Reflection Of Scientific Naturalism

The definition of scientific naturalism can be defined as David Ray Griffin says on page 62 of his book titled “Two Great Truths” is “the kind of naturalism required by science.” According to David Ray Griffin as I see his perspective that the Christian faith can be a gestalt switch, that literally sees different things in the world. To begin, as relating Christian faith to scientific naturalism and of naturalism by itself as Griffin says, “… which I call naturalismsam has not left room for Christian faith [to] … discussing modern liberal theology, which is the movement that tried to accommodate Christian faith to the worldwide of the scientific community during the deistic and late modern periods.” As I see here that, the Christian faith can

To begin, observation in my model as contrasted with intuition is that throughout this quarter of being in this class of learning about on nature and human values is it has become stronger with my religious experience as now I look at the whole picture is that I try to include science into my thinking now with religion by not putting it by the side. Second, my observation in my model of life now as contrasted with intuition at the beginning of this class is that the structure of my perception with my religious experience is it has become stronger as thinking in the ways of sensory perception and nonsenory perception, as now I am able to go back and forth between the two to critical think, self-evaluate, and to have interpersonal communication between science and religion. Lastly, my observation contrasted with intuition as of scientific naturalism and religious experience on human understanding in my structure of perception is that needs to be a time for these two to have a balance so more people are able to understand the two together at the same time and not separated from each other because as I learned to better understand such as to hear and see the world in a different perspective as other people talk about the same