The Cost-Benefit Analysis

521 Words2 Pages

Remember back in school when your parents would bribe you to get all A’s in your classes? Although it may seem like a good idea to pay students for grades, in the long run it just wouldn’t work out. If students were to be paid for good grades the price would be far too high, parents already pay taxes, and school is a privilege that should be taken advantage of.
Spark, the company at hand, doesn’t have the ability to pay 19 billion dollars every year. In Pay-To-Learn Schemes Shortchanges Kids by Wendy Grolnick she writes, “Paid out nearly 1 million to 1616 students.” She also writes, ¨over the last 35 years , dozens of studies have shown that rewarding people after learning ends up backfiring.¨ With the company starting in 2004, how did it fund all of this money? Well the answer to this- donations. However, there is a flaw in the system-- in 2016 they only …show more content…

Though, the main problem is with companies like “Spark” -paying kids to go to school, paying them for good grades, taking tests, and doing well on them, etc. The issue with paying kids across the country and across all schools and districts is that these corporations cannot afford to promise and pay all these kids money. It’s too expensive, for each student they can be paid/earn up to $500 for coming to school everyday, taking advanced tests, and keeping good grades. These companies won't be able to promise this long term and keep up with dispersing money and this whole operation will have to be accessible by the government. Having the government fund such things and paying reforms will have to open up new budgets economically for our school systems. This intern will end up having the parents of these students paying more money in taxes and having their money sent into these government funding systems which would make this

Open Document