Creative Class Analysis

726 Words2 Pages

In the Rise of the Creative Class, Richard Florida claims that the society is shifting from social to creative capital and the creative class is flourishing. By creative class, Florida (2002) means groups which include professionals such as writers, innovators, scientists, engineers, consultants, media people, authors, architects, designers, musicians and artists. Those are persons who use their creative mind and skills to attract money. They are people who find challenging and flexible jobs attractive to them. When they work, they look for chances of personal development. In the United State of America, according to Florida, the creative class composites more than 30 per cent of the workforce. Florida (2002) defines creativity as the ability to synthesize. In his book, he claims creativity as the “decisive source” of competitive advantage and that creative class is the prominent driving force of economic development. Creativity in artistic and cultural forms has involved in inspiring economic and technological creativity and it is believed that, in that sense, economy moves from a system of company-centered to more of a mechanism of people-driven. Florida stresses on the importance of creativity in economic development by linking the two spectrums, economic and creativity. “Economic growth is driven by human creativity,” (Florida 2002). He made a strong argument that a community cannot achieve economic development without creativity. Florida also mentioned that because creativity is mostly to be noted in the urban environment, it is going to be ultimately a hotspot for economic development in the future. He believes that geography becomes more essential as the creative class utilizes its mobility to access to diverse and... ... middle of paper ... ... rising status of creative class. The question mark might be drawn upon to what extent women as much as men in the creative class are playing role in modern creative society to boost economic growth. Florida (2002) also discusses attractive factors of creative class. Those factors, as he named them, are technology, talent, and tolerance which he called 3Ts. According to the claims he made in his book, a question of “is the 3Ts enough?” came to my mine. Obviously, technology brought both advantages and disadvantages for any communities. Building skilled and educated workforce and incorporating tolerance in company or industry can be seen as key factors to industry’s prosperity and economic growth. However, some other components such as leadership, incentive, safety, innovation and relevant encouraging motives must contribute to institutional and economic progress.

Open Document