More handpicked essays just for you.
Romeo and juliet romeo character critical analysis
Literary analysis of romeo and juliet
Romeo and juliet character analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As a famous author once said, “You don’t have to attend every argument you’re invited to.” To clarify, it isn’t necessary to engage in every conflict that is encountered. In William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Tybalt is a truculent and unsympathetic man who tends to take the quarrel between the Capulets and Montagues a step too far. He soon is challenged with a fight he cannot beat. In this tragic play, Tybalt’s tragic flaw of aggressiveness guides him towards a bitter end. Often, the worst qualities lead to the worst outcome. Tybalt tends to use force as his way of talking, which often backfires and has negative results. When Tybalt is first introduced into the play, he is immediately caught in-between the family dispute. His sentiment …show more content…
Tybalt’s loyalty towards the family dispute intoxicates him with a quarrelsome nature. After recognizing Romeo at the Capulet Ball, Tybalt persistently rejects his uncle’s remonstrance to stay serene. Even after being restrained by his Uncle Capulet, he vows vengeance on Romeo in the future as he says, “Patience perforce with willful choler meeting Makes my flesh tremble in their different greeting. I will withdraw; but this intrusion shall Now seeming sweet, convert to bitt’rest gall” (1.5.88-90). Tybalt tends to take each and every “insult” towards his family and himself to heart, without even contemplating their true meaning. Furthermore, Tybalt’s aggravating behavior develops into a clear factor leading to his downfall. When Mercutio is found dead as a result of Tybalt, Romeo confronts him directly with a duel to the death. Rather than trying to discuss and come to a harmonious solution, Tybalt further inflamed the already belligerent environment. He does this by saying, “Thou, wretched boy, that didst consort him here, Shalt with him hence” (3.1.128-129). Tybalt’s relentless threatening behavior never fails to make an already hostile environment even worse. His cruel character is perpetual no matter what the
Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet portrays Tybalt as a pugnacious fighter who is often quarreling with his opponents, the Montagues. At the dawn of the book a fight breaks out between a couple of low standing Montagues and Capulets. When Benvolio tries to step in and keep the peace Tybalt attacks him. “What, draw, and talk of peace! I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee” (I,i,80). Tybalt, even through Benvolio’s insistence on peace, attacks him for his hatred of his foe is strong. Later in the act Romeo, Mercutio, and Benvolio are attending the party put on by Lord Capulet. Tybalt eventually spots Romeo dancing with Juliet, and makes to end Romeo for it. It fits, when such a villain is a guest: I’ll not endure him” (I,v,698).
Romeo senses tensions are high with Tybalt, so he states, “I do protest I never injured thee but love thee better than thou canst devise.” (Lines 65-66 Act Three, Scene One). Romeo is trying to diffuse the situation because he realizes that Tybalt is his love's cousin. Mercutio is surprised by Romeo’s behavior, so he decides to fight Tybalt himself. Mercutio’s decision to fight Tybalt leads to his own death. Romeo is angered by the death of Mercutio and states, “Now, Tybalt, take the “villain" back again/ That late thou gavest me; for Mercutio’s soul.” (Lines 123-124 of Act Three, Scene One). Romeo is indicating that Tybalt is the villain now, because he slayed Mercutio. Romeo forgets about his attempt to befriend the Capulets and slays Tybalt. Romeo, murderer of Tybalt, solely focuses on Juliet and states “Ha, banishment? Be merciful, say “death"/For exile hath more terror in his look.” (Lines 12-13 of Act Three, Scene Three). Romeo does not care about Tybalt’s life, but only cares for the way it affects his relationship with Juliet. Romeo’s mother dies out of grief because of his banishment. Romeo’s recklessness in loving Juliet has led to the death of three
In the Shakespearean play, Romeo & Juliet, aggression is represented in different ways by the different characters in the play. Tybalt, Romeo, Benvolio, and the others all have their own way of dealing with hate and anger. Some do nothing but hate while others can’t stand to see even the smallest of quarrels take place.
Tybalt says that Romeo is a villain, a trouble maker. He states that he will not stand for
When asked by Benvolio to make peace in the streets, Tybalt bluntly responds,” talk of peace, I hate the word. As I hate hell all Montagues.” This is the attitude of Tybalt throughout the play. He believes he is doing all for the best and uses violence as his tool. He gets angry at the ball with Romeo being there, “villain as a guest,” and believes it best to defend his family’s honor by later taking revenge. When Tybalt finds Romeo, he thinks it best to fight him and when he ends up killing Mercutio he believes he has done his duty by causing Romeo the same hurt he has brought Tybalt, “the injuries that thou hast done me.”
Romeo, enraged at the killing of one of his dearest friends, challenges Tybalt to a fight for revenge, saying:
Tybalt uses gentle expressions such as ‘love’ only to sharply accuse Romeo if a villain. Although somewhat insignificant, this sentence structure adds to the cruelty that Tybalt portrays. Romeo does not want to fight and explains reasons as to why, however Tybalt will not accept that he is not fighting someone and Mercutio gives Tybalt the perfect reason and opportunity to start a fight. Shakespeare seems to want the audience to sees Tybalt’s urge to pick fights as a big reason for the tragedy.
In Act 1 Scene 5 Tybalt makes a comment of, “It fits when such a villain is a guest. I'll not endure him” (Shakespeare 527). This shows his inability to accept anyone as they are rather than how he sees them personally. Then again on the same page he also exclaims, “Tis he, that villain Romeo.” Again Tybalt goes onto claim everyone as villain as he sees fit. He has a shortness of temper that can be seen quite easily with just these two quotes from the play.
Likewise I mentioned before Tybalt is always trying to stir up trouble with the Montagues. For example he tried to fight Benvolio and while he was trying to Tybalt said this, “What, drawn, and talk of peace? I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee. Have at thee, coward!” (Act
Tybalt was known to be a hothead. If he hadn’t grown to the point of anger where he disobeyed Lord Capulet’s orders, he may have prevented five deaths. When Tybalt let his anger get the best of him and he slayed Mercutio, Romeo retaliated over the death of his best friend. As punishment for this act, Romeo was banished, and Juliet was distraught. Leading to the potion Juliet took to prevent her marriage with Paris, the poison Romeo took to die with her, and the dagger Juliet plunged into her heart. If Tybalt wouldn’t have started these arguments or been so prideful, he wouldn’t have killed Mercutio, he would still be alive himself, Paris would not have died, Romeo would not have drank the poison, and therefore Juliet would not be
Tybalt is Romeo's rival, and his grudge against Romeo and the Montagues is the reason why the two lovers' story ends in tragedy. He plays a very crucial and important role in the story as it's the main antagonist. His actions and arrogant and aggressive personality are some the reasons why this story ends in suffering, grief, and tragedy.
"...For never was a story of more woe, than this of Juliet and her Romeo" (243, L 320). Romeo and Juliet stands as one of the world's most vibrant and entertaining literary pieces. The play entails the story of the sole off-springs of two feuding families descending deeply into love, and the consequences of their lives to pay. Throughout the play, William Shakespeare carves persona of different types. Juliet's nurse, Tybalt and Lord Capulet possess strong influences on the tale.
One way that Tybalt might have changed the outcome of the play is by not killing Mercutio. Tybalt wanted to duel with Romeo but Romeo refused so Mercutio accepted, “Alive, in triumph! And Mercutio slain! Away to heaven, respective lenity, and fire eyed fury be my conduct now. 3.1. 118-120. As a result of Tybalt killing Mercutio, Romeo killed Tybalt, and was banished, so he was unable to run away with Juliet. If Tybalt was friends with Romeo then there never would have been a duel, Tybalt would still be alive, and Romeo would never have been banished. Another way that Tybalt might have changed the outcome of the play is by minding his own business. Tybalt wanted to start fights with almost any montague he could, especially Romeo. “Uncle, this is a Montague, our foe, a villain that is hither come in spite.” 1.5.3. As a result of Tybalt always putting himself in other people’s business, he ended up dueling Mercutio, which got Mercutio killed, which also angered Romeo who then killed Tybalt. If Tybalt would have just minded his own business then Mercutio and Tybalt would still be alive and Romeo would not have been banished. A third way that Tybalt would have changed the outcome of the play is by not hating Romeo. Tybalt wanted to attack Romeo every chance he got. “Tis he, that villain Romeo.” 1.5. 63. As a result of Tybalt wanting to attack Romeo, he went to duel him but ended up dueling and slaying
Tybalt’s ineptitude to understanding the boundaries of what degree he can express his anger result in his immediate downfall. Tybalt first demonstrates an excessive amount of violence when he encounters Mercutio. Out on a public street, Tybalt and Mercutio confront each other and spark an argument, in which Tybalt remarks, “Boy, this shall not excuse the injuries/ That thou hast done me; therefore turn and draw” (3.1.63-64). This quote clearly supports the fact that Tybalt’s tolerance towards others only last for a short period of time, before he feels the urge to challenge that person to a duel. Tybalt exclaims that injuries are no excuse, showing that he can’t differentiate between insulting, as Mercutio was doing, and posing violent
Seething with anger, before Tybalt decides to slay Romeo, Lord Capulet confronts Tybalt and tells him that there’s no need to ruin the festivities for a fight. Disgusted by his weakness, Tybalt angrily hissed back to the Lord, “It fits when such a villain is a guest. I’ll not endure him!” (1.2.75-76), and leaves the party in frustration. Tybalt only understands that if he slew any Montague that steps his path, he’ll be content with killing all them off instead of letting the Lord Capulet’s weakness get in the way about being hostile towards his enemies. With this intention in his mind, being a violent and headstrong man, Tybalt has to restrain himself and then loses the opportunity to slay Romeo. Therefore, he’s angry and will not rest until Romeo is slain. Thus, Tybalt’s motivation shown that, in order to quell the pain and suffering the Capulet’s has suffered, he’ll end the feud between the two families and would not stop until the deed has been