Reframing The Argument On Gay Marriage Essay

620 Words2 Pages

In the U.S many believe that their living in a land that the founding fathers considered to be a land where the basic rights will be implemented and every can live in a nation that is filled with piece, however it’s not exactly like that despite what some people might comprehend. For instance, in the article, “ Reframing the Argument on Gay Marriage,” it states, We are not a religious nation, no matter how many of our citizens consider themselves to be. Our founding fathers- - in both the Constitution and the Treaty with Tripoli -- ensured this as a means of guaranteeing autonomous government and the right offer all people who might come to our shores.” This quote is to show that this nation was suppose to free without any restrictions on how a person should think or act. Without this, all of the ideas and aspirations that were written in the Constitution would only be signed off as false hope and that their isn’t true basic rights or even pursuit of happiness, because shouldn’t the same sex also pursue those same rights as any other american. …show more content…

There’s multiple ways the idea of having same sex marriage legalized should be considering the fact on the thousands of people can obtain benefits for themselves that they never had before. For example, in the article “ Social Security agency shows why Supreme Court must act on gay marriage,” it claims that “Social Security has published new instructions that allow the agency to process more claims in which entitlement or eligibility is affected by a same-sex relationship,” the federal retiree agency said. Unfortunately, “the Social Security Act requires the agency to follow state law in Social Security cases.” Although there’s a flow the Social security is doing all they can to give these people the same right as everyone else despite the implications that are in

Open Document