Sleep Deprivation Torture

1110 Words3 Pages

According to Crary, work (essentially ‘being set to work’) leads to a more docile, controlled form of life because our social reconstruction puts us in a position that could only be described as eager submission to the corporate cycle¬–essentially transforming us into drones. The 21st century now operates 24/7 around the clock, pushing us to constant activity and crumbling the binds of community, essentially damaging the basis of everyday life.
Society’s demand for our time essentially shapes our schedule, which in turn shapes our values. We willingly participate in producing profits for corporations by making media consumption part of our everyday lives. Our output as individuals is dependent on our consumption of material from smartphones …show more content…

Crary states “the denial of sleep is the violent dispossession of self by external force, the calculated shattering of an individual”. Studies also show that “rats will die after two to three weeks of sleeplessness”, clearly illustrating how dangerous and wrong depriving an individual of sleep truly is, yet “numerous opinion polls show that a majority of Americans approve of [sleep deprivation] torture” and “mainstream media discussions consistently reject the assertion that sleep deprivation is torture, rather, it is considered “psychological persuasion”. The use of sleep deprivation torture in Guantanamo, and the fact that this form was authorized by the pentagon brings gives is concerning when thinking about ethical values regarding basic human …show more content…

Crary writes, “just as universal access to clean drinking water has been programmatically devastated around the globe by pollution and privatization, with the accompanying monetization of bottled water, it is not difficult to see a similar construction of scarcity in relation to sleep.” Sleep is essentially put on the back burner when outlining values for conventional life. This can clearly be seen by the statistics of rapidly increasing use/sales of hypnotics, for example, “in 2010 around 50 million Americans were prescribed compounds like Ambien or Lunesta, and many millions more bought over-the-counter sleep products”. It’s hard to believe that use of these products would allow people to experience the same benefits of an actual good night’s rest. It’s concerning to think of our increasing dependence on drugs like hypnotics and amphetamines to simply get though the week. Essentially we are BUYING our sleep, and BUYING our time awake, how is this ethical when concerning basic human rights? It’s concerning to think how well we actually function as humans considering this drug use. Crary states, “to believe that there are any essential features to distinguish human beings from machines is, we are told by critics, naive and delusional” (14), which calls to mind the question, at what point does this take away from our

Open Document