For several years many have determined whether or not college athletes should be paid. There are two sides of the equation and a lot of supportive evidence to support both arguments. My personal opinion is that college athletes should be paid. College athletes should be paid by the NCAA because some of them need extra money to pay off college expenses and injuries, academics, and training and hard work. First and foremost, college athletes could use money to pay off college expenses and injuries. The student athletes have two main jobs when in college one do good in your sport two get good grades. Since these tasks are the college athletes main job they have no spare time to get a job that actually pays money. Secondly, the NCAA admits that a full scholarship does not cover the basic necessities for college athletes (NCPA.) Though they admit to this, they do nothing to change it. The scholarship will not pay for the food or supplies that the athletes need to use. (NCPA.) Finally, no scholarship will pay for an injury an athlete may attain during the season. The athletes have to use their small amount of money they have saved up to pay for …show more content…
There happen to be many supporters for athletes to get a better education. The NBA makes it so basketball players can not go from high school to the NBA (Palaima.) This makes it so the athletes have to get some sort of education before declaring to be drafted. However, many big time college athletes struggle in academics. They are more focused on training hard to get more playing time the next season (Palaima.) Although some athletes are good in school and not like this. One possibility for the athletes is for the athletes to get tutors. This will help them succeed and be able to play sports at the same time. Some people blame low grades on the college because the colleges want their athletes to succeed in sports over academics
Critics feel that the term amateurism is only a term used in collegiate sports to show the distinguish the difference between professional and collegiate so that they don’t have to pay college athletes. College athletes are just as talented and just as exposed as professional athletes. The argument is for there to be a share in the profits for wage compensation amongst players is know as pay-for-play. College athletics is a corporate enterprise that is worth millions of dollars in revenue. Pay-for-play is an assumption that colleges and universities receive huge revenues from marketing their collegiate sports programs and that the profits from these revenues are not shared with players who perform in the arena. Which some feel that they should.
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote regards a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid for playing for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
In summary college athletes should be paid because they are too busy to have a job, the NCAA has enough money and they can put in salary caps so everybody get paid
Nowadays, we've seen many universities’ competitions on the television as a leisure performance but we've never concerned whether they receive their pay. In Mike Benedykciuk's article "The Blue Line: College Athletes Should be Paid," he argues that student athletes should receive the wage though they are not professional. Like any good writer, he employs special word choices, statistics and rhetorical devices to plead with the audience to take his side. In this article, he demonstrates many such devices, which will be explained further as follows.
Should college athletes receive pay for what they do? You’ve probably seen this pop-up a million times, and thought about it. You’ve probably figured why should they? Aren’t they already receiving benefits from a full-ride scholarship? But then an athlete will get caught up in a scandal like Johnny Manziel, where he signed footballs for money.. then you think well why shouldn’t he receive that money? And you then contradict yourself. But shouldn’t they receive money from outside sources, and then the benefits from the school. Not get a salary from the school just the benefits they’re already receiving, and money from sponsors. Wouldn’t that make sense considering the money they’re making the school? According to an ESPN report Alabama University makes $123,769,841 in total revenue from sports. (College Athletics Revenue) Yes ONE HUNDRED & TWENTY THREE MILLION. Yet an athlete from Alabama can only receive benefits from a scholarship.. That doesn’t seem right. You would want to be payed when the opportunity arises. It should only be fair these players get a piece of the revenue pie, after all they are the ones creating the revenue. The players should be getting benefits to allow them to pay for basic college needs, grow up to be responsible adults, and allow the NCAA to thrive. This would allow for the NCAA to truly thrive as a sporting association.
College athletes should be paid because of the huge amount of money being made off of the use of their athletic ability. The college basketball and football games that everyone watches on TV is no longer just a game, it is a business. The colleges and arenas hosting such events are not doing it solely for the love of sport, they are doing it for the money that will flow generously into their banking accounts. The coaches also, they are not volunteers, they are not there just for their love of the game, coaching is their job. The athletic directors, coaching staff, and event staff are all doing their job to put food on the table. The fans are watching the game, the players, the ones who are making huge sacrifices to be on the court. The athletes are the only ones in this circle of business who are putting in the hours, maybe even the most hours, and not getting a paycheck. It is time for a change, the fans, the players, and the NCAA is ready for it, it just has to be done. However, there are those out there fighting the other side of this battle, saying there is no need for these student athletes to be paid. Both sides have good points but one of them has great points.
With the way the NCAA has blown up into a billion dollar industry, does it seem plausible for an academic institution to make this amount of money off of amateur athletes and not provide some other type of revenue besides scholarships? This has been at the forefront of debate as the NCAA continues to make billions off of these so called amateur athletes. The NCAA believes that if compensation is given to student-athletes, the amateurism of the game is taken away. However, many student-athletes believe they should get a piece of the revenue that is being generated off of their name and talents. College athletes should in fact be compensated because the NCAA generates enough revenue to provide the money, it could help students pay for all the
College athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.
In today’s society, one of the big controversies with sports is, should student athletes be be paid a salary? Some people believe that they should be paid and others would completely disagree. Even though they technically are being paid, they really are not. The only type of way the athletes would be paid is through financial aid or if they have a job. Only their education is being paid by the school. Although some people believe that they should be paid, it would not be a good idea at all. So college athletes should not be paid at all because they are basically being paid to study and play a sport.
College athletes should be paid! College athletes are often considered to be some of the luckiest students in the world. Most of them receiving all inclusive scholarships that cover all the costs of their education. They are also in a position to make a reputation for themselves in the sporting world preparing them for the next step. The ongoing debate whether student athletes should be paid has been going on for years. These athletes bring in millions of dollars for their respective schools and receive zero in return. Many will argue that they do receive payment, but in reality it is just not true. Costs associated with getting a college education will be discussed, information pertaining to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and benefits student athletes receive. First, I’ll start with costs associated with college and most of all why student athletes should be paid!
College athletes should not be paid it will ruin college sports forever. Some people believe that college athletes should be paid by the school because of all of the hard work they put in however they shouldn’t be paid because there is no fair way to pay every college athlete. There are many reasons that college athletes shouldn’t be paid one of the main reasons is that colleges don’t have enough money, the second reason is that they already get money in the form of scholarships, and there is no fair way to pay each college athlete.
Every college athlete has the dream of playing professional so they can play the game they love longer and mostly for the money. If these student athletes were paid they wouldn’t have to try leaving for the drafts for the money because they would already be getting paid. Which 71% of athletes in college leave college in debt.(1) Which is why some don’t to stay in school longer because they do not want to leave school having to owe money. However. if these athletes were paid it would allow them to leave education with a little bit of money to help them buy time.(5) The NCAA rules that no athlete is allowed a job in-season, so how are these kids supposed to get money? The majority of athletes in college come from poverty and are playing sports and trying to provide for their family. How are they supposed to provide for their families if they aren’t allowed a job in a season that could last half a year. This is the reason some of these kids are forced to drop out, so they can help their families with financial problems.This would take a lot of stress off of these athletes. (5) Taking the stress off of them would let me them enjoy and want to continue college. Paying them will give them an incentive to want to stay in school and pursue their education. This bonus with help give these athletes a desire to want to stay in
On the issue of college athletes getting paid, I believe they should. When I mean getting paid I only mean a stipend or weekly check, not thousands or millions. All the hard work and dedication they put into their sport and academics are worthy enough. I have had a chance to play collegiate sports and it takes a lot out of you mentally and physically. The student athletes deserve at least enough money to have a normal student life. $300-$400 a month should give athletes enough money to get the required necessities. All this does is replace the notion of the athlete getting a job for a source of income. This will also help reduce the rate at which athletes accept money, cars, and gifts from boosters. When athletes get caught accepting something from a booster it looks bad on the athlete and the college. So, in my opinion yes college athletes should get paid, there is too much money that the universities have earned floating around going unanswered for the athletes not to get their cut.
One major topic of controversy in today’s society is whether or not the NCAA should allow college athletes to get paid. As of right now, the closest thing to payment athletes can receive for playing sports is an athletic scholarship. Although some people believe that an athletic scholarship is enough compensation for college athletes, the NCAA should start allowing colleges to pay athletes for playing sports at their school because it would help control the salaries of college coaches, athletics are a major source of revenue for schools, and it could help keep athletes on the right track.
College athletes should be paid so that way the athlete can have some money to get around, and buy things. I know this because the college athlete travels a lot and they need some money to get things that they need. The athlete just needs enough money for important things, they don’t need as much money as a pro athlete. If a college athlete does not get paid then they would not be able to buy things like shampoo, and other important things. That is why college athletes should be paid.