Do fatal flaws in a character’s personality contribute to his/her demise?
How many times have we ever experienced death in our lives? None. That’s probably because we’re still alive. But, many of those who aren’t, probably had a reason why they aren’t with us today. In many cases, it can be said that our fatal flaws are the ones that are responsible for our demise. Whoever we are, we will always be people who have great flaws. That’s at least what most people know for themselves. However, are we really aware if whether these flaws will possibly dictate throughout their entire lives? In the late 1500’s, William Shakespeare wrote a magnificent play, Romeo and Juliet, which many audiences would consider it as a Love and Death story. Well, not
…show more content…
More specifically, when a person shows an aggressive attitude towards others, there is no doubt that one will result with an atrocious consequence. “Boy, this shall not excuse the injuries that thou hast done me. Therefore turn and draw... Wretched boy, you hung out with him here, and you’re going to go to heaven with him.” (Act 3, Scene 1). Tybalt shows a disgusting attitude in front of Romeo and Mercutio. Thus, the situation leads to a deadly fight which ended up with Tybalt losing his own life. Hence, Tybalt’s fatal flaw of having evil plans has led to his unfortunate demise. In addition, a person with great anger towards another individual may also lead themselves to their demise. When Romeo sees Tybalt kill his comrade, Mercutio, Romeo kills Tybalt in revenge (Act 3, Scene 1). Although Romeo was successful in his revenge towards Tybalt, it doesn’t mean that he ran into a better situation. Under the orders of the Prince, Romeo was to be banished from the city of Verona. Due to Romeo’s fatal flaws of his impulsive anger towards Tybalt, he sets himself up for his own downfall. Considerably, this also sets out a moral that any act lit by our impulsive anger should not be condoned as we are not able to have the correct state of mind to handle such situations. In the long run, when people intend a negative behavior towards others, such as being mean, cruel, or being …show more content…
To put it another way, when people do things with a positive intent, it may not always mean that what they are doing will definitely come within a positive result. In particular, a person who ignores all the negative potentials that might possibly happen to him might sound like this person is so majestic and full of positivity. But what a person is really doing isn’t always what he thinks he is doing. “Romeo: (to himself) Is she a Capulet? Oh, this is a heavy price to pay! My life is in the hands of my enemy.” Although Romeo and Juliet realize that they are each other’s family enemies they still continue to love each other by ignoring the deadly potentials to what their love would situate. (Act 1, Scene 5). Their ignorance made them run into their demise by losing their hopeless lives. They might have been thinking that ignoring the dangers of their love would seem as a right thing to do, but, as a result, it can easily be considered that their ignorance was almost surely the cause of their demise. Furthermore, people who think they are doing something caring and kind doesn’t always mean that they are doing exactly what they think they are doing. That means that some things you might be doing that you think are good for another individual, may be as dangerous as poison to them. For instance, Juliet’s father, Lord Capulet, forces her to marry with a man she does not love. Lord
Did you know that Romeo and Juliet was one of the biggest love story of all time. Romeo and Juliet is a story of two star-crossed lovers from two families the Capulets and the Montagues. The Capulets and the Montague had a big fight that made the families very angry at each other. Romeo and Juliet decide to get married. The two couple marry and run away. In the process both of them will die. When it comes to Romeo and Juliet who are the top three people that caused the two to die. The two people that are chosen are Friar Lawrence and Lady Capulet. Friar was chosen because he is the one that married Romeo and Juliet. Lady Capulet was chosen because she is forcing Juliet to marry Paris which is making Juliet want Romeo even more. The third thing
When asked by Benvolio to make peace in the streets, Tybalt bluntly responds,” talk of peace, I hate the word. As I hate hell all Montagues.” This is the attitude of Tybalt throughout the play. He believes he is doing all for the best and uses violence as his tool. He gets angry at the ball with Romeo being there, “villain as a guest,” and believes it best to defend his family’s honor by later taking revenge. When Tybalt finds Romeo, he thinks it best to fight him and when he ends up killing Mercutio he believes he has done his duty by causing Romeo the same hurt he has brought Tybalt, “the injuries that thou hast done me.”
Tybalt’s loyalty towards the family dispute intoxicates him with a quarrelsome nature. After recognizing Romeo at the Capulet Ball, Tybalt persistently rejects his uncle’s remonstrance to stay serene. Even after being restrained by his Uncle Capulet, he vows vengeance on Romeo in the future as he says, “Patience perforce with willful choler meeting Makes my flesh tremble in their different greeting. I will withdraw; but this intrusion shall Now seeming sweet, convert to bitt’rest gall” (1.5.88-90). Tybalt tends to take each and every “insult” towards his family and himself to heart, without even contemplating their true meaning. Furthermore, Tybalt’s aggravating behavior develops into a clear factor leading to his downfall. When Mercutio is found dead as a result of Tybalt, Romeo confronts him directly with a duel to the death. Rather than trying to discuss and come to a harmonious solution, Tybalt further inflamed the already belligerent environment. He does this by saying, “Thou, wretched boy, that didst consort him here, Shalt with him hence” (3.1.128-129). Tybalt’s relentless threatening behavior never fails to make an already hostile environment even worse. His cruel character is perpetual no matter what the
Explained in Depth: My Photo Essay In Act 1, Scene 1, another fight breaks out between the Capulets and the Montagues. It states in the Prologue: “From ancient grudge break to new mutiny,” –Prologue, Line 3.
In Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, two star-crossed lovers betrayed their own family in order to be with each other. Given that both Romeo and Juliet are both young, they made endless sacrifices and decisions just for them to be together without considering the consequences. All of their sacrifices resulted in vain as their tragic conclusion was their own death. Although fate played a significant role in the star-crossed lovers' downfall, Romeo and Juliet paid the consequences of their dreadful decisions due to their reckless rebellion which eventually led to their catastrophic ending. In the first few events that happened in the play, the readers have already seen some poor choices Romeo and Juliet made that eventually led to their death.
When Romeo killed Tybalt, he wasn’t in the right mindset to be able to control his emotions and actions. Romeo decided quickly and impulsively that, he had to get revenge for his friend Mercutio. He didn’t think about the outcomes that might come from killing Tybalt, like getting banned from Verona or even death. “…have thrice disturbed the quiet of our streets and made Verona’s ancient
Why might anyone kill true happiness? This was the case for Romeo and Juliet. There is no doubt that their death was tragic and horrible; however, the question is who is to blame for their death. Their death was simply on them they are the true people to blame. The story begins with the two family’s Montague and Capulet they rivaled each other and got in lots of fights. Soon after Romeo shows up in the scene when the pore heart broken Romeo from just breaking up with Roseline. From there the heartbroken Romeo goes to a party to get over it. Then Romeo soon meets Juliet and they become a thing. The new couple are wed secretly and only the friar and Juliet's nurse knew. Then after Romeo kill tybalt and is forced to
Many people think that society has changed so much over the years. That the way that children act, has taken a turn for the worst, but in reality children are learning from their ancestors. Children are lying to their parents, they are sneaking out at night to be with a boy that is “the one”, children are going back into the age of Shakespeare. In the play “Romeo and Juliet” which was written by William Shakespeare in 1597, there are two teenagers, Romeo and Juliet, who fall in love with each other. These two teenagers try to do everything that they can to live the rest of their lives together, except their families despise each other, so there is no way that they can live the rest of their lives together. So, many people believe that the way that our children are growing up today is taking away the fun parts of their childhood. However in this play Juliet did many of the things that teenagers are trying to do now. Children and sometimes adults now need to realize how your actions not only affect you but also the people around you, you also need to think about the consequences of the actions you make. At first Juliet falls in love at first sight with Romeo, then she takes a potion, which causes her family to think she is dead, and then how Friar Lawrence helps Juliet with the scheming, which shows how adults have to think about others as well.
The choices Romeo and Juliet make are poor, and eventually resulted in their death. Getting married, killing Tybalt, and thinking with hastyness were all poor choices that lead to both of their deaths. Once in a while making bad choices doesn’t affect someone as much, but making then many times regularly does affect one’s life. This teaches people that we must think our actions through before committing them.
Through the flaws in the characterization of his characters, Shakespeare allows their weakness to manipulate and cloud their judgment. This fundamentally leads to the outcome of Romeo and Juliet, with each weakness presenting a conflict that alters the characters fate. Being especially true with the star-crossed lovers, William Shakespeare leads their perfect love into tragedy with these conflicts. In Romeo and Juliet, Juliet, Friar Lawrence, and Tybalt all contribute to conflicts that enhance the plot. From destructive flaws in their characterizations, Juliet, Friar Lawrence, and Tybalt are all consequently controlled by their weakness, therefore affecting the outcome of the play.
This aggression is shown when Tybalt insults Romeo (3.1.55-69), calling him “thou art a villain” (3.1.56), and “boy” (3.1.61). In the context of this scene, boy is an insult. Once Romeo shows that he will not fight back (3.1.57-60), Tybalt’s ego takes control. This incident embodies cockiness as Tybalt continually berates Romeo and his friends with insults. He has no real reason to escalate this conflict as he knows that the Prince hates fighting. Despite this, Tybalt shows how cocky and abrasive he is, and perpetrates the tragedy by killing Mercutio and getting killed, himself. Since Tybalt literally beckons Romeo to draw (3.1.62), he further exemplifies cockiness. This results in a tragedy as Tybalt slays Mercutio and is slain by Romeo in turn. Furthermore, Tybalt shows aggression in his aside with Lord Capulet at the party. Tybalt says many threatening things about Romeo, calling him: “a slave” (1.5.52), his “foe” (1.5.59), and a “villain” (1.5.63). In this part of the story, Tybalt shows aggression, by wanting to kill Romeo. This is made evident by him asking his servant to grab his sword (1.5.52-4). Once again, Tybalt shows unnecessary aggression by insulting and threatening Romeo. This moves the plot towards tragedy by establishing a rivalry between Romeo and Tybalt. Later on, this rivalry results in the death of Tybalt and Mercutio. In summation, Tybalt’s aggression and cockiness results in the deaths of himself and Mercutio, making this story a
Shakespeare shows throughout the play how the characters continue to forgive the ones they love, even in the harsh circumstances. Angered by the death of his good friend Mercutio, Romeo slays Tybalt. “This gentleman, the Prince’s near ally, /My friend, hath got this mortal hurt In my behalf-my reputation stained /With Tybalt’s slander-Tybalt, that an hour /Hath been my cousin.”(3, 1, 104-108). Juliet could have been very angry with Romeo since Tybalt was her cousin but she was more heartbroken over Romeo’s exile. Shakespeare displays that Juliet’s love for Romeo overpowered the hate she had for him killing Tybalt. In addition, Shakespeare displayed that love conquers hate through the relationship between Juliet and her father, Lord Capulet. Near the end of the play Capulet told Juliet that she had ...
Characters are deprived of their ability to handle situations tactfully as their emotions overtake their actions. At first, Romeo’s love for Juliet prevents him from fighting Tybalt as Romeo states in act 3, scene 1, that “...the reason that [he] [has] to love [Tybalt]\[d]oth much excuse the appertaining rage…”(62-63). Becoming over emotional, Romeo places his love for Juliet over his concern for Mercutio leading to the death of Mercutio. Afterwards, Romeo states in act 3, scene 1 that, “...fire-eyed fury be [his] conduct now!”(125). Following the death of Mercutio, Romeo compounds the problem by placing his own feelings of anger and revenge, over his concerns for Juliet by killing Tybalt. The powerful emotions that control Romeo define him as an over emotional character; consequently, commanding emotions such as love and revenge cannot be properly handled by Romeo. The obstacles created by a character’s compelling emotions are made harsher as a character becomes over emotional. Romeo’s emotions not only create the obstacle, but also provide the fuel for it; this growing obstacle will be extremely life changing; Romeo’s obstacle of residing with Juliet, a Capulet, is made harsher as Romeo gets banished. What was the cause of his banishment? Emotions. Powerful emotions. Over emotionally, Romeo kills Tybalt even though Tybalt was going to be punished for his sin anyways. The mental position of a character in literature is amended to over emotional by the character’s powerful emotions, which fuel existing consequences, harming the host
Everyone is to blame for the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. Romeo, Juliet, Friar Laurence, and Romeo and Juliet’s parents all played their own role in causing the four deaths of Romeo, Juliet, Tybalt, and Paris. It is not just one of them to blame, every one of them did something to cause the tragedy. Some of them played a bigger role than others, but everyone contributed. Fate had nothing to do with it and it was all the different characters faults. Romeo, Juliet, and Friar Lawrence’s rash decisions where the main cause of the tragedy.
Tybalt was a adversary of Romeo and had the drift to kill him. His spleen of the situation is Romeo trying to love his coz Juliet. He approached Romeo and Mercutio looking for a fight. Tybalt and Mercutio ended up fighting and Tybalt killed Mercutio, because Tybalt did this, he deserved the death penalty for his transgression. Romeo then took revenge and killed him (3.1.70). This is a legal issue because Tybalt was going to be treated to the death penalty anyway so Romeo killing him was just like giving him the death penalty. This death is a lot different than the others because his was a legal issue and he deserved to die, the other deaths in the play like Romeo, Juliet and Mercutio decided to die for a family member that they love.