Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The boston tea party, summary of event
Essay news about boston tea party
Boston tea party analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Sons of Liberty was a group of men fighting for their independence. They were fighting before the continental congress or the beginning of the Revolutionary War. They were called out as being disobedient. They were believed to be political radicals at the time; doing what they felt was right for their town and their colonies. The Sons of Liberty were everyday men that expanded from New England all the way down the thirteen colonies. However, the high activity political gang started to appear with aggressiveness in Boston, Massachusetts. This paper will demonstrate the origins of the Sons of Liberty in Boston, their manifest, leading actions, and development within their first year.
Taxes had been rising for the colonies for years prior 1765. It was not appreciated but the colonists tolerated it. Those tax acts included the Townshend Act. That is, until the spring of 1765 when British Parliament passed the Stamp Act. The Stamp Act required a tax to be put on all paper goods. This included all ship papers, legal documents, licenses, and newspapers. It was considered a small tax in cost but the reaction of the colonist was nothing but offended. All the things that the colonist used to develop and have their daily lives separate from British government was now being taxed. Although the act was not passed until November of 1765, the colonists already felt victimized by the Stamp Act and the discrimination from Great Britain. These emotions and reactions quickly followed as motivation to do something again the act. The same can be said for how the Sons of Liberty was started.
Boston was the largest harbors during the colonial era. Products going to and from Britain were rotating out of Boston daily. When word reached Boston of the...
... middle of paper ...
...ated/sons.htm.
Kreamer, Todd Alan. “Sons of Liberty: Patriots or Terrorists?” Archiving Early America.
Fall 1996. Accessed April 3, 2014. http://www.earlyamerica.com/review
/fall96/sons.html.
“Loyal Nine.” Boston Tea Party Ships and Museum. April 12, 2014. Accessed April 12,
2014. http://www.bostonteapartyship.com/loyal-nine.
Ramsbey, Thomas W. “The Sons of Liberty: The Early Inter-Colonial Organization.”
International Review of Modern Sociology 17, no. 2 (Autumn 1987): 313-35.
Accessed April 3, 2014. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41420902.
Rozbicki, Michal Jan. Culture and Liberty in the Age of the American Revolution.
Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 2011. Accessed April 3, 2014. http://muse.jhu.edu/. “Sons of Liberty and Stamp Men.” Boston Tea Party Ships and Museum. Accessed April
3, 2014. http://www.bostonteapartyship.com/sons-of-liberty.
Nash’s argument regarding to how the American Revolution portrayed “radicalism” throughout the American Revolution has been supported from the previous pieces of evidence. Moreover, the pieces of evidence listed to support Gary B. Nash’s argument are supported in embodying the true manner on how the American colonists fought to let go of their submission with the British and try to throw down Parliaments Policies. The evidence presented illustrate how the radical-lower class politics erupted to other citizens that favored British policies and caused riots that led to the account for the Revolution itself. The issues regarding to how these radical-lower class demanded British favorites demonstrated how far reaching the people would go to demolish but historically demonstrate their pride and purpose in freeing themselves from Parliament rule. These evidential claims help proclaim what argument Nash is making suggesting that radicalism was performed indeed to a very extreme point but rather to an effective point in which led to the creation of the American
It’s 1763 and the seven years’ war, quoted by Winston Churchill as “the First World War”, has ended. “Due to the costly war Great Britain’s national debt doubled from £75,000,000 to £133,000,000”(Tax History Project). To pay off their debt Britain turned to the American colonies to pay taxes. The tax acts included the Sugar Act (1764), Stamp Act (1765), Quartering Act (1765), and the Townshend Act (1767). Although angry because of the many taxes placed upon them, the colonists were especially upset with taxation without representation. While colonists were obliged to pay the taxes, they didn’t have any elected officials representing them in the British Parliament. Throughout the next decade patriotism and unity will drive events that’ll increase the drive for independence from Great Britain.
In the 1770’s the American colonists were being taxed too much by the British and they started to want their independence. Britain was taxing the colonists to pay their debts from the French and Indian War. The colonists started to fight back by tarring and feathering some tax collectors. Britain sent troops to the colonies which caused more problems.
The Sons of Liberty were major fanatics and didn’t help America! They rebelled too many times and were really outrageous and crazy. They hurt America more than they helped. I believe that the Sons of Liberty were fanatics and not heroes. They loved to hurt people and violence to people and their property. The Sons of Liberty did illegal things and hated taxes.
Henretta, James A and David* Brody. America: A concise History . Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2010. Document.
This outraged the colonists because part of the rights they held to be irrevocable was that they could not be deprived of their property unwillingly. And also they could not be deprived of liberty. The colonists genuinely considered the taxation by the crown to be theft, in no uncertain terms. One can be quite sure that there were, of course, exceptions to this generalization, but as a whole Americans were not happy. To ensure that the massive war debts could be paid, the taxes were raised several times until it was necessary to send soldiers to start enforcing the taxation. These soldiers were unwelcome visitors that caused the colonists to be infuriated and gradually the murmuring of the people against the crown became an audible groan of a country struggling to rise into the ranks of legitimacy as a self-governing, established, power. “Growing pains” if you will. These taxes grew increasingly harsh starting with the sugar tax and then continuing on with the stamp act, the Townshend Acts, the tea act, and eventually culminating in the intolerable acts. So named because after the colonists threw what was basically a massive temper tantrum, Great Britain put the colonists in the proverbial
Most people have heard of The Boston tea party. When American patriots dressed as Mohawk Indians boarded the British ships in the Boston harbor and dumped all of the tea into the ocean. But what most people fail to realize is the great importance behind this protest. To fully understand a topic of history one must first acknowledge the actions behind it. The French and Indian war, the Stamp Act, the Townshend Revenue Act, as well as the Tea Act are all important catalysts of the legendary Boston tea party. Which is why we will discuss these topics before examining the events of the Boston tea party.
The most fundamental reason for the American Revolution was the colonist’s outrage over taxation which led to a tax revolt launched by people who were tired of the burden of paying unfair taxes. The king placed taxes known as Townsend Acts, on the colonist’s tea, paper, paint, lead, glass, and many other items that were used daily and the colonists were against this taxing. The purpose of the Townsend Acts was to help pay the cost of government in America. Lawyer James Otis and other colonist rebels referred to King George as a tyrant. As stated by James Otis in The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved (1763), . . . “The very act of taxing exercised over those who are not represented appears to me to be depriving them of one of their most essential rights as freemen, and if continued seems to be in effect and entire
The Sons of Liberty were a colonial protest group created by a man named Samuel Adams, in Boston, Massachusetts. The group had a motto “No taxation without Representation”. They operated in secrecy and usually under the cover of darkness. The only existed to create a spark of rebellion in the many
“The Sons of Liberty were initially formed in reaction to the Stamp Act, and during its height of activity during 1765- 1776 the group became an embodiment of the revolutionary movement and fed the development of a national identity”(McKee). While many of their resistance weren’t as extreme as the Boston Tea Party, they utilized intimidation, mob violence, and propaganda to attack their targets which were often representatives of the Crown. “In addition to beatings and the use of tar and feathers, the Sons of Liberty were known to intimidate agents of the ministry by leading an angry and excited mob to their doorstep. It was not uncommon for the Sons of Liberty to ‘surround the houses of the royal Customs Commissioners at night, beating drums, blowing horns and uttering bloodcurdling Indian war whoops”(Wood). Of course, history will remember them most for their Boston Tea
Before America had any Founding Fathers, the country needed Sons of Liberty to stand up to the British government. These men protested and helped repeal the Parliament's Stamp Act of 1765, which imposed an internal tax on the colonies. Even though the Stamp Act was repealed, the fighting over "taxation without representation" wouldn't go away, resulting in events like the Boston Massacre and the Boston Tea Party. The reason so many of the events took place in Boston, Massachusetts was because that was where the ‘base’ of the Sons of Liberty was at. It was where they made all important decisions an where the Committee of Correspondence was located. Some of the most famous men in the Sons of Liberty, were the men who made up the Committee of
The sons of liberty may have believed in liberty and democracy, but they were no saint.
The Sons of liberty were one of the major contributors of America’s independence. A small group of young nine men comprised mainly of merchants and artisans on the evening of December 16 1765, met at Chase & Speakman’s distillery to compose a letter to Andrew Oliver demanding that he show up the next day under the liberty tree and publicly resign from office. Andrew Oliver was the Massachusetts stamp officer. The letter promised him that as long as he adhered to the requirements written, they would treat him well and with utmost politeness. This marked the beginning of revolution for America. The men who often called themselves the ‘Sons of liberty’ mobilized many people against the British rule. It is because of their commitment
So the government decided to place taxes in. The Stamp Act was taxes, the Stamp Act it states, “Right and Power to lay Taxes and Impositions upon the inhabitants of this Colony.” It was hard for the merchant to trade because they had to pay taxes to people. In Zinn it said that merchants helped start a protest against the stamp act, “A political group in Boston called the Loyal Nine-merchants, distillers, shipowners, and master craftsmen who opposed the Stamp Act-organized a procession in August 1765 to protest it.” This shows that they didn’t like being tax. In “We are equally Free,” in said “Two years earlier, some merchants had organized boycotts against certain products imported from Great Britain (a strategy known as nonimportation) to resist British taxation measures aimed at the rebellious Americans.” As shown by this tried to protest
The Sons of Liberty protested against British taxes and laws before the American Revolution. According to Ducksters.com “The name (Sons of Liberty)comes from a speech made in the British Parliament by Irishman Isaac Barre. He referred to the American colonists as