Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should NCAA athletes receive compensation
The importance of being a student athlete
Should college athletes be paid
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should NCAA athletes receive compensation
College athletics have received magnificent popularity among americans above the past few
years.This has resulted into improved revenues for the (NCAA) then the taking part colleges who have
argued the debate regarding whether college athletes should be payed past their athletic scholarships.This
informative essay on the topic “Should College athletes Be Paid?” will give pros,cons and reasons whether
college athletes should be paid. First by saying that only a few sports tend to bring in money. Often, it is the big sports like football
and basketball that bring in the most revenue.The money these programs bring in goes to pay for facilities,
the training, the programs and all kinds of other expenses of the university. If you
…show more content…
football players averaged 43 hours
a week.Baseball came in second with 421 hours and men's basketball came in third with 39.2. These are
season numbers. This mean that on top of class work and homework, athletes are working a full time
job”.If the athletes were paid for the talents that they possess while in school,they might be more willing to
finish their degree and just on the off chance that the sports path doesn't work out for them. Also got to
think about if they do get paid they are going to take advantage of that money and spend it on things they
don't need rather than that money be used of the gov loans, by back their scholarships etc.
Since these players have done well enough and to making it onto a college team, those most at
least get some payment for all their hard work.
Looking towards at college athlete's,you understand that most of the college athletes are getting
scholarships to play at that school so therefore they are getting an education as they are playing sports.
Some students would possibly hold that effortless and their parents help them out with money but others
don't have that option so they count on work to help cover expenses. According to the federal
Some feel that by not paying college athletes that college institutions are thereby exploiting their athletes free of charge, which is unfair. However, this article feels that college athletes are paid very favorably by the large amount of money they receive for schooling through scholarships. Also, since college athletes don’t pay to play or go to school they are receiving a free college degree whether or not they decide to stay in school for four years or not. With the training that they receive from professional trainers and nutritionists for a professional controlled diet they save possibly thousands within the 4 years they attend school and perform in collegiate athletics.
In summary college athletes should be paid because they are too busy to have a job, the NCAA has enough money and they can put in salary caps so everybody get paid
In 2004, over 40 schools brought in more than $10 million, with 10 of them bringing in over $30 million. Several athletes around the nation are worth more than $1 million to their school (Brown). Both of these statistics are proof that while these athletes are essential to their schools, they are still kept out of the revenue. Even though these universities won’t pay their players, the schools still have no problem giving their coaches some money. In 40 U.S. states, the head coach of the basketball or football program is the highest-paid public official (Edelman).
I have decided to write a response paper to Ekow N. Yankah’s: “Why N.C.A.A. Athletes Shouldn’t Be Paid”. Although I enjoyed reading his perspective, I do not agree with his statement which addresses that student-athletes shouldn 't get paid. Universities are using their student-athlete’s popularity to promote their athletics program while the student-athletes are unable to promote their own image. Student-athletes work hard day in and day out, basically like having a full time job. Which makes time is also very limited during the day for student athletes to get a real job to pay for the extra expenses that they need. Also, most of the time coaches will not allow the student athletes to work, because of their conflicting schedules with practice.
The debate on whether college athletes should be paid to play is a sensitive controversy, with strong support on both sides. College athletics have been around for a long time and always been worth a good amount of money. This billion dollar industry continues to grow in popularity and net worth, while they continue to see more and more money come in. The student-athletes who they are making the money off of see absolutely none of this income. It is time that the student-athletes start to see some of this income he or she may by helping bring the National Collegiate Athletic Association. There are many people who do not think this is in the best interest of the student-athletes or Universities, but that being said there are also many people who are in favor of the change.
One of the strongest arguments against student athletes getting paid is that many people feel they already are getting paid, through their financial aid package. Sports Illustrated author, Seth Davis, states in his article “Hoop Thoughts”, that “student athletes are already being payed by earning a free tuition. Which over the course of four years can exceed $200,000, depending on the school they attend. They are also provided with housing, textbooks, food and academic tutoring. When they travel to road games, they are given per diems for meals. They also get coaching, training, game experience and media exposure in their respective crafts” (Davis, 2011). This is a considerable amount of income. While the majority of regular students are walking out of school with a sizeable amount of debt, most student athletes are debt free. Plus they get to enjoy other benefits that are not made available to the average student. They get to travel with their teams, t...
In today’s society, one of the big controversies with sports is, should student athletes be be paid a salary? Some people believe that they should be paid and others would completely disagree. Even though they technically are being paid, they really are not. The only type of way the athletes would be paid is through financial aid or if they have a job. Only their education is being paid by the school. Although some people believe that they should be paid, it would not be a good idea at all. So college athletes should not be paid at all because they are basically being paid to study and play a sport.
When the football player walked into his dorm room he dropped his old cleats and wondered when he was going to have time to study for his exams. Because he was practicing so much and didn’t have time to find a job. Many think that since college athletes are getting a scholarship they should not be paid even though they work hard, and they make money for the school. College athletes practice so much and make money for the school but are not getting paid. Since things are getting more expensive, college athletes should be paid.
An article by O'Shaughnessy (2011) provides a run down of how much time each athlete puts into different sports. Division I baseball players spend 42.1 hours a week practicing on the field. (O'Shaughnessy, 2011) Division I football players spend even more time on the field, they practice 43.3 hours weekly.... ...
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
Last year the NCAA March Madness tournament alone generated $989 million, almost a billion dollars just from the tournament. Division I football programs generated $1 billion dollars last year while basketball programs generated $300 million (USA Today). The NCAA likes to throw out the statistic that only fourteen schools reported a profit last year from their athletic programs, but this number is misleading according to USA Today economists. Most schools will reshuffle their budgets to make it appears as though they are not generating a larger amount of profit. However, schools very often will find themselves with millions of dollars in generated revenue and will simply spend it either on coaches salaries or updating sports facilities to look like luxury spas.
When college football players return to the field this week, they'll have a little bit more cash in their wallets.
Without even getting into whether college athletes should be paid, I just don’t see a scenario where college athletes can be paid without allowing the gap to grow between the haves and the have-nots. (Dosh 578)
Some of these athletes are on the verge of becoming professionals and making millions of dollars but are stuck generating the money instead for the universities that they play for, depending on the sport. It is because of this that the athletes are scrutinized for every move that they make, and ultimately feel like they should be paid. Athletes coming out of high school must go to play college athletics such as football and basketball players before they can become professionals. Wilfred Sheed explains in his essay “Why Sports Matter” that college athletes should not be paid. “In the old days, the players were paid in nothing but glory” (Sheed 496). Sheed is trying to say that before players started to become selfish and become the next millionaire in the professionals, the athletes played the game only for victory and tried their best to succeed. When they were recognized for success, that was glorious enough for them. Mark Emmert brings in another side of perspective in his article “Ben Simmons’ Anger Misdirected”. Ben Simmons is the main focus of this article; a now professional basketball player who spent one year playing for the Louisiana State Tigers. Simmons is not a fan of the one-and-done rule, established by the National Basketball Association (NBA) in order to get gifted high school athletes to attend college. Emmert claims, “Those kids have to be students…” (Emmert). He is saying that even though these kids may be very talented at what they do, they still have to have an emphasis on school, which is stressful for some. However, Sheed feels like these athletes develop more than just a simple education from college athletics, that they learn how not to be selfish and develop a winning mentality (Sheed 505). John Thelin goes on to add to the Sheed in his article, “Here’s Why We Shouldn’t Pay College Athletes”. Here he goes over the numbers and statistics of a
Recruitment can be the biggest day of any high school athlete’s career is the day they’ve been working so hard for which is the day that they sign with the college team that can possibly take them all the way to the professional league. This day is also something that parents wait for because of the hard work and time they’ve invested to make sure that their child becomes one of the best athletes to ever play professionally. There are many hours and money spent to make sure that their athletic star is set up the way they need to be in order to be scouted by the top Ivy League school or even a professional team such as the NBA/WNBA, NFL or