Sweet Land Of Conformity Analysis

513 Words2 Pages

Claude Fischer the author of Sweet Land of Conformity erroneously makes the claim that, “Our culture consists that if you marry… you are signing an explicit or implicit contract to cooperate and conform.” We feel that as Americans, people tend to stray from this ideal; this is portrayed through divorce and infidelity. In today’s corrupt society, when you marry, you are expected to be loyal based on an, “explicit or implicit contract.” But as time goes by and people become less interested and involved with their partners, we see that this claim is not true. The twisted love triangle that occurred between Angelina Jolie, Jennifer Aniston, and Brad Pitt in 2005 demonstrates an example of infidelity which led to divorce. While Brad Pitt was married …show more content…

The infidelity shown in Brad Pitt’s marriage is just one example of how American’s do not follow the rules of marriage. According to the American Psychological Association, the divorce rate in 2016 is about 40 to 50%, and is increasing more and more each day. Divorces clearly go against the contract that you sign in order to “to cooperate and conform,” which makes the claim by Fischer stand false. Another example of infidelity is shown between Abigail Williams and John Proctor in the play “The Crucible.” John Proctor is supposed to be a Puritan man, but at the same time he is being unfaithful to his wife. Not only do his actions go against the “contract” and promises made in marriage, but also Proctor no longer carries the name of a pure man who has integrity. In both of these situations, Brad and John, we see how one man’s desires for another makes him go against his morals which prove Fischer’s claim wrong. Even though Fischer’s claim is flawed, some people believe that it is true. People have this opinion because they do in fact believe that American’s follow the promises and commitments they make in their

Open Document