He explains that if they were perfect writers, there would be no need for professors or teachers. Therefore, this article should be published because it shows how to argue that every generation has issues with the oncoming generation’s writing style just because it is a little different from what they are used to seeing. Every generation thinks they are the “golden age” of writing, thinks every generation after them is the end of good writing as we know it, and technological distractions are the cause for these terrible writers. Therefore, with a little bit of assistance from teachers and professors, people will be amazed that students may actually be able to write after
Lamott also stated that when she would write she would just write for example freewrite when you right without making and corrections, just writing the first thing that pops to your mind and it is possible that when you read it over you’ll get your perfect written work. When i read the title of Anne Lamott’s paper and read “shitty first draft” i was completely confused and now that i’ve read what she has to say and writing and who she is it makes me want to read one of her books, and while i read i 'm probably going to be
This article “Shitty First Drafts” by Anne Lamott help me understand that every good writer struggle to write their first draft and it might not be perfect at first but with a lot of dedication and effort everything could be done as expected. know that even the best published book started out with “Shitty First Drafts” help me to not be too critical to my first draft and having a little bit more confidences about my writing. I would apply this lesson whenever I have a writing assignment and I am get frustrated on how to start my essay, I would remember that all writers went through this stage of anxiety and not comfortable about their first draft. I would definitely recommend this article to a student that is starting their first composition
These mocking tactics are only discouraging to people that hold different beliefs than the author. This lack of calmness and rationality is a major downfall in terms of the essays persuasiveness. Lastly, Van Gelder uses weak reasoning to persuade the readers of her
When I first entered this class, I already knew that it wasn’t going to be easy just because I 'm not good with putting things into words and explaining myself with proper grammar. I can honestly say English 101 has really inspired me to be a better writer. This class affected me in a lot of ways it showed me that writing takes time and you can 't expect a paper to be great without any revising or editing. That has always been a mistake of mine, I would tend to free write a lot it seemed to be the only way I could get my thoughts processed on a paper. I would forget periods, commas and misspell words without even noticing.
No writer is born knowing how to write perfectly they all had to learn and that’s what I 'm doing except what they learned stuck to them. The obvious strength I have in writing is that it isn 't math. But being serious now two good strengths in writing that I have are creativity and the energy to want to write. The one weakness that hopefully is common is that I just don’t know how to put all of this together. My strengths and weaknesses make want to become a better writer hopefully this class will help.
By placing myself in the mindset of my audience I can start to overcome these fears and find the voice that wants to be written down. To work towards my next great source of u... ... middle of paper ... ...t someone else would pay money to read what I had written and to reprint it for others to read as well. With that article I knew that, for me, writing was more about conveying my emotions and experiences in simple yet defining prose then it was about stringing together a clever stream of synonyms. In a certain light, I can see myself as being the cruel mistress. I’ll never find a harsher critic than myself and it is this realization that ultimately gets me through the writing process.
Perhaps this is so obvious because what she was writing, was written in such a way, that it didn't even remotely resemble her own communication style. Dana seemed content writing to accommodate the expectations of the person she was writing for, rather than writing to satisfy her own expectations. It was very noticeable, even in the first sentences of her introductory paragraphs, that she purposely tip-toed around issues she could have addressed including the issues in her theme papers. Dana is not the person, style, or voice, that she portrays in her papers. Dana seems to have been taught to believing that writing quality is measured by a word choice that is high caliber, eloquent, and sophisticated.
In her article “Shitty First Drafts,” Anne Lamott creates an argument attempting to prove to her readers that every good writer begins with a “shitty” first draft. This is a very bold claim to make about writers, and obviously should have some solid evidence to back it up. However, contrary to what one might think, Lamott has little to no “real” evidence to support her statements. Instead, she uses humor and sarcasm to cover the fact that she has no real support for her views. By doing this, Lamott lacks much of the credibility (usually) needed in a rhetorical argument, and her humorous tone does not suffice for a convincing argument.
Writing is an art that can only be learned through repetition and practice, much like anything else a person must fail to succeed and learn from their mistakes. In writing, this means creating a first draft, reading it and understanding what was done wrong and rewriting until satisfied. You must teach them that any writing that they feel could be made better, they should never be content with. That writing, reading and rewriting what they do not find satisfactory. Can be the simplest and most effective method to improving their own writing, without the need for peer evaluation.