Robin Tolmach Lakoff's You Are What You Say

1183 Words3 Pages

A vividly concrete illustration of the change of words connotation depending on their usage is provided by Robin Tolmach Lakoff in his work You Are What You Say. He explained that the construction of sentences conveys different meaning. According to Tolmach Lakoff’s investigation, flat statements sound more confident, direct, and dogmatic. They show that a speaker knows what he says and believes fairly in his words (Lakoff 322). In comparison, a yes-no question will point at lack of the respondent’s knowledge, while a tag question shows that a person knows the subject of conversation but she is not so confident in the truth of the claim. It is obvious that tag questions are the best for communication with people if you do not want to sound …show more content…

By language, words, slang, gestures, mimes, and tone of voice which a person uses in communication, we can understand his or her social status, education, occupation, nationality, place of birth, and cultural identity. For example, a certain type of English is used by black people in the USA. It is not a language of any tribe in Africa and it is not an American or British option of English (Baldwin 46). It cannot be understood by white Americans entirely since it was created for needs of black people’s communication in the USA during the era of slavery (Baldwin 46). Gloria Anzaldua notices that Chicano Spanish is neither the literary option of English or Spanish. It was developed naturally by people who lived in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California as a result of blend of English and Spanish (Anzaldua pp.32-33). People identify themselves with their own languages. Consequently, prohibition of a certain language can be compared with neglecting of certain nationalities or social groups. Anzaldua compares it with linguistic terrorism because people lack an opportunity to be proud of their identity and feel waning by speaking the “wrong” option of language. On the other hand, what right do we have to define which language is right or wrong? Any language develops …show more content…

Taflinger in the work “The Power of Words: Advertising Tricks of the Trade.” It shows that sometimes it could be dangerous or fatal to use a “wrong” word or do not know the real meaning of the word. Taflinger noticed that misunderstanding of the word meaning of the words can affect the results of the political negotiations and lead to wars or peace. It sounds ridiculous and awful, but at the end of World War II “the Allies Powers sent a message to the Japanese demanding surrender” and got the response which included the word “mokusatsu” (Taflinger 1996). This word had two meanings: "to ignore" or "to withhold comment" (Taflinger 1996). The problem was that the Allies thought that the Japanese ignored the demand, though the Japanese asked to withhold comment. Therefore, the Allies dropped the atom bomb on the Nagasaki to end the war (Taflinger 1996). The consequences of such misunderstanding were horrible. The other example of people’s misunderstanding because of different meaning of words connects with fights in South Korea. It is certainly not so awkward but still affects our lives. It sounds strange, but lots of fights occurred in South Korea because “It’s yours” in Korean literally sounds like “Nigger.” I recently heard a news that an African American man beat up a bus driver because when he tried to give the bus driver the wallet he picked

Open Document