Civil Rights issues have been very hot topics in the United States for years now. It always seems that one group thinks they have an unfair disadvantage. The Supreme Court has been involved in many cases regarding Civil Rights. Some rulings have sided with the Civil Rights movement and some have sided against the Civil Rights movement. Some of the groups involved are African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians. Overall the Supreme Court has played a role in helping to advance the Civil Rights in the United States.
Dred Scott v. Sandford was a major Supreme Court case that was decided in 1857. This particular case sided against the Civil Rights movement. The case involved a free African American that was a former slave in Missouri. Between 1833
…show more content…
Ferguson was another case that ruled against the civil rights movement. The case was brought on because of a law in Louisiana that required there to be separate railway cars for blacks and whites (www.oyez.org/Plessy). In 1892 Homer Plessy took a seat in the white rail car. He refused to move and he was arrested. The court ruled that the law was constitutional. They ruled that as long as the facilities were equal that blacks and whites could be separated. This became known as the “separate but equal” case. The case was a major blow to the civil rights movement legally. What this case did do was that it made the public aware of what was going on. More people were angered about how blacks were treated as a result of this Supreme Court …show more content…
Bakke was another win for the Civil Rights movement, though this one wasn’t as big as Brown v. Board of Education. The case came about when a thirty-five-year-old man named Allan Bakke was denied entrance to the University of California twice (www.oyez.org/Regents). The University of California reserved sixteen places in each freshman class for qualified minorities, even if a white had better test scores or a higher g.p.a. The university said that they did that to get more minorities in the medical field, a field which at the time was dominated by whites. Allan Bakke claimed that the school 's admission policy violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the fourteenth amendment (www.pbs.org/Regents). The Supreme Court ruled that the university’s use of racial quotas was unconstitutional but the school 's use of affirmative action was constitutional (www.pbs.org/Regents). The court justified their ruling by saying that a college can use race as an admissions factor but they must use other factors as well. So basically being a minority does not mean that you are automatically admitted to a college but it can help thanks to affirmative action. Affirmative action is still used by universities today thanks to the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case. It helps struggling minority groups get a fair opportunity when it comes to an
In 1846, African slave Dred Scott sued for his freedom on the grounds that he resided in the free states of Illinois and the Wisconsin/Minnesota territory to serve his owner. In 1854, Scott appealed his case to the Supreme Court, seeking to reverse the District court’s decision declaring him still a slave. In 1856, the case began, however the freedom of Dred Scott was not the only issue the court addressed, they also had to decide can blacks be citizens, the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, and can Congress prohibit slavery in federal territories. A year later the Supreme Court handed down its decision, “they dismissed the case of due to lack of
Dred Scott vs. Sandford was a very influential case during the mid-1800s. The case took place in 1857; however, the events leading up to it began in 1833. Dr. John Emerson had bo...
The Plessy v Ferguson case was an example that there was still discrimination in America. In 1890, Louisiana passed a law called the Separate Car Act that says all railroad
They arrested Plessy, who claimed that the law violated his thirteenth and fourteenth amendment rights. When found guilty, he brought the case to the Louisiana State Supreme Court, but they confirmed the court's decision. Plessy then took the case “Plessy v. Ferguson” to the United States Supreme Court; however, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of Ferguson because they found that the laws attempted to enforce equality before the law, and not in social situations (Harlan 1). This famous case started the official acceptance of separate but equal laws, but what happened because of this? In the first twenty years of the separate Equal Laws being in effect, the various minorities suffered multiple consequences.
The case of brown v. board of education was one of the biggest turning points for African Americans to becoming accepted into white society at the time. Brown vs. Board of education to this day remains one of, if not the most important cases that African Americans have brought to the surface for the better of the United States. Brown v. Board of Education was not simply about children and education (Silent Covenants pg 11); it was about being equal in a society that claims African Americans were treated equal, when in fact they were definitely not. This case was the starting point for many Americans to realize that separate but equal did not work. The separate but equal label did not make sense either, the circumstances were clearly not separate but equal. Brown v. Board of Education brought this out, this case was the reason that blacks and whites no longer have separate restrooms and water fountains, this was the case that truly destroyed the saying separate but equal, Brown vs. Board of education truly made everyone equal.
"Histories, like ancient ruins, are the fictions of empires. While everything forgotten hands in dark dreams of the past, ever threatening to return...”, a quote from the movie Velvet Goldmine, expresses the thoughts that many supporters of integration may have felt because no one truly knew the effects that one major verdict could create. The Brown v. Board of Education decision was a very important watershed during the Civil Rights Movement. However, like most progressive decisions, it did not create an effective solution because no time limit was ever given. James Baldwin realized that this major oversight would lead to a “broken promise.”
The next big step in the civil rights movement came in 1954, with the BROWN vs. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA case, where Thurgood Marshall, representing Brown, argued that segregation was against the 4th Amendment of the American constitution. The Supreme Court ruled, against President Eisenhower’s wishes, in favour of Brown, which set a precedent in education, that schools should no longer be segregated. This was the case which completely overturned the Jim Crow Laws by overturning Plessy vs. Ferguson.
After the Plessy vs Ferguson verdict a lot of civil rights activists were outraged. A prominent African American group rose and fought against racial discrimination. The National Association of the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) fought against many different racial cases. For example, George McLaurin was accepted to a doctrine program at the University of Oklahoma("HISTORY OF BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION") . However, McLaurin was asked by the University that he had to sit apart from the class and eat at a separate time than the whites. McLaurin was confused about this and hired Thurgood Marshall from the NAACP to help him defend his rights. Thurgood Marshall fought for McLaurin...
Dred Scott was a slave in the slave state of Missouri. In 1834, he was taken to Illinois and the Wisconsin Territories, which was considered free land under the Missouri Compromise. Sanford was not Scott's owner. Mrs. Emerson arranged to sell Dred Scott to her brother John Stanford. Though his name was misspelled as "Sanford",it became attached to the legal case. Stanford was left in charge of the ongoing legal battle. Scott fought to buy freedom for himself and his family, In 1856, he filed a law suit in the court of Missouri for his freedom. In March of 1857, Scott's law suit was taken to the United States Supreme Court. In the Dred Scott v. Sanford case, the Supreme Court ruled against Dred Scott. According to the...
Declared in the U.S. Constitution every American or should it be person, is guaranteed civil rights. Civil rights did not just consist of “freedom of speech and assembly,” but as well as “the right to vote, the right to equal protection under the law, and procedural guarantees in criminal and civil rights,” (Dawood). It was not until 1791, that the Bill of Rights was appended to the constitution, which helped clarify these rights to citizens. “Rights were eventually applied against actions of the state governments in a series of cases decide by the Supreme Court,” Dawood stated. In previous years (1790-1803), the Supreme Court had little say in decisions being made by government. As time went on the Supreme Court took on more responsibility and started making additional decisions, which in time helped minorities gain their civil rights. It took a couple of years, as a matter of fact till the 1900’s for the Supreme Court to get out of the “ideology of white supremacy and the practice of racism,” (Smith). Though the decisions of the Supreme Court were not all that appreciated in the beginning, following the 20th century the court really facilitated in the advancements of civil rights.
Success was a big part of the Civil Rights Movement. Starting with the year 1954, there were some major victories in favor of African Americans. In 1954, the landmark trial Brown vs. The Board of Education of Topeka Kansas ruled that segregation in public education was unfair. This unanimous Supreme Court decision overturned the prior Plessy vs. Ferguson case during which the “separate but equal” doctrine was created and abused. One year later, Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr. launched a bus boycott in Montgomery Alabama after Ms. Parks was arrested for not giving up her seat in the “colored section”. This boycott, which lasted more than a year, led to the desegregation of buses in 1956. Group efforts greatly contributed to the success of the movement. This is not only shown by the successful nature of the bus boycott, but it is shown through the success of Martin Luther King’s SCLC or Southern Christian Leadership Conference. The conference was notable for peacefully protesting, nonviolence, and civil disobedience. Thanks to the SCLC, sit-ins and boycotts became popular during this time, adding to the movement’s accomplishments. The effective nature of the sit-in was shown during 1960 when a group of four black college students sat down at a Woolworth’s lunch counter in hopes of being served. While they were not served the first time they commenced their sit-in, they were not forced to leave the establishment; their lack of response to the heckling...
In 1857, the Dred Scott vs. Sanford case went before a pro-slavery United States Supreme Court. Scott claimed that he had lived as a slave in free state and territory. The high court’s decision was that he was a slave and that the law assuring that slavery would not be allowed in the new territories of the United States was unconstitutional. Because of the court’s decision, it helped accelerate the Civil War. Because of the Supreme Court’s decision, the Northerners tha...
The Dred Scott Case had a huge impact on the United States as it is today. The Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments have called it the worst Supreme Court decision ever rendered and was later overturned. The Dred Scott Decision was a key case regarding the issue of slavery; the case started as a slave seeking his rightful freedom and mushroomed into a whole lot more. 65
The Civil Rights Movement of the 50's and 60's was arguably one of the most formative and influential periods in American history. Hundreds of thousands of civil rights activists utilized non violent resistance and civil disobedience to revolt against racial segregation and discrimination. The Civil Rights Movement began in the southern states but quickly rose to national prominence. It is of popular belief that the civil rights movement was organized by small groups of people, with notable leaders like—Martin Luther King, Jr, Rosa Parks, Medgar Evers, and even John F. Kennedy—driving the ship. That is partly correct. The Civil Rights Movement, in its truest form, was hundreds of thousands of people organizing events and protests, working together to ensure that every American—whether black, white, brown and anything in between—had the right to a prosperous and harmonious life.
The Supreme Court was important in both suppressing and aiding the Civil Rights Movement. However, decisions taken by the President, the continued white opposition and improvements in media communications also had an effect. Although all were important, the Civil Rights movement alone would have reached the same end without the help of the Supreme Court, and the devotion of its many members and leaders is the major factor in advancing Civil Rights.