Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Usa and federalism
Introduction Every government realizes this phenomenon that without Constitution no country performs its duties effectively and efficiently. US government analyzed that Article of Confederation was not enough to deal with the complex problems of the newly born country. Alexander Hamilton the lawyer from New York called for the meeting to discuss the issues related to Article of Confederation. In meeting after heated discussion consensus was made on the drafting of new Constitution. The delegates of the convention signed the Constitution on September 17, 1787. The new US Constitution made laws for the stronger federal government with three branches Executive, Judiciary and Legislative. Every state has to follow the US Constitution, states also …show more content…
The US Constitution ended the lacuna of Articles of Association and delegate the federal government powers into three branches, legislative, executive and judicial. Originally US Constitution consisted of 7articles and 27 amendments consisted of 4500 words. The three branches were a mean of check on each other. The executive branch consists of President, cabinet and all the related staff of different departments. The Judicial branch consists of Supreme court and other lower courts. The Legislative consist of Senate and House of Representative. The Texas Constitution The Texas Constitution is a heavy document which is amenden put the limits on Parliamentary sessions that create a lot of problems and members have to wait for the session to start. In Texas, on all the important seat elections are conducted and seats are filled through the election, not selection. Government prepares the budget and Texas Constitution gives direction to the government that the budget should be balanced and according to expenses and income of the government. Comparison between US Constitution and Texas Constitution There are few commonalities and differences between US Constitution and Texas Constitution ad is discussed one by …show more content…
The Legislative Branch US Constitution has less check and balances as compared to Texas Constitution and has to follow the rules and regulations that are written in the law. US congress is a specialized legislature that meets annually and is a full time working body. While Texas legislature is non-specialized and a part time legislature. The Judicial Branch Judiciary role in the US is to define the Constitution and the judges of Supreme Court are elected for life. Judiciary comprised of district courts, appealed courts and Supreme Court. All the judges are appointed and not elected. Supreme Court judge is appointed by President and for a lifetime. While Texas Judiciary comprises of six different types of courts and each of them has its own jurisdiction but they are sometimes overlapping and creates confusion. A simple overview of both Constitution is as follows US Constitution Texas Constitution US Constitution has been written and then amended only 27 times Texas Constitution is rewritten 7 times and amended more than 200
The Texas Constitution is a document that describes the structure and purpose of the government in Texas. It took effect in February 15, 1876 and is amongst the longest state constitutions in the United States. It is the sixth constitution since claiming their independence from Mexico in 1836. Texas joined the United States under the Constitution of 1845 with provisions. Those provisions included allowing Texas to enter the union and begin the first U.S. statehood constitution. In 1861 Texas amended to transfer their statehood to the Confederacy. After the Confederacy was defeated Texas was required to adopt a constitution if they wanted to rejoin the union. The 1866 Constitution Convention emerged with a document but it did not last very long.
The Texas constitution of 1876 is made up of 18 sections including the preamble, each section covering a different aspect of governing decisions and how they should be handled including defining what the powers of the government actually are, managing taxes and revenue, public land and titles, and the different departments of the government branches. It is the sixth constitution that has fallen under Texas since independence in 1836. The constitution was thought of by the 1875 Texas constitutional convention and h...
...iminal code, and the Court of Criminal Appeals, both are equal in prominence and decision-making capability. M most positions in the US Government outside of the President and Congress are appointed by the President, confirmed by the Senate. In Texas, only the Governor's and Lt. Governor's aides and some cabinet positions are appointed, all other positions are elected, including that of the State Attorney General, Comptroller of Public Accounts (basically, the State Accountant and Tax Assessor), and Railroad Commissioner (who controls and regulates the state's land and mineral resources).
One of the key differences between the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation is in the way that they set up the Legislature. In the Articles, it is established as a unicameral legislature which it refers to as a Congress. The Constitution on the other hand establishes a bicameral legislature with an upper house, the Senate, and a lower house, the House of Representatives. The reason for this change was because different states wanted the number of representatives to be selected in different ways. Under the Articles of Confederation all States were represented equally and the bigger states felt that they should be getting more say in the decisions that the Country would be making. Needless to say the smaller states did not readily agree to this.
Texas is a unique place with a colorful history of legendary cowboys and tall tales. The state stretches over the middle section of the southern United States. Texas has experienced shifts in governmental control within the United States. French, Spanish, Mexican, and Confederacy, and all having once been in charge, not to mention the time Texas spent as an independent republic. Texas has had many battles and wars within its borders, resulting in seven different constitutions within a span of fifty years between each document.
The Texas Legislature is far too archaic to provide consistent leadership for a state government; Congress has become too enmeshed with the executive branch and leaves blurry lines drawn in its separation of powers. The ideal legislature would be a modernized version of what the Texas Constitution created.
The two documents contain very general similarities. They both have a bicameral legislature, which means that they have two chambers or houses. They also both have a Bill of Rights which showcases the rights that the citizens have. Like the U.S. government, the Californian government also has a legislative, executive, and judicial branch where, in short, the legislative branch makes the laws, the executive branch carries out the laws, and the judicial branch interprets the laws, among other things. In order for both governments to run smoothly, California was influenced by the federal system of checks and balances, meaning that no single branch of government can become too powerful. In addition, the state governor has similar duties to the president such as serving as commander in chief of a militia and having the supreme executive power (Cal. Const. art. V, § 1&7). Although, within the similarities, many differences can be noted between the two documents, ranging from minor differences to major differences.
As a federalist Alexander Hamilton wanted to establish a stronger federal government under a new Constitution. He met in Philadelphia with other delegates to discuss how to fix the Articles of Confederation that created a weak central government. During the meeting, Hamilton expressed his view that a dependable current source of revenue would be crucial to develop a more powerful and resilient central government. Although Hamilton played a diminutive part in the writing of the Constitution itself, he did heavily influence its ratification. In cooperation with James Madison and John Jay, Hamilton wrote fifty one of eighty five essays under the joint title The Federalist “The Federalist Paper.” In the essays, he cunningly explained and defended the newly drafted Constitution prior to its approval. In 1788, at the New York Ratification Convention, two thirds of delegates opposed the Constitution, however Hamilton was a powerful advocate for ratification, effectively arguing against the anti Federalist persuasion. His efforts succeeded when New York agreed to ratify, which led the remaining eight states to follow. He had a proposal for the new government that was modeled on the British system, which Hamilton considered the best.
By 1875 the need to rewrite the Texas Constitution had become very evident, and a Convention was held to rewrite the Constitution. The constitution written then was the fifth that the state has been ruled under, and is the one still in place today. At that point in Texas history, the state was primarily agricultural,
The Constitution bestowed essential powers to the nation, without which, America would crumble. Under this newly created document, three different branches of government were created: the judiciary, the legislative, and the executive. The legislative was composed of Congress, which now had the power to create a military, control interstate and international commerce, and create laws. The Judicial branch was the Supreme Court, which would review the decision of the President (in the executive branch...
The judicial branch in Texas works the same as that of the federal judicial branch and its role is to interpret the laws. The Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is the chief legal and law enforcement officer of the State of Texas. The judicial branch oversees enforcement and making of laws to ensure that they are operating within the framework of the original charters of governmental power. The judicial branch checks the power of both legislative and executive branches by declaring if laws and acts passed are unconstitutional. The Texas judicial branch settles disputes and determines if someone is guilty or innocent when charged with violating the law. It also settles the estates of the deceased. It runs jails and prisons, monitors parolees, and in extreme cases, carries out the death penalty on people convicted of a capital felony. The Texas judiciary department includes five levels of courts. The lower levels are the trial courts, similar to the federal system. Appellate courts hear the appeals of both civil and criminal cases from the lower courts. Unlike the federal system, the top of the Texas judicial hierarchy is divided into two supreme courts, the court of criminal appeals and the Texas Supreme Court for civil
The founding fathers of the American Constitution divided the government up into the following three branches to prevent the majority from ruling with an iron fist; legislative, judicial, and executive. The three braches were created by the Constitution: Article 1, Legislative branch made up of the House and the Senate, collectively known as Congress; Article 2, Executive branch, or President; Article 3, Judicial branch, made up of the federal courts and the Supreme Court. This was done in efforts to distribute power amongst the three so that one would not have more power than the other. Each branch has the ability to check the power of the other branches. This power check of the other branches is referred to as the checks and balances, better known as the Separation of Powers. This was to prevent tyriny.
The Texas Republic was a short lived empire was that had many problems but the main was debt it had a total debt of 12,436,991.34 but in our time it would be much more.The young nation had a rough start with debt in the beginning because of the costly revolution and mexico banning trade but the first president Sam Houston had to start out with 1 million dollars ,but Houston was good a money manager and kept government expense to minimum and tried to increase money for revenue. The government tied to collect money and collect property tax.1837 the Texas Congress confirmed Houston’s issue with Star Money. Most of Texas debt was because of Lamar’s spending he bought costly warships to guard the coast and increased the army spending and he also
In conclusion, both of the constitutions are similar but they have their differences. One focuses on our individual rights while the other on the state. The states have reserved powers and their own governments. In the end, the governments are made to separate power and protect our rights and freedoms. What more could we ask
Constitution, creates a unitary executive whereas the Texas Constitution creates a plural executive government. In the Texas Constitution, the government is plural executive and disperses the power among several elected officials. On the other hand, the U.S. Constitution creates a unitary executive, which concentrates the executive power on a single representative, the president. The president has a right to veto any bill he dislikes, but the Congress is also able to approve a bill if the president refuses to adopt it. In the Texas Constitution, there is a line-veto which allows the governor to veto specific items on the legislature of bills passed. The Texas government is more of a limited government whereas the U.S. constitution grants power to the president. Furthermore, in the U.S. Constitution the legislative branch is responsible for making the laws being very limited in government spending, and in the Texas Constitution there were detailed restrictions on tax and specific policies depending on the states legislatures. Legislatures are not allowed to oppose a tax on personal income and are forbidden to make states government develop into debt. Even though the Constitution was ratified, the anti-federalist adopted the Bill of Rights, which promises basic human rights to citizens. Moreover, 27 amendments are in the U.S. Constitution; nevertheless, the state