US and NC Constitution Comparison In this essay we will discuss about the US Constitution and the Constitution of North Carolina. The US Constitution being the law of our whole nation as stated in the Supremacy Clause (US.6.2.2). The US constitution was created on September 17, 1787. The NC constitution was created in 1776. Overall, I will discuss the similarities and differences of both constitutions. The constitutions have many similarities yet they are still unique. Both of the constitutions have the three branches of separation of power included in them which are the Judicial, Executive and Legislative branches. They have the same rules with them, the legislative can still override the executives veto and leaders can be impeached. The …show more content…
In the US Constitution it states that every state has two Senators (US.1.3.1). In order to be a Senator you must be 30 years of age (US.1.3.3) but in the NC Constitution you only have to be 25 years of age (NC.2.6). In the other house, which is the House of representatives, it states in the US you must be 25 years old (US.1.2.2) while in the NC you must be a qualified voter. When we compare the leaders we know that the president is our country’s leader and the governor is only the governor of the state they reside in. The president can only be president for 2 terms, they negotiate and sign treaties with other countries and live in the White House (US.2.2.2). The governor has to live in the state they govern but they can serve for more than 2 terms if not consecutive. They have different rules in becoming whichever, if someone wants to be president they have to be a natural born citizen, be 35 years old, and 14 years of being a US resident (US.2.1). To become a governor, you must be 30 years or older, a resident of the state for at least 2 years, and a US citizen for 5 years. In conclusion, both of the constitutions are similar but they have their differences. One focuses on our individual rights while the other on the state. The states have reserved powers and their own governments. In the end, the governments are made to separate power and protect our rights and freedoms. What more could we ask
There were many differences between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. At the end of the American Revolution the free states needed some sort of control that would generate to a unified country. Issues arose such as: How should power be divided between local and national governments? How should laws be made, and by whom? Who should be authorized to govern those laws? How could the government be designed to protect the unalienable individual rights? Their first attempt at solving this issue was the Articles of Confederation, which was a failure for the most part, but not completely. After the failure of the articles, the state delegates tried to revise the articles, but instead, constructed the Constitution. There were so many changes made and very little remained the same.
The Articles of Confederation were approved by Congress on November 15, 1777 and ratified by the states on March 1, 1781. It was a modest attempt by a new country to unite itself and form a national government. The Articles set up a Confederation that gave most of the power to the states. Many problems arose and so a new Constitution was written in 1787 in Independence Hall. The new Constitution called for a much more unified government with a lot more power. Let us now examine the changes that were undertaken.
In comparing the Articles of Confederation with the U.S constitution that was produced by the federal convention in 1787, it is important to note that the U.S operated under both documents. During March 1, 1781, the Articles of Confederation went into effect when it was ratified by Maryland. However, the U.S constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation as soon as it was ratified on June 21, 1788 by New Hampshire. The main difference between the Articles of Confederations and the U.S Constitution is that the constitution didn’t force the laws, but established the why of the constitution. In establishing the why, it warranted the farmers to work on the government being better than the Articles of Confederations. They wanted the government
The United States' Constitution is one the most heralded documents in our nation's history. It is also the most copied Constitution in the world. Many nations have taken the ideals and values from our Constitution and instilled them in their own. It is amazing to think that after 200 years, it still holds relevance to our nation's politics and procedures. However, regardless of how important this document is to our government, the operation remains time consuming and ineffective. The U.S. Constitution established an inefficient system that encourages careful deliberation between government factions representing different and sometimes competing interests.
While fixing the issues of the Articles of Confederation, the new constitution also led to fighting between different groups, and making compromises which led to ultimately winning ratification. The US constitution was written with great detail and speculation on the economy. In producing Constitution, it provides the laws and rights of the people of the land and directs its attention to many of the problems this country has. This Constitution was greater at the central government power and was weaker at the state level. Congress was given the power to tax, regulate trade between the states, raise an army, etc. A three-branch government was established in which a judicial branch handled disputes in a federal court system, a President the head of the executive branch, and a legislative
Constitution was the first constitution constructed during the Constitutional Convention and ratified in 1787. This document improved the national government structure through the fundamental laws. The Bill of Rights were implemented to protect basic individual rights, as well as the civil liberties that are implied even though not stated in the Constitution. The Constitution provided separation of powers within the three branches so no branch would have more jurisdiction over the other. These three branches consisted of the legislative which emerged to a bicameral congress, the executive which now be vested in the President, and the judicial which is the Supreme Court where the judges are appointed by the President and approved through Congress. In order to avoid one branch overpowering others, the constitution proposed checks and balances. The Congress is compromised of the Senate and the House of Representatives. After a two year term a member of the representative house must uphold popular vote during elections to take position, and the amount of members is based on the states’ population; whereas after a six year term two new senators appointed by state council to each state take position. During the voting process the senate is granted one vote per representative and senator. In addition, Congress gained the right to levy taxes on individuals which boots the economy to allow Congress access to gather an army and handle issues regarding the
Some similarities between the two documents was that they both stated that no states were allowed to enter any treaty, alliance, or confederation without the consent of Congress, and no state could go into war by itself. Both documents state that the government oversees the value of money, and there will be term limits for the different offices in the government. The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution both say that every state had to observe and obey the law of the
United States Constitution and Hawaii State Constitution has several commonalities and differences. The United States Constitution provides the blueprint on how the federal government along with states should function in a general prospective viewpoint. The Hawaii States Constitution take in consideration form a direct viewpoint on how a state should operator and conduct business from areas such as education, elections, and public health. Both of the documents are structured using articles to organize information. The United States Constitution has VII articles and the Hawaii State Constitution has XVIII articles.
“The Constitution devotes the national domain to union, to justice, to defense, to welfare and to liberty” (Maier 154). This quote, stated by William Henry Seward, displays the strength and stability that the Constitution had over the nation, and the liberty and justice it supplied for all of its citizens. Although the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation have similarities, they have many differences, which proved that the Articles of Confederation were a weaker document in comparison. It can be said that the Articles were the “rough draft” to the final living document, which significantly influenced and “ruled” our government, as it still does today.
While the Articles of Confederation and Constitution have similarities they also have lots of differences. The Articles of Confederation had a very weak Federal government. On the other hand the Constitution had a stronger Federal government. In the Articles of Confederation they did not have an
The Articles of Confederation was the first written constitution of the United States. Many problems however did come up discussing the Articles, the reason why is mainly that each person would fear that one would have more power than the other. Later on the constitution was then ratified on March 1, 1781. The main powers of Congress included: the power to declare war, appoint military officers, sign treaties, make alliances, appoint foreign ambassadors, and manage relations with Indians. Still, Congress did not have the power to levy taxes and regulate trade, which then led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787 for the creation of new federal laws. “Congress felt the need for a stronger union and a government powerful
First of all, there are few similar articles in both of the two constitutions. For example, they have articles that guarantee people’s rights and value. In case of
The biggest similarity the documents have is the cause for the documents to be written. Both were written for the purpose of freedom and equality. Although the documents were written for the same purpose, the declaration of Independence was written to free the United states from Great Britain. The declaration of Independence abolished ties with the crown, while on the other hand, the Declaration of the Rights of Man was written to give rights and equality to the citizens. Both documents grant citizens the right of being free and equal. In the Declaration of Independence, this was stated when said, “all men are created equal.”(Using APA, 1776, para. 2, Declaration of Independence) Although in the Declaration of the rights of man, freedom and equality is stated differently as the document said “men are born free and remain equal in rights.”(Using APA, 1789, Art. 1, DRMC) The Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of the Rights of man, are two very similar, as well as very different
The Georgia Constitution and U.S Constitution are both similar in significance but organized slightly different from one another. The articles of both exist to establish the general framework of government at the state and national level. The U.S. Constitution is comprised of seven articles and the Georgia Constitution has 11. In comparing the articles of both, each embodies the doctrine of separation of powers by establishing guidelines for the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. Articles I, II, and III of the U.S. Constitution delineate the role of each governing body creating a system of checks and balances to ensure that one branch is not more powerful than the other. Unlike the U.S. Constitution, Article I of the
Key differences between the two systems include the extent to which the powers of government are separated functionally between branches of government, how each system defines the conditions for removing the executive and dissolving the government, and the influence that the governing system has on the structures developed by the parties in the legislature.