would gain better economic and social status if they made themselves more valuable to the white man. They would do this by first obtaining an education that focused on skills and industry. He believed if blacks made themselves skilled laborers then this would mutually benefit both the blacks and the whites. Once the whites realized that these skills that the blacks had acquired made them prosper they would eventually accept blacks as their equal. “The philosophy of Washington was one of accommodation to white oppression” (Gibson

Open Document