Ted Talk Summary Essay

1150 Words3 Pages

Addiction is a word that, despite being used on a daily basis, is misconstrued by the public. Johann Hari addresses this issue in a Ted Talk he calls, “Everything we know about addiction is wrong,” which he performed to the public in 2015. Merely based upon the title of the Ted Talk, it was evident Hari’s intention was to raise awareness on the subject of addiction. The crowd was more apt to be open-minded to the argument, considering the fact that they paid to attend the Ted Talk, and as a result of this, Hari did not fail in achieving the proper audience. Hari argued that addiction isn’t all as it seems, and thus went about the Talk explaining how, if we went about treating addiction and addicts differently, the number of recovering addicts would increase. Hari began his argument strongly by providing the audience with …show more content…

Bringing statistical evidence to an argument is an effective form of persuasion as it gives the audience explicit reasoning for the supported claim. Hari, for the most part, uses inductive reasoning to create his logical appeal, and he begins this form of logos by providing the audience with various premises leading to a definitive conclusion: that environment contributes to the need for drug usage. An allusion was made to the heroin usage in the Vietnam war and how 95% of previous heroin users were able to quit using once the war ended, or, in other words, once their environment was altered. This same conclusion is reached when Hari talks of the ‘Rat Park’ study, the Dr. Joao Goulao panel in Portugal, Bill McKibben’s study on connections between people, etc. Each piece of statistical evidence Hari fed the audience was related to the next in regard to the claim. Hari’s method of inductive reasoning stands as the building blocks to the logos appeal and ultimately strengthens the overall

Open Document