Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of Chaucer's general prologue
Analysis of Chaucer's general prologue
Characters in Geoffrey Chaucer's General Prologue
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of Chaucer's general prologue
As we read and experience any literature we tend to favor or identify better with certain characters better than others. In the telling of a story, in a film, a novel, we pick individuals who are depicted in the text and see them in a different light than the other characters. Chaucer’s General Prologue gives us a prim opportunity to select characters we prefer because of the vast amount he places before us. In the story the group is on a pilgrimage to Canterbury and the characters will each take a turn to tell a story that will present a certain moral. While reading this text three individuals easily stand out in a way separate from the others, they are those who do not seek the worldly things this their life could offer them, they are the Prioress, the Oxford Cleric, and the Parson. Each of these characters see themselves as being able to offer more to the world and they understand that there are more important things in this life then personal gain, they represent kindness, knowledge, and religion and live their lives in such a way that they are seeking for those virtues and not for material things.
The Prioress is the first character introduced in the Prologue who will be searching to better others and not just herself. Many people wish it was in their nature to be kind and to be sensitive but it is not a trait most are born with, it takes work and constant practice. The Prioress, in the sense of kindness and charity, is the type of person we often which we could be. “And to seem dignified in all her dealings. As for her sympathies and tender feelings, she was so charitably solicitous she used to weep if she but saw a mouse caught in a trap, if it were dead or bleeding. And she had little dogs she would be feeding with ro...
... middle of paper ...
... given, once we learn these we will begin to evaluate the character and decide our opinion of them. Chaucer’s General Prologue offers a great opportunity for us to critique so many different forms of the human being. The Prioress, Oxford Cleric, and the Parson all express traits that are much better then those of the other individuals, they represent things that many people do not see as very important yet to those who really wish to be good people they are the most important. The traits of kindness, knowledge, and religion each find a way to be expressed in Chaucer’s General Prologue and if we look closely we will identify how important those qualities are. It is interesting to study different works or literature to to see the type of characters each of us tend to gravitate toward, whether those characters are similar to ourselves or the people we wish we could be.
Chaucer, Geoffrey. “The Canterbury tales: The Prologue”. Our Literary Heritage. Ed. Desmond Pacey. 4th ed. Montreal, Que.: Mcgraw-Hill Ryerson ltd., 1982.
To see the entire criticism of the Prioress’s tale, the General Prologue must first be recounted. The Prioress was described as a very correct lady; all of her actions showed a very refined lady. She was also portrayed as being very sympathetic, “She wolde wepe, if that she saugh a mous kaught in a trappe, if it were deed or bledde.” (lines 144-146) She was sentimental enough to feed animals the best food she had. Thus, the Prioress was presented as a very compassionate, well-mannered lady.
In Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, Chaucer the author and Chaucer the pilgrim are both quick to make distinctions between characters and point out shortcomings. Though Chaucer the pilgrim is meeting the group for the first time, his characterizations go beyond simple physical descriptions. Using just twenty-one lines in the General Prologue, the author presents the character of the Miller and offers descriptions that foreshadow the sardonic tone of his tale and the mischievous nature of his protagonist.
The first of these devices, his straightforwardness and matter-of-factness regarding the Pardoner’s hypocrisy, is used first to appall his readers, and then to cause them to take a second look at the church in their own society. Chaucer knew that most of his audience lacked the ability to fully understand his views, but he hoped that by using this device he could plant seeds of reason in them that would lead to reform of corruption he saw among church officials like the pardoners.
The Canterbury Tales examines many important qualities of human nature. Chaucer purposely mocks the faults in his characters, and shows the hypocrisy and deceitfulness ...
...s a dictionary of 14th century English peopleIn this majestic piece of Literature, Chaucer uses physiognomy and striating to express his suggestion, dislike and admiration to the Church. He thinks Church has been polluted by people’s own greed and lost its original faith. He doesn’t like the Churchmen because they are nothing like their spiritual leader Jesus and don’t practice their religion in life. But he admires how people are well-educated in Church though these educations don’t do much in building of their moral standards. Today, more people think that indeed Canterbury Tale is a historical critique against the society during Chaucer’s time. But no matter how people define it, its sparkling dialogue, acute rendering of characters, warm humor and sympathetic understanding of Church, society and human nature will always shine in the universe of literature.
Chaucer, in his female pilgrimage thought of women as having an evil-like quality that they always tempt and take from men. They were depicted as untrustworthy, selfish and vain and often like caricatures not like real people at all. Through the faults of both men and women, Chaucer showed what is right and wrong and how one should live. Under the surface, however, lies a jaded look of women in the form that in his writings he seems to crate them as caricatures and show how they cause the downfall of men by sometimes appealing to their desires and other times their fears. Chaucer obviously had very opinionated views of the manners and behaviours of women and expressed it strongly in The Canterbury Tales. In his collection of tales, he portrayed two extremes in his prospect of women. The Wife of Bath represented the extravagant and lusty woman where as the Prioress represented the admirable and devoted followers of church. Chaucer delineated the two characters contrastingly in their appearances, general manners, education and most evidently in their behaviour towards men. Yet, in the midst of disparities, both tales left its readers with an unsolved enigma.
What makes Chaucer’s characters so unique and unforgettable is that he cast them outside of these roles. Bordering on the controversial but lightened by his use of humor, his characters...
Chaucer identifies a pardoner as his main character for the story and utilizes the situational and verbal irony found in the pardoner’s interactions and deplorable personality to demonstrate his belief in the corruption of the Roman Catholic Church during this time. Chaucer first begins his sly jab at the Church’s motives through the description of the Pardoner’s physical appearance and attitude in his “Canterbury Tales.” Chaucer uses the Pardoner as a representation of the Church as a whole, and by describing the Pardoner and his defects, is able to show what he thinks of the Roman Catholic Church. All people present in the “Canterbury Tales” must tell a tale as a part of a story-telling contest, and the pilgrim Chaucer, the character in the story Chaucer uses to portray himself, writes down the tales as they are told, as well as the story teller. The description of the Pardoner hints at the relationship and similarity between the Pardoner and the Church as a whole, as well as marks the beginning of the irony to be observed throughout the “Pardoner’s Prologue and Tale.”
An interesting aspect of the famous literary work, "The Canterbury Tales," is the contrast of realistic and exaggerated qualities that Chaucer entitles to each of his characters. When viewed more closely, one can determine whether each of the characters is convincing or questionable based on their personalities. This essay will analyze the characteristics and personalities of the Knight, Squire, Monk, Plowman, Miller, and Parson of Chaucer's tale.
Chaucer used controversies to create character. He wanted his characters to teach the readers something new about life. The Wife of Bath and the Pardoner demonstrate Chaucer’s way of creating characters based on the sexuality of the medieval period.
The Canterbury Tales is an in-depth narrative analysis of twenty-nine unique characters and their Host on a collective pilgrimage to Thomas Becket’s shrine in Canterbury. Chaucer paints vivid pictures of each pilgrim through his description of their physical appearance, inner nature, and outward behavior towards others. The individuals are not given names but the reader can identify them by their titles. One of the clearest cut characters in this work is the Parson. Chaucer presents the Parson in The Canterbury Tales to create a stark contrast for the other religious figures by his description of the Parson’s inner constitution, outward actions, and shepherd like qualities.
Chaucer decides to take some interesting Pilgrims on his pilgrimage to Canterbury The Canterbury Tales: The Prologue. Some of these people include the Monk, Friar, Summoner, Parson, and the Pardoner. These are just a few of the characters selected to go on the journey to Canterbury. All of the characters have different roles, physical traits, personalities, and classes. At times these different traits bring controversy and some interesting conversation. Today, some people to include in Chaucer’s pilgrimage to Canterbury would be a reality television star, an NFL player, and a high school teacher.
Many of Chaucer’s pilgrims represent a kind of duality. The Pardoner gives a sermon while admitting he is one held captive by his sin. The Miller, of one of the lowest classes depicted of the pilgrims, tells a tale directly preceding the Knight’s tale of noble valor. Many others, still, tell tales that do not necessarily contradict their prologues, but rather round out their characters. The Wife of Bath is no different.
we see how Chaucer the pilgrim has been swayed and convinced by what the other pilgrims tell him. So much so that he reports qualities that are often the opposite of the true personalities of the characters he is describing. This ambiguity reveals a very clever sort of irony on behalf of the writer - while Chaucer the pilgrim is easily drawn in by their deliberate misrepresentations, it is up to the readers to see how wrong he is and draw their own, more accurate, conclusions. It shows many of the pilgrims to be very different people than those symbolised by the ideal qualities they want others to see.