More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about athletes getting scholarships for college sports
Essay about athletes getting scholarships for college sports
Essay on athletic scholarship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the text, Sis! Boom! Bah! Humbug!, the argument of whether or not cheerleading should be a sport and giving them scholarships is presented. One example of this argument is when a buddy of Rick Reilly’s twin daughters both get hurt because of a simple human pyramid. As stated in the text, “A buddy of mine has twin daughters, both cheerleaders. At the end of last school year one needed plastic surgery on her cheek after another girl's teeth went through it during a pyramid collapse; the other broke her hand and finger. They're not cheering anymore.” (Reilly) Another example of where the argument is present in the text is when they make a good point about giving the cheerleaders scholarships. In the text it states, “Do you realize colleges are even giving cheerleading scholarships? Can you believe that? Sorry, Mrs. Roosevelt, we just gave away your daughter's chemistry scholarship.” (Reilly) A third example of where the argument exists in the text is when Rick Reilly states his opinion about cheerleading as evidenced by, “ If cheerleading is a sport, Richard Simmons is a ballerina. It's athletic, but it's not a sport. In fact, what's sad is that most cheerleaders would make fine athletes. Watch for five minutes and you'll see.
An article that uses a lot of rhetorical devices is Shitty First Drafts by Anne Lamott. The speaker of this article is obviously Anne Lamott; the reader gets to understand her more after she shares some personal experiences. Lamott wants people to know that their first drafts are supposed to be shitty. This article is meant for college students who just finished their first draft and is looking for improvement. The purpose of this whole article is to inform you that your first draft is supposed to be horrible because no one can just pull an amazing paper from no where, not even the people who write for a living. The whole subject is telling you that your first drafts are going to be bad, so make sure to write multiple drafts before you
A way in which authors can make their piece seem more reliable is by quoting others. It is not enough to just use quotes, but rather frame them as well. This fully extracts a quotes potential, and therefore can be used to benefit the thesis. To frame a quote, it needs to be introduced, quoted, and it’s meaning explained in further detail. In Nestle 's essay “The Supermarket: Prime Real Estate”, she uses quotes to introduce her argument, that the supermarket setup can be used to your disadvantage stating, “the game is to maximize sales and profit consistent with customer convenience” (498). She furthers this saying that supermarkets are set up in order to have the customer see the maximum amount of products without upsetting them. The quote is introduced so that we can tell it is a basic marketing tactic and explained by saying its purpose, to show you the maximum amount of products. This “quotation sandwich” is a sophisticated technique that helps the reader to know the quotation is reliable and that it makes sense with the topics being talked about (Graff and Birkinstein 46). Nestle makes it known to her reader why your freedom of choice is taken away in the supermarket by adding and framing this quote about the setup of the grocery
There are many ways to make an argument, and these are not limited to only magazine articles or conversations with others. A widely used form of argument is visual images which can be used from product ads to political campaigns. The benefit of using a visual argument to persuade an audience is the powerful statements that can come from images. This can be seen in the persuasive add made by the Ray Ban company for its classic styles of its self-claimed high end sunglasses. The overall intention of this add may to be the eventual sales of more classic sunglasses, but looking deeper into this visual aid it’s possible to see the argument the company is making. To better understand this visual argument the message, creator of the message, and
The hard, logical proof used to persuade is called logos. Authors use this technique to support their propositional statements in an argument. By supporting an opinion with a sufficient amount of data, an audience is able to find the argument believable. Logos, however, goes beyond the abundance of information geared toward swaying an opinion into agreement. Presenting facts also includes decisions such as which ...
Everyone knows that the way information is presented is important in any argument, written or spoken. Therefore, you want to make sure that you use techniques to further inspire a reader to join your side, while also remaining true to the facts. In his article “Terri Schiavo — A Tragedy Compounded,” Timothy E. Quill does exactly that. It’s clear from the beginning that Quill thinks the outcome of the case, where Terri Schiavo’s family and husband ended up in a legal battle that kept her life sustained for 15 years, was wrong. Quill uses stylistic choices to provoke reader’s emotions and provide a sense of neutrality to persuade readers to agree with him.
Movies portray cheerleaders as the popular girls that everyone likes and aspires to be. But when reality hits at Salem High School, it’s a completely different story. Cheerleading was taken as a joke by the other athletes and even students. It was considered a hobby, but to me it was a passion and something I worked hard to be. Being on the cheer squad in high school was difficult to deal with in school because we were constantly being snubbed by the other athletes and students in our school ever since we were kids in junior high which should not happen because everyone has the right to do what they love and they should not be judged for it being different than everyone else. It was always us versus them up until my junior year of high school when we finally earned the respect of our peers.
Last year, during one of my high school’s football games, a couple of students approached my friend and I. “Why do we need cheerleaders?”, “Don’t you think you guys are sort of distracting the football players?”, were the questions directed towards us. Because of my timid freshman self, I was unable to answer their question at the time. Why exactly did Cheerleaders matter? As the year went on, I couldn’t help but notice the drastic effects the
Many think of cheerleading as just an activity which is nearly mindless. They do not recognize the hard work and skill that is crucial in becoming a first-class cheerleader. They believe that there is no ability or athleticism that is needed. They almost demean cheerleaders as unintelligent. They believe that cheerleaders are only out to look pretty and to entertain a crowd.
By doing this, the school districts are portraying the message that cheerleading is a joke, and that it isn’t a real sport. It sets stereotypes for cheerleaders, and they have to work to overcome those stereotypes everyday. The school districts all over the US not classifying cheerleading as a sport are in the wrong. For several reasons, all school districts should recognize cheerleading as a sport.
Reilly’s Sports Illustrated column is not only inaccurate and full of unreliable information, but also he targeted cheerleaders based on one of his personal opinions. He didn’t write his article based on statistics and reliable information. Reilly simply wrote it based on what he thought with very few sources. In the first sentence he states “Every Friday night on America’s high school football fields, it’s the same old story. Broken bones. Senseless violence. Clashing egos.” To an extent this may be true for some cheerleaders, but the way that this opening statement is worded, it makes it sound like Reilly is saying this for every cheerleader out there. If this state...
Every sport has a strategy to win. On a competitive cheerleading team there is indeed is a way to keep score, therefore a way to win. There are many different score categories that make up a total score such as difficulty, style, tumbling, stunting, dancing, and sharpness of motions. When a squad messes up or makes mistakes, judges can deduct points from the overall score to make it known that a mistake occurred. This is similar to a foul or a flag on a play. There is a maximum amount of points that you can receive, but earning a perfect score is very hard to do. In the cheerleading world, the point system that can be so close and differ so little from other teams. Scores can differ as little as a tenth of a point to one hundred points or more. There is a winner and a loser just like sports that are classified as a sport or the ones that are competed on in the Olympics. Colleges are very biased when it comes to giving out scholarships and classifying cheerleading as a sport. It is very hard to attend college on a cheerleading scholarship. Most colleges make cheerleaders pay out of pocket for being on a cheerleading team. The college squads still compete for national titles and high school cheerleading teams still compete for state titles just like any other sports team would. It is all political when it comes to college sports due to the statistics of colleges and how the athletic department divides their money. Sports that are recognized as
Amanda Ripley constructed an article in which she opposes the use of athletics in American schools. She proclaims that America’s schools are placing athletics above academics. This highly controversial article was published on the cover of the Atlantic. Her argument raises opposition
The New York Times states that cheerleading is the fastest growing girls’ sport, yet more than half of Americans do not believe it is a sport. A sport is defined as “an athletic activity requiring skill or physical prowess and often of a competitive nature” (dictionary.com). Cheerleading at a competitive level is physically demanding and requires team work to be the best. The misconception of cheerleaders being weak, nonathletic crowd entertainers makes people believe cheerleaders are not athletes and that cheerleading is just a hobby but cheerleaders that compete at a competitive level are in fact athletes because it meets the standards of what a sport is, which includes rules and regulations, and overcoming air resistance.
For most writers, we must know the different types of argumentation styles along with logical fallacies. There are three main types of argumentation styles including: Aristotelian, Rogerian, and Toulmin. All three styles have their own argumentation spin on arguments. Aristotelian refutes the opposing claim while at the same time promoting its own argument by using supporting evidence. Some of that evidence includes using rhetorical appeals such as ethos, logos, and pathos. A Rogerian arguments are the arguments that find the common ground in order for an effective argument. Last but not least there is the Toulmin argument, the Toulmin argument is similar to the Aristotelian argument yet instead of appealing to the audience Toulmin focuses
In her article “Shitty First Drafts,” Anne Lamott creates an argument attempting to prove to her readers that every good writer begins with a “shitty” first draft. This is a very bold claim to make about writers, and obviously should have some solid evidence to back it up. However, contrary to what one might think, Lamott has little to no “real” evidence to support her statements. Instead, she uses humor and sarcasm to cover the fact that she has no real support for her views. By doing this, Lamott lacks much of the credibility (usually) needed in a rhetorical argument, and her humorous tone does not suffice for a convincing argument. Even though Lamott incorporates a great deal of sarcasm and absurdity in her work, she lacks the most important