Kassidy Kirven
Professor Vuolo
Criminology
11/12/17
Recidivism
Recidivism is an essential concept within the criminal justice system. It is the tendency of a previously convicted offender to reoffend. Thus, it is important to study the rates and causes of recidivism in order to recognize certain patterns. The patterns of reoffending can help law enforcement officials and policy makers implement strategies to lower the rates. On a humanitarian basis, studying the patterns can help with the difficult transition from prison to society for those recently released.
Prison is a form of deterrence. As stated in our lecture, if punishment is unpleasant, less crime will be committed. Thus, the possibility of going back to prison alone should be a deterrent for a previously convicted criminal. However, that is not the case, or else the recidivism rate would essentially be zero. According to the rational choice theory, certainty, severity, and swiftness greatly influence deterrence. If it is unlikely a person will get caught or the punishments aren’t very severe, it might encourage to them to reoffend. Studies have shown that programs like Scared Straight don’t actually scare potential offenders away at all. Therefore, while this theory may explain recidivism simply, it does not account for the many other
…show more content…
Rather than nature of the individual, it focuses on the nature of the neighborhood. Poverty concentration in a specific neighborhood may drive an individual to steal food or necessities. If said individual is released from jail or prison and the neighborhood is in the same conditions, he might be driven to reoffend. Collective efficacy is key in resetting this cycle by increasing informal social controls. Cohesion among the community to intervene on behalf on the common good may help decrease recidivism rates, especially with crimes such theft or
Policymakers on the national, state, and local levels are always finding ways to improve the nature of the reentry process. The reentry process starts in correctional facilities and helps inmates prepare themselves for release and proceeds with their transition back into society as law-abiding citizens. In comparison to the average American, ex-offenders tend to be less educated, less likely to gain employment, suffer from substance abuse, or have been diagnosed with a mental illness. All of these aspects discussed are shown to be risk factors for recidivism, which is the tendency that causes criminals to re-offend. Generally, the offender reintegration process needs to be improved by properly monitoring the outcomes for reentry programs in order to return prisoners back to society safely.
According to the National Institute of Justice, recidivism is one of the most fundamental concepts in criminal justice. The NIJ defines recidivism as a person’s relapse into criminal behavior, often after receiving sanctions or undergoing intervention for a previous crime. Recidivism is often utilized in evaluating prisons effectiveness in crime control. Reducing recidivism is crucial for probation, parole and to the correctional system overall.
This form of treatment is very practical and is used to prevent high-risk characteristics that lead to recidivism. Ward, Mesler, & Yates (2007) break down the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model into it’s three components in order to better understand how the treatment works. The model identifies who should be targeted for treatment, what factors that reduce recidivism should be focused on, and how each individual offender responds to the program (Ward et al., 2007). Though it has been empirically proven to work, the program must utilize all three factors in order to lessen the likelihood of recidivism. However, there are always areas for improvement in each form of rehabilitation. As Ward et al. (2007) point out, the RNR model focuses solely on changing the risk characteristics and less on the actually individual in treatment. Like Cognitive Behavioral therapy, RNR has been frequently used to assess offenders and prevent recidivism. Both programs work while the offender is imprisoned, so that they can be more prepared for reentry. Even though RNR has been working, there are some studies that call for a better form of treatment. Including the complaints for the RNR model, Ward, Mann, & Gannon (2007) analyzed the Good Lives model, which is a better version of the RNR model. The Good Lives model includes the RNR model, but adds some characteristics that enable it to work
Combating the recidivism rate has been shown to be a daunting task for America. America has the highest population in prisons with 20% of the world’s prison population and only 5% of the world’s population (Prison Crisis, 2014). The definition of Recidivism rate is defined in Merriam Webster as “a tendency to relapse into a previous condition or mode of behavior; especially: relapse into criminal behavior”. New Bedford has the highest crime rate of all of Massachusetts with an estimated 1,200 violent crimes in just the last year making studying this city prevalent. Throughout this paper I will examine recidivism rates throughout the country, and how these effects can help and affect New Bedford in particular. We will also examine the effects
Today, our country’s correctional facilities are filled with many people, ranging from juveniles, teenagers, adults and the elderly. To get to where they are, these people committed a crime, if not several crimes and are now incarcerated. Incarceration is a process which is meant to “treat” and to “punish” those who have exhibited criminal behavior. However, in order for a criminal to fully recovery, a behavior modification program may be implemented. Ranging from operant techniques to systematic desensitization, individuals who are incarcerated can shape their criminal behavior into law-abiding and socially accepted behaviors.
We can all agree that an important goal of the American criminal justice system is rehabilitation. It expects that most, if not all, offenders to learn from his or her wrongdoing and become productive members of society (Ballenstedt, 2008). It is this thinking at the heart of a community-based initiative that is designed to bring law enforcement officials together to form a single concerted effort to identify and address patterns of crime, mitigate the underlying conditions that fuel crime, and engage the community as an active partner (Wolf, Prinicples of Problem-Solving Justice, 2007).
An estimated 650,000 offenders are released from prisons each year. Most generally leave with only a few dollars, some clothes, and possibly a bus ticket. Release practices like this are common and can be especially disastrous for mentally ill inmates. If immediately released without access to health care, the mentally ill will suffer from interruption of continuity of care. In prison, they may have been receiving medication, therapy, or other forms of treatment. Interruption of care could lead to excelled deterioration in their mental health. This tends to lead to a higher rate of recidivism among mentally-ill former prisoners. (Hummert, 2011.).
Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpuio stated that he, “believes in the retributive goal of corrections and notes strong public support for getting tough on crime and criminals” (Sieter, 2014, p. 26). The above evidence shows that if crime is punished by incarceration and the fear of incarceration is in the criminal offenders mind, then they may not pursue in criminal activity. As Joe Arpuio states “getting tough on crime,” the tougher retributive punishments are, may again deter crime.
This research paper is focused on released convicts and the struggles they face to become active, progressive members of society. Sadly, these released offenders regularly face discrimination in their job searches, in attempts to secure housing for themselves and their families, and to be accepted by their communities. Without the right support structures in place upon their release, these former prisoners may very well fall back into lives of crime. Without a suitable place to stay, these released offenders may become recidivists, falling back into their familiar roles as law breakers, if only to provide the basic necessities for themselves and their families. Statistically, more than one third of released offenders end up back in jail within a year of their initial release. Through this study, I hoped to shed light on some of the main causes of criminal recidivism using Labeling Theory and Social Learning Theory.
The purpose of this qualitative case study is to explore recidivism from the perspective of finding community base inmate released programs, and to prevent criminals to reverting back to their criminal behavior after being released into society. Recidivism is defined as the act of a person repeating or relapsing into an undesirable
Due to the multiple definitions of recidivism, there have been very few studies comparing recidivism rates is public and private prisons. The concept of recidivism can be defined as “the reversion or relapse to criminal acts of a acts of an offender who has been subject to punitive sanctions or rehabilitative treatment for previous conduct, such reversions or relapses can be measured as rearrest, reconviction, reincarceration, or even absconding” (Spivak). Also, it is hard to decide how long after release is considered recidivism so it’s difficult to use recidivism is a way to measure if a prison is successful.
Such an assumption does not refute that some criminals make their own personal choices to break the law but rather it argues that these personal choices are usually caused by certain factors which contribute to criminal behavior. Rehabilitation programs are therefore based on such perspectives where the various correctional programs are designed to deal with criminal enforcing behavior. For example counseling programs could focus on the behavior that led to the criminal offender committing the offense while educational programs could focus on how to change negative behavior to positive behavior. Correctional programs in prison facilities are therefore important in reducing the recurrence of criminal behavior as well as reducing recidivism among probationers and parolees (Barkan & Bryjak, 2009).
Therefore, the community has informal social control, or the connection between social organization and crime. Some of the helpful factors to a community can be informal surveillance, movement-governing rules, and direct intervention. They also contain unity, structure, and integration. All of these qualities are proven to improve crime rate. Socially disorganized communities lack those qualities. According to our lecture, “characteristics such as poverty, residential mobility, and racial/ethnic heterogeneity contribute to social disorganization.” A major example would be when a community has weak social ties. This can be caused from a lack of resources needed to help others, such as single-parent families or poor families. These weak social ties cause social disorganization, which then leads higher levels of crime. According to Seigel, Social disorganization theory concentrates on the circumstances in the inner city that affect crimes. These circumstances include the deterioration of the neighborhoods, the lack of social control, gangs and other groups who violate the law, and the opposing social values within these neighborhoods (Siegel,
The United States is leading the world in the number of people incarcerated in prisons. Mass incarceration has become a topic of debate with an estimated 2.3 million people behind bars. All states combined spend over 52 billion on corrections and correction related activities annually (Gorgol & Sponsler, 2011). The US justice system has placed a great deal of focus on locking people up without equally focusing on how to prevent people from revolving in and out of the prison's doors creating an unbalanced system. What can reduce the recidivism rates and help incarcerated individuals successfully reenter society? Higher education is at the forefront of ways to reduce recidivism, and it
Individuals are influenced by their family and peers causing them to possibly be prone to a life of crime. If they are not getting support at home, they may seek out gang life in order to feel wanted, and this provides a sense of stability in individuals’ lives’. There are minimal deterrents to stop those who go into a life of crime and poverty encourages criminal behavior. Crime could be minimalized if programs could be enforced to provide a stable environment and safe environment to those who are disadvantaged. This could implement values into individuals who are not taught otherwise.