Rhetorical Analysis Of Elizabeth I Queen Of England

1161 Words3 Pages

Historically, the role of the female has always been to support her husband. In the renaissance, many women have taken up the mantle of being the male often due to circumstances beyond their control. In the renaissance, many women were forced to take on the role of their male counterparts due to circumstances outside of their control. Women were expected to play second fiddle to men, however, Elizabeth I queen of England played multiple roles as both king of the country and mother to her people. In this paper, I will examine how she utilizes the rhetoric of her speeches to blend traditional female gender attributes with traits associated with male rulers in order to achieve her political goals. Elizabeth I utilizes rhetoric in her speeches by blending traditional …show more content…

The sentence “taking foul scorn that Parma or any prince of Europe should dare to invade the borders of her realm” displays a sense of kingly arrogance and complete lack of fear from a male figure on the other side. Even though the act of aggression is coming from him, her words make it seem as if there is no trepidation on her end, as demonstrated by the line: “I myself will be your general, judge, and rewarder of your virtue in the field” (236). A general and judge are both roles primarily held by males in very prestigious levels of power. Her adopting these roles further adds to the power she previously commands in her speech when she mentions her kingly attributes. Religion is a tool Elizabeth uses to give credibility to her claims as a ruler and it displays the idea that it is her divine right to rule over the kingdom. It is as if God has provided her with the duty to rule the country and her consistent invocation of the word “God” allows her to achieve her objective of motivating the troops through an external

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Elizabeth I Queen Of England

Open Document