Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The cultural industries theory
Advantages of industrialization
Advantages of industrialization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The cultural industries theory
Introduction to Cultural Industries:
According to UNESCO, Culture industries can be defined as “It is a series of activities in which cultural products and cultural services are produced according to industry standards, reproduced, stored and distributed.”
The idea of cultural industries has been constantly improved. It is branched into two parts now, “academician” and “practician”. Academician usually characterize the cultural industry from “theoretical-ideological” attitude, however, practician usually target the culture industry’s marketability through socio-economic practices, for territorial differences and its quick development, the scope that cultural industry covers is becoming wider, some countries called it, “content industries”,
…show more content…
At pre-industrial era, people initiated material production. In the 20th Century, the material production were at access, then entering the post-industrial era, the industry civilization was exchanged from material production to cultural production. Previously, the manufacturing of popular culture product need very high competence, therefore quantity production was inconceivable. Furthermore, the price was high, so the industry was always controlled by wealthy. However, this kind of cartel was broken on the basis of science and technological development. Cultural products are no longer art works asserting artists, they are assets of mass production for competing people’s artistic needs. In 1947, Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimes, the representatives of Frankfurt school of thought, used the word of culture industry for the first time to differentiate the mass culture in their book.
Cultural Industry:
The concept of cultural industry was suggested by Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimes and other experts who are intellectual of Frankfurt school of thoughts. The aspects holding by Adorno in his work is that the cultural industry can deliberately merge itself with customer of all levels. This work illustrate the end of the early critique theory.
Then, Adorno used cultural industry to define the impact of cultural events and cultural products on society. The combined outcome of the cultural industry is
…show more content…
The intensions are to arrange and manage creativity.
Bilton starts his argument by defining the creativity process. According to the writer, creativity must meet to criteria; it must produce something new, and it must produce cerebral property which is profitable or advantageous. Therefore ideas that are “Too far out of the box” are unique but not inevitably valuable. The creativity he sees important is not that which is found with individual but with networks of individuals within organizations. He is not worried with individual progressive activity. The networks are groups of individuals who cooperate as teams and whose members play multiple roles. They “step in and out of character” as they promote new processes or
“Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception” is a chapter in Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer’s book “Dialectic of Enlightenment” it goes onto discus the conflicts presented by the “culture industry.” Adorno states that the culture industry is a main phenomenon of late capitalism, encompassing all products from Hollywood films, to advertisements, and even extending to musical compositions. Adorno is very deliberate in noting the term “culture industry” over “mass culture” this was done to specifically distinguish, that it is not to be understood as something which spontaneously stems from the masses themselves.
“…the culture industry has brought about the false elimination of the distance between art and life, and this also allows one to recognize the contradictoriness of the avant-gardiste undertaking: the result is that the Avant-garde, for all its talk of purging art of affirmation with forces of production consumption, became an accomplice in the total subsumption of Art under capitalism.”
The begging of World War II not only changed countries, economic structures and politics but also had an enormous influence on different sides of life of people and societies. Well-known from the historical experience is the fact that every single of such size as World War always has its resonance on arts, as culture is an inseparable part of people’s lives. Talking of WWII, the response within artistic communities was so strong that artists became a part of the ideological war of the time (Martin). The position of lots of creative people was at the same time very fearful, as they found themselves in occupied countries under the threat of totalitarian regimes and had to immigrate
Marx uses the term ‘postcapitalist appropriation’ to denote not theory, but neotheory. However, Lyotard’s analysis of constructivism holds that the media is part of the collapse of art.
Finally is the investigation of the conditions and appropriate environment for the effective presentation of the artwork. This requires the artist to have extensive knowledge of the specific art industry. In the context of the music industry music promoters and designers will have a greater role to play in order to have good presentation and promoting the music artwork.
With the rise of industrialization, globalization, and mass production, the manufacturing productivity has been dramatically increased and accordingly the availability of consumer goods. And with the rise of the mass media, various products have been targeted on broad groups of consumers. Consumerism, which is propelled by a system of mass production and high levels of consumption, has been one of the themes in art works from twentieth century till now.
... rising status of creative class. The question mark might be drawn upon to what extent women as much as men in the creative class are playing role in modern creative society to boost economic growth.
This chapter focuses on how the immediate social context shapes popular culture. This includes artists, animators, television writers/actors, and musicians (to name a few) who actually create popular culture and how the context of their work doesn’t always govern what they produce. Within popular culture, there are three realities to consider: the technological constraints, the organizational apparatus, and the legal system. With technological constraints, it deals with the production and manufacturing of popular culture. The organizational apparatus consists of the structure of which popular culture is promoted and sold. The legal system relates to how the whole process is regulated. Examples of the legal system can be seen with copyright laws and how they impact the content of music albums, which is why albums nowadays don’t have free samples of other songs. With the organizational apparatus, what the people receive is mostly a
The Arts and Crafts movement occurred during the late 19th century and early 20th century. Its aim was “to bring artists and craftsmen together.” The movement developed from the fear that art was being lost to the up and coming manufacturing field (“The Bauhaus”). However, Gropius knew manufacturing would be a big part of the future and promoted art that could be mass-produced by factories. In 1923, the school’s slogan be...
Theodore Adorno and Max Horkheimer were two renowned Jewish representatives of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory; they were particularly dominant during the early 20th century, approximately around the time of the 1920’s to 1960s. They took refuge in America after Adolf Hitler’s rise in Germany. These to philosophers developed the ‘Culture Industry Theory’ in the 1940s, in light of the disturbed society they had seen during this time. They witnessed how Nazi Fascism used mass media such as films, radio and newspapers to brainwash millions into partaking in this ideology. Similarly they saw the rise of Capitalism in America, which also used mass media such as Hollywood films and advertising to disseminate the masses into the capitalist Ideology. This essay will evaluate how the ‘culture industry’ had profound social impacts in society and examine weather it is valid in contemporary society.
Initially, it was suggested by Adorno that culture was a byproduct of commodities. Over time, this idea was challenged by Hall and others, who described culture as something which is both a complex and dynamic socially constructed system involving the use of codes and signifiers. Culture is not simply defined by the materialistic “things” that society consume, but by the expression of value or significance towards ideas and objects. Culture is not something that is simply that is thrust upon us, but something that we choose to identify with and partake in. It is defined as a “way of life...undertaken by a particular group of people at a particular time”(Reference cambridge). For example, it is not the production of tv shows that creates a culture, it is the investment of the audience who familiarise and identify with the show that is seen as culture. It is not the availability of certain products, i.e. Apple iPhones, that creates a culture, it is the joining of a vast group of people who enjoy similar interests, emotions or thoughts about same product or idea that creates a culture. Culture provides an avenue for people to express a shared meaning within society. It is through culture that social norms and order within society can be
Living in a modern time, our lives can hardly be separated from creativity and culture. Creative industries have increasingly influenced our daily lives, not just the products we use, but also the money we make. According to DCMS (2014), creative industries in Britain are worth more than £70 billion to its economy every year, not to mention creative industries in other countries. In the following, the seven economic properties as stated in Caves (2000) will be applied to the creative industry, ‘New Media’. ‘New Media’ is one of the nine creative industries proposed in the UNCTAD’s
The term postmodernism is applied to several disciplines which include architecture, art, literature, music, film, sociology, cultural and media studies, visual arts, philosophy, history. Communications and technology. The beginning of postmodernism is quite unclear, however, it emerged as an area of academic study in mid- 1980s. "Postmodernism" is an outcome of the deep changes in social and political life style in post-industrialized societies with an attitude to question the truth and authority put forth by such conditions. Critics have constantly been debating about the treatment of the prefix “post” in "postmodernism". According to some critics, the "post" designates a process of historical succession. For them, "Postmodernism" is something that either follows or replaces what is known as "modernism". A consensus is yet to be reached about whether postmodernism is a break from modernism, a continuation of modernism or even both. Noorbakhsh Hooti offers three uses of the term “postmodernism”. “First, postmodernism represents a number of developments in the arts and culture in the latter half of the twentieth century. The reference point and point of departure for this type of postmodernism are the different forms of modernism that developed in the arts and culture in Europe in the first half of the century. Second, it designates the rise of new frameworks of social and economic organization, again approximately since the end of the 1939-45 war. As such, its reference point and point of departure is the tendency of modernization which specified the early years of the century, with the development of industry, the growth of the mass market, and the speed in automation, travel and mass communication. Third, it indicate...
McShane, Steven, and Mary Ann Von Glinow. Chapter 8: Decision Making and Creativity. PRIMIS MNO 6202: Managing Organizations. 2004. The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' Reprint of the book.
Art can be interpreted in varying ways. One could take the Kantian approach by placing special importance on art’s autonomy, while proclaiming that art prescribes to its own set of self-created maxims. These maxims facilitate the creation of normative idea of art, where excellent is determined by how well it meets arts self-created maxims. Therefore the Mona Lisa is only a good painting because it greatly conforms to the maxims of the art normative. Another approach would be the Hegelian interpretation that states that art is the “highest human vocation.” In this way art shows humanity normative of human existence in a way that shows the worthiness of human society. However, there is a problem with both sets of interpretation—they associated with the Enlightenment. This problem proves to be a fatal flaw, and only with a mixture of both is it possible to fully ascertain art. It was using this method that Theodore Adorno’s philosophy was able to accomplish art in its fullest.